Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.10.245258v1?rss=1

Authors: Hao, Y., Mabry, M. E., Edger, P., Freeling, M., Zheng, C., Jin, L., VanBuren, R., Colle, M., An, H., Abrahams, R. S., Qi, X., Barry, K., Daum, C., Shu, S., Schmutz, J., Sankoff, D., Barker, M. S., Lyons, E., Pires, J. C., Conant, G. C.

Abstract:
The members of the tribe Brassiceae share an ancient whole genome triplication (WGT), and plants in this tribe display extraordinarily high within-species morphological diversity. One proposed model for the formation of these hexaploid Brassiceae is that they result from a "two-step" pair of hybridizations. However, direct evidence supporting this model of formation has been lacking; meanwhile, the evolutionary and functional constraints that drove evolution after the hexaploidy are even less understood. Here we report a new genome sequence of Crambe hispanica, a species sister to most sequenced Brassiceae. After adding this new genome to three others that are also descended from the ancient hexaploidy, we traced the history of gene loss after the WGT using a phylogenomic pipeline called POInT (the Polyploidy Orthology Inference Tool). This approach allowed us to confirm the two-step model of hexaploidy formation and to assign statistical confidence to our parental "subgenome" assignments for >90,000 individual genes. We show that each subgenome has a statistically distinguishable rate of homeolog losses. Moreover, our modeling allowed us to infer that there was a significant temporal gap between the two allopolyploidizations, with about one third of the total shared gene losses between the four analyzed Brassiceae species in the first two subgenomes prior to the arrival of the third subgenome. There is little indication of functional distinction between the three subgenomes: the individual subgenomes show no patterns of functional enrichment, no excess of shared protein-protein or metabolic interactions between their members, and no biases in their likelihood of having experienced a recent selective sweep. We propose a "mix and match" model of allopolyploidy, where subgenome origin drives homeolog loss propensities but where genes from different subgenomes function together without difficulty.

Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info