The DOJ's case against Apple
Digest
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the company has monopolized the smartphone market by creating a "walled garden" ecosystem that locks users in. The DOJ argues that Apple's practices, such as limiting the functionality of non-Apple smartwatches on iPhones and stifling the rollout of super apps and cloud-based gaming apps, have stifled competition and harmed consumers. Apple denies the DOJ's allegations, arguing that its practices are necessary to maintain a high-quality user experience and that the lawsuit will threaten its ability to innovate. Apple also points to the global market share of Android phones, which far exceeds that of iPhones, as evidence that it does not have a monopoly. One challenge for the DOJ will be proving that Apple's alleged tactics have actually resulted in monopoly power. The DOJ argues that iPhones account for a significant portion of the US smartphone market, but Apple disputes this figure, claiming that the DOJ's calculation is based on revenue rather than the number of phones sold. The DOJ's ultimate goal in the lawsuit is to promote competition in the smartphone market. The DOJ believes that competition drives innovation and benefits consumers. However, the case is likely to be protracted, and it may take a long time before a final resolution is reached.
Outlines
Apple's Antitrust Trial: A Deep Dive
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, alleging that the company has monopolized the smartphone market by creating a "walled garden" ecosystem that locks users in. The DOJ argues that Apple's practices, such as limiting the functionality of non-Apple smartwatches on iPhones and stifling the rollout of super apps and cloud-based gaming apps, have stifled competition and harmed consumers. Apple denies the DOJ's allegations, arguing that its practices are necessary to maintain a high-quality user experience and that the lawsuit will threaten its ability to innovate. Apple also points to the global market share of Android phones, which far exceeds that of iPhones, as evidence that it does not have a monopoly.
Challenges and Goals of the Lawsuit
One challenge for the DOJ will be proving that Apple's alleged tactics have actually resulted in monopoly power. The DOJ argues that iPhones account for a significant portion of the US smartphone market, but Apple disputes this figure, claiming that the DOJ's calculation is based on revenue rather than the number of phones sold. The DOJ's ultimate goal in the lawsuit is to promote competition in the smartphone market. The DOJ believes that competition drives innovation and benefits consumers. However, the case is likely to be protracted, and it may take a long time before a final resolution is reached.
Keywords
Antitrust Law
Antitrust law is a body of law that regulates the conduct of businesses to prevent monopolies and promote competition. It aims to ensure that consumers have access to a variety of goods and services at fair prices.
Walled Garden
A walled garden is a closed ecosystem where users are restricted to using only the products and services offered within that ecosystem. Apple's iPhone ecosystem is often described as a walled garden because it limits the functionality of non-Apple products and services.
Super Apps
Super apps are mobile applications that combine multiple functions into one app, such as messaging, social media, payments, and e-commerce. The DOJ alleges that Apple has stifled the rollout of super apps in its app store.
Cloud-Based Gaming
Cloud-based gaming allows users to stream video games to their devices, rather than downloading and installing them locally. The DOJ alleges that Apple has limited the availability of cloud-based gaming apps in its app store.
Monopoly Power
Monopoly power refers to the ability of a company to control a significant portion of a market and to set prices without facing significant competition. The DOJ argues that Apple has monopoly power in the smartphone market, while Apple denies this claim.
Q&A
What are the main allegations against Apple in the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit?
The DOJ alleges that Apple has monopolized the smartphone market by creating a "walled garden" ecosystem that locks users in. The DOJ argues that Apple's practices, such as limiting the functionality of non-Apple smartwatches on iPhones and stifling the rollout of super apps and cloud-based gaming apps, have stifled competition and harmed consumers.
How does Apple respond to the DOJ's allegations?
Apple denies the DOJ's allegations, arguing that its practices are necessary to maintain a high-quality user experience and that the lawsuit will threaten its ability to innovate. Apple also points to the global market share of Android phones, which far exceeds that of iPhones, as evidence that it does not have a monopoly.
What are the challenges in proving Apple's monopoly power?
One challenge for the DOJ will be proving that Apple's alleged tactics have actually resulted in monopoly power. The DOJ argues that iPhones account for a significant portion of the US smartphone market, but Apple disputes this figure, claiming that the DOJ's calculation is based on revenue rather than the number of phones sold.
What are the DOJ's goals in the lawsuit?
The DOJ's ultimate goal in the lawsuit is to promote competition in the smartphone market. The DOJ believes that competition drives innovation and benefits consumers. However, the case is likely to be protracted, and it may take a long time before a final resolution is reached.
Show Notes
Related episodes:
How Fortnite brought Google to its knees (Apple / Spotify)
Can an old law bring down grocery prices? (Apple / Spotify)
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.
Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
Table of contents
United States
