DiscoverElixir WizardsStatic Code Analysis in Elixir vs. Ruby with René Föhring & Marc-André Lafortune
Static Code Analysis in Elixir vs. Ruby with René Föhring & Marc-André Lafortune

Static Code Analysis in Elixir vs. Ruby with René Föhring & Marc-André Lafortune

Update: 2023-12-14
Share

Description

In this episode of Elixir Wizards, hosts Owen and Dan are joined by René Föhring, creator of Credo for Elixir, and Marc-André LaFortune, head maintainer of the RuboCop AST library for Ruby. They compare static code analysis in Ruby versus Elixir.



The conversation explores the intricacies and challenges inherent in static code analysis across object-oriented and functional programming paradigms, highlighting the unique characteristics of both Ruby and Elixir. Key topics of discussion include the ways these tools can enhance coding styles and empower developers, the delicate balance between providing guidance and enforcing rules, and the evolving future of code analysis in these languages.



Topics discussed in this episode:




  • The differences and applications between static and dynamic analysis

  • How Credo aims to offer flexible and educational guidance for Elixir developers

  • The complexities of method identification in Ruby and its impact on static analysis

  • Challenges posed by macros and dynamic code modification during compilation in Elixir

  • Reducing false positives in code analysis tools to minimize developer frustration

  • Promoting uniform coding practices through analysis tools

  • The significance of using analysis tools with clear, specific objectives

  • How coding standards can refine and improve coding styles over time

  • Building analysis tools and checks through an understanding of Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs)

  • Potential advancements in the analysis of Phoenix templates and HTML in Elixir

  • Contrasting approaches to managing code and comments in Elixir and Ruby ASTs

  • The fine line between providing helpful guidance and imposing stylistic preferences

  • Heuristics in static analysis highlight inconsistencies without mandating style

  • The potential for more straightforward pattern matching in ASTs with future updates

  • The importance of a gradual implementation of tool updates to maintain backward compatibility

  • Creating tools that support and empower developers, rather than hinder them

  • How static analysis contributes to cleaner, more maintainable codebases

  • Potential future developments in the field of static code analysis

  • Practical applications of using linters like Credo and RuboCop in software development



Links mentioned in this episode:



Credo https://github.com/rrrene/credo

https://hexdocs.pm/credo/overview.html

Dogma: A code style linter for Elixir https://github.com/lpil/dogma

https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop

RuboCop's AST extensions and NodePattern functionality https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop-ast

https://github.com/whitequark/parser

https://hex.pm/packages?search=credo&sort=recent_downloads

https://github.com/doorgan/sourceror

https://github.com/rrrene/credo/blob/master/lib/credo/check/readability/large_numbers.ex

Special Guests: Marc-André Lafortune and René Föhring.

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Static Code Analysis in Elixir vs. Ruby with René Föhring & Marc-André Lafortune

Static Code Analysis in Elixir vs. Ruby with René Föhring & Marc-André Lafortune

SmartLogic LLC