![TIMES NEWSPAPERS Ltd v FLOOD; FROST AND OTHERS v MGN Ltd; MILLER v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2017] UKSC 33](https://privacylawbarrister.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/privacy_law_barrister_podcast_art.jpg?fit=3000%2C3000 "TIMES NEWSPAPERS Ltd v FLOOD; FROST AND OTHERS v MGN Ltd; MILLER v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2017] UKSC 33")
TIMES NEWSPAPERS Ltd v FLOOD; FROST AND OTHERS v MGN Ltd; MILLER v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2017] UKSC 33
Update: 2017-09-16
Description
Summary
The Supreme Court considered three appeals; all involving the question of whether or not the costs regime involving Conditional Fee Agreements (‘CFA’s’) and After the Event Insurance (ATE’s) infringed a newspaper’s Article 10 rights.
The cases and legislation mentioned, or made reference to, in this podcast are:
Campbell v MGN (No 2) [2005] UKHL 61
MGN v United Kingdom 39401/04 [2011] ECHR 919
Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd (No 3) [2015] 1 WLR 3485
Access to Justice Act 1999
Article 4, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (Commencement No 5 and Saving Provision) Order 2013 (SI 2103/77)
Comments
In Channel
![Podcast: WM Morrison Supermarket plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents) [2020] UKSC12](https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d07dfce3af53aa5fdb3b8b0fbc155e6f?s=96&d=retro&r=G "Podcast: WM Morrison Supermarket plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents) [2020] UKSC12")
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
x
