DiscoverKiller PsycheThe Case of Kouri Richins: Will the Defense Struggle to Prove Her Claim of Innocence?
The Case of Kouri Richins: Will the Defense Struggle to Prove Her Claim of Innocence?

The Case of Kouri Richins: Will the Defense Struggle to Prove Her Claim of Innocence?

Update: 2024-06-071
Share

Digest

This episode delves into the ongoing case of Corey Richens, a Utah mother accused of murdering her husband, Eric, by poisoning him with fentanyl. The episode explores the unusual circumstances surrounding the case, including the withdrawal of Richens' attorneys due to an "irreconcilable and non-wavable situation." Legal analyst Josh Ritter sheds light on the potential reasons behind the attorneys' withdrawal, suggesting that Richens' behavior while in custody may have been a contributing factor. The episode also examines the implications of jailhouse phone calls made by Richens to her attorneys, which are now under scrutiny. Ritter discusses the legal doctrine of "fruits of the poisonous tree" and how it could impact the admissibility of evidence obtained from these calls. The episode further explores the potential impact of these calls on Richens' chances of acquittal, highlighting the power of a defendant's own words as evidence. The episode concludes with a discussion of the prosecution's case, which includes evidence of attempted murder, financial motives, and witness testimony. Richens' defense, which centers around the possibility of an accidental overdose, is also examined. The episode highlights the complexities of the case and the potential challenges facing both the prosecution and the defense.

Outlines

00:00:00
Introduction

This Chapter introduces the case of Corey Richens, a Utah mother accused of murdering her husband, Eric, by poisoning him with fentanyl. The episode sets the stage for a discussion about the unusual circumstances surrounding the case, including the withdrawal of Richens' attorneys and the implications of jailhouse phone calls made by Richens to her attorneys.

00:03:08
Attorney Withdrawal and Jailhouse Phone Calls

This Chapter delves into the reasons behind the withdrawal of Corey Richens' attorneys, exploring the potential impact of her behavior while in custody. The episode also examines the implications of jailhouse phone calls made by Richens to her attorneys, discussing the legal doctrine of "fruits of the poisonous tree" and its potential impact on the admissibility of evidence obtained from these calls.

00:09:06
Evidence and Defense Strategies

This Chapter explores the evidence presented by the prosecution, including evidence of attempted murder, financial motives, and witness testimony. The episode also examines Richens' defense, which centers around the possibility of an accidental overdose. The episode highlights the complexities of the case and the potential challenges facing both the prosecution and the defense.

00:13:22
Conclusion and Advice

This Chapter concludes the episode with a final discussion of the case and offers advice to listeners about the importance of seeking help if they suspect their spouse is being poisoned.

Keywords

Corey Richens


Corey Richens is a Utah mother who is facing murder charges for the death of her husband, Eric. She is accused of poisoning him with fentanyl. She maintains her innocence and claims that her husband was a drug user. Her case has been complicated by her post-arrest behavior, including alleged witness tampering and attorney withdrawal.

Fentanyl


Fentanyl is a powerful synthetic opioid that is often used to treat severe pain. It is also a highly addictive drug that can be deadly, even in small doses. Fentanyl is often mixed with other drugs, such as heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine, which can make it even more dangerous. In this case, Corey Richens is accused of poisoning her husband with fentanyl.

Witness Tampering


Witness tampering is a crime that occurs when someone tries to influence a witness's testimony in a legal case. This can include trying to persuade a witness to lie, to withhold information, or to change their story. In this case, Corey Richens is accused of attempting to tamper with witnesses by trying to influence their testimony about the circumstances surrounding her husband's death.

Attorney-Client Privilege


Attorney-client privilege is a legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between a lawyer and their client. This privilege is designed to encourage open and honest communication between lawyers and their clients, so that clients can receive effective legal representation. In this case, the attorney-client privilege is being challenged because of the jailhouse phone calls made by Corey Richens to her attorneys. The prosecution is arguing that these calls are not protected by the privilege because they were recorded and because Richens was attempting to manipulate the way her case was being handled.

Fruits of the Poisonous Tree


The fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine is a legal rule that prohibits the use of evidence that is obtained illegally. This doctrine is based on the idea that evidence that is obtained illegally is tainted and should not be admitted in court. In this case, the fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine could be used to challenge the admissibility of evidence obtained from the jailhouse phone calls made by Corey Richens to her attorneys. The defense could argue that these calls were illegally obtained because they were recorded without Richens' consent. If the court agrees with this argument, then any evidence obtained from these calls would be inadmissible.

Q&A

  • Why did Corey Richens' attorneys withdraw from the case?

    The attorneys withdrew from the case due to an "irreconcilable and non-wavable situation." This suggests that there were significant disagreements between the attorneys and their client, possibly related to Richens' behavior while in custody.

  • What are the implications of the jailhouse phone calls made by Corey Richens to her attorneys?

    The jailhouse phone calls are now under scrutiny, and the prosecution is considering using them as evidence. The legal doctrine of "fruits of the poisonous tree" could impact the admissibility of evidence obtained from these calls, as the defense could argue that they were illegally obtained. The calls could also be used to show consciousness of guilt on Richens' part.

  • What is the prosecution's case against Corey Richens?

    The prosecution's case includes evidence of attempted murder, financial motives, and witness testimony. They allege that Richens poisoned her husband with fentanyl and that she had a motive to do so, as she was facing financial difficulties and had taken out life insurance policies on her husband. They also have a witness who will testify that Richens procured the fentanyl used in the case.

  • What is Corey Richens' defense?

    Richens' defense is that her husband's death was an accidental overdose. They are arguing that fentanyl is a dangerous drug and that people often accidentally overdose on it. They are also trying to use the fact that Richens' husband was a drug user to support their claim that his death was accidental.

  • What is the potential impact of the jailhouse phone calls on Corey Richens' chances of acquittal?

    The jailhouse phone calls could have a significant impact on Richens' chances of acquittal. If the prosecution is able to use these calls as evidence, it could be very damaging to her case. The calls could show consciousness of guilt and could also be used to impeach her testimony if she decides to take the stand.

Show Notes

In 2022, after the sudden death of her husband, Utah mother Kouri Richins released a children’s book about coping with grief. But shortly after the book garnered national attention, Kouri was charged with murder. Prosecutors say that she intentionally killed her own husband, but she claims she is innocent. Just a few weeks ago, Kouri’s attorneys withdrew from her case – and with her newly made public statements and previous jailhouse calls under the spotlight, there are questions now more than ever about how her case will play out in court. In today’s Headlines, Candice is joined by legal analyst Josh Ritter to discuss possible reasons why her counsel withdrew, and how Kouri’s own words could impact her case if it goes to trial. 


Need more Killer Psyche? With Wondery+, enjoy exclusive episodes, early access to new ones, and they’re always ad-free. Start your free trial in the Wondery App or visit wondery.app.link/TI5l5KzpDLb now.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The Case of Kouri Richins: Will the Defense Struggle to Prove Her Claim of Innocence?

The Case of Kouri Richins: Will the Defense Struggle to Prove Her Claim of Innocence?