DiscoverMark Levin PodcastThe Best Of Mark Levin - 9/14/24
The Best Of Mark Levin - 9/14/24

The Best Of Mark Levin - 9/14/24

Update: 2024-09-142
Share

Digest

Mark Levin, a conservative radio host, discusses the upcoming election and his concerns about Kamala Harris' candidacy. He criticizes her lack of concrete plans on key issues like the economy, immigration, and crime, arguing that the media's focus on her performance is misleading. Levin also criticizes the media's bias towards Harris and their obsession with debates and polls, arguing that they distract from the real issues. He expresses disappointment with Republican politicians who have endorsed Harris, believing they are betraying their principles. Levin refutes the claim that Ronald Reagan would not have supported Donald Trump, highlighting the hypocrisy of never-Trumpers who now back Harris. He urges voters to be selfish in their voting decisions, focusing on what is in the best interests of their families and their future. Levin contrasts the voting motivations of the left with those of conservatives, arguing that the left votes for what they want to take from others, while conservatives vote for what is best for their families and the country. He uses California as an example of what America could become under a Harris presidency, criticizing the state's political environment and warning that Harris' policies would lead to a similar outcome for the entire country.

Outlines

00:00:00
Introduction and Concerns

Mark Levin discusses his current situation and emphasizes his commitment to his work and his responsibility to his listeners. He introduces his concerns about the upcoming election and Kamala Harris' candidacy.

00:00:10
The Upcoming Debate and Media Bias

Levin discusses the upcoming debate between President Trump and Kamala Harris, highlighting the importance of preparation and the media's role in shaping the narrative. He criticizes the media's bias towards Harris and predicts their spin on the debate.

00:11:19
Media's Reaction to the Debate and Harris' Lack of Substance

Levin analyzes the media's reaction to the debate, suggesting that they are ecstatic about Harris' performance because she attacked Trump and appealed to their biases. He argues that the media's celebration is irrelevant to the actual issues and voters' concerns. He criticizes Harris for failing to provide concrete plans on key issues like the economy, immigration, and crime.

00:21:38
Controversial Bills and Political Discourse

Levin discusses a controversial bill that could put consumer credit card data at risk of being hacked. He criticizes the bill's potential to undermine security measures and benefit corporate mega-stores. He mocks the media's obsession with debating whether there should be another debate, arguing that it's a distraction from the real issues.

00:25:54
Republican Endorsements and Reagan vs. Trump

Levin expresses his disappointment with Republican politicians who have endorsed Kamala Harris, arguing that they are betraying their principles and the interests of their constituents. He criticizes their lack of concern for key issues and their willingness to empower the Democrat party. He refutes the claim that Ronald Reagan would not have supported Donald Trump, arguing that their policies are remarkably similar.

00:34:40
Substance Over Spectacle and a Call for Selfish Voting

Levin expresses his frustration with the media's focus on debates, polls, and power rankings, arguing that they distract from the real issues and the substance of the candidates' positions. He emphasizes the need for voters to focus on the candidates' plans and their impact on their lives. He urges voters to be selfish in their voting decisions, focusing on what is in the best interests of their families and their future.

00:51:00
The Left's Selfish Agenda and the California Model

Levin contrasts the voting motivations of the left with those of conservatives. He argues that the left votes for what they want to take from others, while conservatives vote for what is best for their families and the country. He criticizes the left's desire to redistribute wealth and control society. He uses California as an example of what America could become under a Harris presidency, criticizing the state's political environment and warning that Harris' policies would lead to a similar outcome for the entire country.

Keywords

**Quad**


A quad is a large muscle group in the thigh, responsible for extending the leg. A torn quad is a common injury, often caused by sudden forceful movements or overuse.

**Marxist Islamist**


A term used to describe individuals or groups who combine Marxist ideology with Islamic beliefs. This combination often involves advocating for social justice and economic equality within an Islamic framework.

**DEI**


DEI stands for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It refers to a set of principles and practices aimed at creating a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive environment in organizations and society.

**Never-Trumpers**


A term used to describe individuals, particularly within the Republican Party, who oppose Donald Trump and his policies. They often criticize Trump's rhetoric, style, and approach to politics.

**Administrative State**


A term used to describe the growth and influence of unelected bureaucrats in government. It refers to the increasing power of agencies and regulations in shaping policy and affecting citizens' lives.

**Wealth Tax**


A tax levied on the net worth of individuals or corporations, typically targeting those with high levels of wealth. It is often proposed as a way to reduce income inequality and fund social programs.

**CRT**


CRT stands for Critical Race Theory. It is a framework for understanding how race and racism are embedded in social structures and institutions. It has become a controversial topic in education and politics.

**Potemkin Voting System**


A term used to describe a voting system that appears legitimate but is actually rigged or manipulated to produce a desired outcome. It is often associated with authoritarian regimes.

Q&A

  • What are some of the key issues that Mark Levin believes are important for voters to consider in the upcoming election?

    Levin emphasizes the importance of the economy, immigration, and crime. He argues that voters should focus on the candidates' plans for addressing these issues and their impact on their lives.

  • How does Mark Levin criticize the media's coverage of the debate and the election in general?

    Levin criticizes the media's bias towards Kamala Harris and their tendency to focus on spectacle and spin rather than substance. He argues that the media's coverage is often misleading and does not accurately reflect the real issues at stake.

  • What is Mark Levin's main argument against the idea of another debate?

    Levin believes that another debate would be a waste of time and a distraction from the real issues. He argues that Kamala Harris has already had her chance to present her positions and that voters should focus on the substance of her policies rather than her performance in a debate.

  • What does Mark Levin mean when he urges voters to be "selfish" in their voting decisions?

    Levin encourages voters to prioritize their own families and their well-being when making their voting choices. He believes that voters should consider how the candidates' policies will affect their lives and their future, rather than being swayed by political rhetoric or ideology.

  • What are some of the potential consequences of a Harris presidency, according to Mark Levin?

    Levin warns that a Harris presidency would lead to a significant increase in government control over people's lives, including their finances, their speech, and their ability to travel. He believes that her policies would have a negative impact on the economy, immigration, and crime, and that they would fundamentally alter the character of the United States.

Show Notes

This week on the Mark Levin Show, Kamala Harris spent a week preparing for the debate with Donald Trump because she needs to be scripted in order to hide her Marxist Islamist chameleon true self. The media are ecstatic over Tuesday night’s debate and feel like Kamala Harris delivered a knockout punch to Donald Trump because to Harris this was a debate to her real constituency: the media. Harris was trained for this debate to appeal to the media that she has been avoiding and came ready with her cheap shots and 25 lies about Trump. We have no idea what Harris’s plans are for crime, immigration, or tackling inflation and reducing the prices of things like food, gasoline, vehicles, and housing – all things that affect the American people. The new debate in the media is whether there should be a second debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. All Trump talks about in his rallies and the debates are the issues, but all Kamala does is avoid talking about the issues whether it's to the media or the American voters who still do not know what she stands for. Ronald Reagan was hated by the same people who hate Trump today, including the Bushes, Cheneys, RINO Republicans, and the media. It is time for us to be selfish and vote for the person who will return our country and the world to normalcy, and that person is Donald Trump. Also, Israel is in a very difficult position in the Middle East surrounded by terrorist groups and countries that want to destroy them, and they are all aided by the Biden/Harris administration.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The Best Of Mark Levin - 9/14/24

The Best Of Mark Levin - 9/14/24

Cumulus Podcast Network