DiscoverPretty Lies And AlibisState's Response To Lori Daybell's Appeal - Part 2: Mark Means Disqualification
State's Response To Lori Daybell's Appeal - Part 2: Mark Means Disqualification

State's Response To Lori Daybell's Appeal - Part 2: Mark Means Disqualification

Update: 2025-12-20
Share

Description

Part 2 breaking down the state's response to Lori Daybell's appeal motion:
  • The State of Idaho is asking the Idaho Supreme Court to uphold Lori Vallow Daybell’s murder convictions and life sentence without parole. Prosecutors argue the trial court acted correctly in all respects and that Vallow’s constitutional claims fail.

  • The State says Vallow’s original attorney was properly disqualified due to a serious conflict of interest after representing both Vallow and Chad Daybell during the alleged conspiracy. Because Vallow was incompetent at the time, prosecutors argue she could not legally waive that conflict, and the court was right to reject any waiver given the severity of the case.




Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.
Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

State's Response To Lori Daybell's Appeal - Part 2: Mark Means Disqualification

State's Response To Lori Daybell's Appeal - Part 2: Mark Means Disqualification

GiGi McKelvey