DiscoverThe Home FrontThe natural law principle behind rejecting vaccine mandates; what fresh hell is "circulatory death"; the Lawlers go to the Sterling Fair
The natural law principle behind rejecting vaccine mandates; what fresh hell is "circulatory death"; the Lawlers go to the Sterling Fair

The natural law principle behind rejecting vaccine mandates; what fresh hell is "circulatory death"; the Lawlers go to the Sterling Fair

Update: 2025-09-12
Share

Description

Show Notes:

Part One:

* President Trump on Truth Social, about the Covid shots: “…I hope OPERATION WARP SPEED was as “BRILLIANT” as many say it was. If not, we all want to know about it, and why??? Thank you for your attention to this very important matter! President DJT”

* Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. invokes compulsory vaccination as a principle to justify the verdict regarding sterilization laws in the landmark case, Buck v. Bell, 1926, quoted in this excellent article analyzing vaccine mandates by Roman Bystrianyk. He also looks into the Jacobson case that forms the basis of today’s mandates.

* The full announcement of Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Surgeon General of Florida, announcing his department’s determination to eliminate vaccine mandates in that state entirely.

* My post with resources on the questions about vaccine safety and resources including about moral issues:

Part Two:

Perspectives on organ donation— all from the New York Times:

• The Times reports on the federal investigation that uncovered abuses in organ procurement. Doctors Were Preparing to Remove Their Organs. Then They Woke Up (New York Times, June 2025)

• Then the Times adds its own report, underlining the problem. A Push for More Organ Transplants Is Putting Donors at Risk (New York Times, July 2025)

• No doubt in response, three cardiologists write an op-ed in the Times, arguing that the solution is to accept an even broader definition of “death” so that more organs can be harvested! Donor Organs Are Too Rare. We Need a New Definition of Death (New York Times, July 2025)

• Actually doctors have advanced a new definition of “death”— to be used alongside the spurious diagnosis of “brain death.” Removing organs after a proclamation of “circulatory death” was recognized quickly as “kind of a creepy thing to be doing.” But it’s still being done. When Does Life Stop? A New Way of Harvesting Organs Divides Doctors (New York Times, November 2023)

Do you look forward to our podcast? Do not hesitate to subscribe! It’s free! Or you can choose to support us financially if you are able— either way, we appreciate you!

Your paid subscription means a lot to us and helps us continue our work.

Want to tell a friend? Please do!

Don’t wish to take out a paid subscription just now? We understand!

How about this, if you enjoyed this episode:



Get full access to Happy Despite Them at leilamarielawler.substack.com/subscribe
Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

The natural law principle behind rejecting vaccine mandates; what fresh hell is "circulatory death"; the Lawlers go to the Sterling Fair

The natural law principle behind rejecting vaccine mandates; what fresh hell is "circulatory death"; the Lawlers go to the Sterling Fair

Leila Marie Lawler and Phil Lawler