DiscoverWrite About NowThe NYT called Gen X Obsolete. That Didn't Go Well.
The NYT called Gen X Obsolete. That Didn't Go Well.

The NYT called Gen X Obsolete. That Didn't Go Well.

Update: 2025-04-08
Share

Description

When the New York Times declared it was "the end of work as we knew it" for Gen X, it did not feel fine. The story called the generation obsolete, irrelevant, and even likened them to candlestick makers in the age of electricity. Seriously? The article sparked a firestorm, prompting host Jonathan Small to write a viral Substack response that only raised the temperature. Now, Dana DuBois—fellow Gen X-er, writer, alt-rock aficionado—joins the show to talk about why the article sparked so much rage, what it got dead wrong, and how Gen X is not just surviving but reinventing midlife on their own terms. 

Read Jon's response on Substack here

Read the original NYT story here.

All things Dana DuBois can be found here

Comments 
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The NYT called Gen X Obsolete. That Didn't Go Well.

The NYT called Gen X Obsolete. That Didn't Go Well.