DiscoverThe NPR Politics PodcastSupreme Court Shifts Regulatory Power From Experts To Judges
Supreme Court Shifts Regulatory Power From Experts To Judges

Supreme Court Shifts Regulatory Power From Experts To Judges

Update: 2024-07-022
Share

Digest

The NPR Politics Podcast discusses the Supreme Court's recent term, which has been marked by significant and controversial decisions. The court's decisions have broadened presidential powers, made it more difficult to regulate industries and workplaces, and raised concerns about ethics and transparency. The podcast highlights the impact of these decisions on the upcoming presidential election, particularly regarding the potential for the court to become a key issue for voters. The podcast also delves into the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing legal principle that allowed courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The court's decision to overturn Chevron deference could have significant implications for the regulatory landscape, potentially leading to a more conservative approach to regulation. The podcast concludes by discussing the potential impact of these decisions on the future of the Supreme Court, particularly in light of the age of some of the justices and the possibility of future vacancies.

Outlines

00:00:00
Introduction

This Chapter introduces the NPR Politics Podcast and its focus on the Supreme Court's recent term. It also provides context for the episode by mentioning the upcoming election season and the importance of sorting through the news.

00:00:53
Supreme Court's Term: A Historic One

This Chapter delves into the Supreme Court's recent term, highlighting its significance and the controversies surrounding it. The podcast discusses the court's decisions on presidential powers, regulations, and ethics, emphasizing the impact of these decisions on the political landscape and the upcoming election.

00:09:58
Chevron Deference Overturned: Implications for Regulations

This Chapter focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing legal principle that allowed courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The podcast explains the history of Chevron deference, its impact on regulatory agencies, and the potential consequences of its overturn.

00:15:26
Conclusion

This Chapter concludes the podcast by summarizing the key takeaways from the discussion, emphasizing the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decisions on the future of the regulatory landscape and the upcoming election.

Keywords

Supreme Court
The highest federal court in the United States, responsible for interpreting the Constitution and federal laws. It consists of nine justices appointed for life by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court's decisions have a profound impact on American society and law.

Chevron deference
A legal doctrine that allows courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. This doctrine was established in the 1984 case Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. The Supreme Court's recent decision to overturn Chevron deference could have significant implications for the regulatory landscape.

Presidential powers
The powers granted to the President of the United States by the Constitution and federal law. These powers include the ability to veto legislation, appoint federal judges, command the armed forces, and negotiate treaties. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have broadened presidential powers, raising concerns about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.

Regulations
Rules or laws that govern the conduct of individuals, businesses, and government agencies. Regulations are often created by administrative agencies to implement statutes passed by Congress. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have made it more difficult to regulate industries and workplaces, potentially leading to a more conservative approach to regulation.

Ethics
Moral principles that guide behavior. In the context of the Supreme Court, ethics refers to the conduct of justices and their spouses, particularly regarding conflicts of interest and the acceptance of gifts. The Supreme Court has been under increased scrutiny regarding ethics in recent years, raising concerns about the integrity of the court.

Administrative state
The system of government agencies that implement and enforce laws passed by Congress. The administrative state has been a target of conservatives who argue that it is too powerful and interferes with individual liberty. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have been seen as victories for conservatives in their efforts to limit the power of the administrative state.

Statute of limitations
The time period within which a legal action must be filed. The Supreme Court's recent decision to extend the statute of limitations for challenging agency regulations could have significant implications for the regulatory landscape, potentially leading to more challenges to existing regulations.

Donald Trump
The 45th President of the United States (2017-2021). Trump is a controversial figure who has been accused of corruption, abuse of power, and inciting violence. He is currently running for president again in 2024.

Joe Biden
The 46th President of the United States (2021-present). Biden is a Democrat who is running for re-election in 2024. He is known for his experience in government and his focus on issues such as climate change, healthcare, and education.

2024 presidential election
The upcoming presidential election in the United States, scheduled for November 5, 2024. The election is expected to be highly contested, with several key issues at stake, including the economy, healthcare, and the Supreme Court.

Q&A

  • What are some of the key decisions made by the Supreme Court in its recent term?

    The Supreme Court made several significant decisions, including broadening presidential powers, making it more difficult to regulate industries and workplaces, and raising concerns about ethics and transparency. These decisions have been highly controversial and have led to increased scrutiny of the court.

  • What is Chevron deference and why is its overturn significant?

    Chevron deference is a legal doctrine that allowed courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference could have significant implications for the regulatory landscape, potentially leading to a more conservative approach to regulation.

  • How could the Supreme Court's decisions impact the upcoming presidential election?

    The Supreme Court's decisions could have a significant impact on the upcoming election, particularly regarding the potential for the court to become a key issue for voters. The court's decisions on presidential powers, regulations, and ethics could motivate voters to support candidates who share their views on these issues.

  • What are some of the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference?

    The overturn of Chevron deference could lead to a more conservative approach to regulation, potentially making it more difficult for agencies to implement and enforce regulations. It could also lead to more challenges to existing regulations, as groups that disagree with them may now have more opportunities to challenge them in court.

  • What are some of the concerns about ethics and transparency surrounding the Supreme Court?

    Concerns about ethics and transparency have been raised regarding the conduct of justices and their spouses, particularly regarding conflicts of interest and the acceptance of gifts. These concerns have led to increased scrutiny of the court and have raised questions about the integrity of the institution.

  • How could the age of some of the justices impact the future of the Supreme Court?

    The age of some of the justices could have a significant impact on the future of the court, as it raises the possibility of future vacancies. If a new president were to appoint justices who share their ideological views, it could significantly shift the balance of power on the court.

  • What are some of the key issues that are likely to be at stake in the 2024 presidential election?

    The 2024 presidential election is expected to be highly contested, with several key issues at stake, including the economy, healthcare, and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have made it a more prominent issue in the election, as voters are likely to be more aware of the court's impact on their lives.

Show Notes

In our wrap of the Supreme Court term, we reflect on the huge number of consequential rulings and explain some of the cases we initially did not have time to cover — including three that will dramatically reshape how financial, environmental and all other regulations work in the United States going forward.

This episode: national political correspondent Sarah McCammon, legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg, and senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro.

The podcast is produced by Jeongyoon Han, Casey Morell and Kelli Wessinger. Our intern is Bria Suggs. Our editor is Eric McDaniel. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.

Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy
Comments 
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Supreme Court Shifts Regulatory Power From Experts To Judges

Supreme Court Shifts Regulatory Power From Experts To Judges