Why Democrats have little leverage to reform ICE
Digest
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been operating without full funding for over 60 days due to a congressional dispute. Democrats are withholding funds to push for immigration reform, but their leverage is limited by previous large, unrestricted appropriations. Republicans propose a three-year funding plan for immigration agencies, bypassing annual oversight. This ongoing appropriations fight, along with votes on the War Powers Resolution concerning Iran and a Supreme Court ruling on illegal tariffs, highlights a concerning trend of Congress relinquishing its constitutional powers to the executive branch, potentially leading to executive overreach and tyranny. Recent developments include a ceasefire in the Iran conflict, an open Strait of Hormuz, and a portal for tariff refunds, though uncertainty remains. Personal reflections on music, history, and political metaphors conclude the discussion.
Outlines

DHS Funding Dispute and Congressional Power
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) faces a funding crisis due to a congressional dispute, with Democrats withholding funds to push for immigration reform. This situation, coupled with proposed long-term funding for immigration agencies and a Supreme Court ruling on tariffs, reveals a broader trend of Congress ceding its constitutional powers to the executive branch, raising concerns about potential executive tyranny and loss of oversight.

War Powers, International Conflict, and Economic Impact
Congressional Democrats have forced votes on the War Powers Resolution regarding the conflict in Iran, aiming to limit presidential war-making power. Repeated failures to pass these resolutions may embolden the White House. Recent developments include a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, an open Strait of Hormuz despite a U.S. naval blockade on Iran, leading to decreased oil prices and a rise in the stock market.

Tariff Rulings, Refunds, and Congressional Relinquishment of Power
A Supreme Court ruling declared some Trump tariffs illegal, prompting the launch of a portal for companies to claim refunds. This, along with the DHS funding dispute and War Powers Resolution votes, underscores a pattern of Congress relinquishing its constitutional powers to the executive branch, posing a risk of executive tyranny.

Personal Reflections and Historical Anecdotes
The hosts share personal reflections, including a musical discovery, a story about President Garfield's assassination, and a relatable political metaphor.
Keywords
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
The U.S. federal government department responsible for public security, formed after the September 11 attacks.
War Powers Resolution
A congressional resolution limiting the president's ability to commit armed forces without congressional consent.
Appropriations Process
The congressional process for allocating government funds, a key check on executive power.
Executive Branch Tyranny
The potential for the executive branch to overstep its constitutional authority due to a lack of congressional oversight.
Tariff Refunds
Repayment of tariffs deemed unlawful by a court, with procedures for companies to claim back payments.
Congressional Oversight
Congress's role in monitoring and scrutinizing the executive branch and government operations.
Immigration Reform
Proposed changes to laws and policies governing immigration in the United States.
Q&A
What is the current status of the Department of Homeland Security's funding?
The Department of Homeland Security has been operating without full funding for over 60 days due to a dispute in Congress. A Senate-approved bill to fund the agency, excluding immigration enforcement, has stalled in the House.
How does the War Powers Resolution aim to limit presidential power?
The War Powers Resolution allows Congress to withdraw the president from conflict with a vote and sets a 60-day timeline for withdrawal if Congress hasn't formally authorized the engagement. This aims to balance the president's role as commander-in-chief with Congress's power to declare war.
Why is Congress's leverage over ICE limited despite the shutdown?
Congress's leverage is limited because ICE and other DHS agencies received a large sum of money ($75 billion) last year with few restrictions. This funding allows them to continue operations and pay employees, reducing the pressure Democrats hoped to exert through the shutdown.
What are the concerns regarding the proposed three-year funding for immigration agencies?
The proposal to fund ICE and Border Patrol separately for three years bypasses the annual appropriations process. This raises concerns about Congress relinquishing its oversight authority and potentially granting these agencies significant, unrestricted funding without annual scrutiny.
What is the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's tariffs?
The Supreme Court ruled that some of Trump's tariffs were illegal. This has led to the creation of a portal for companies to claim refunds for these tariffs, though the process and potential appeals by the administration introduce uncertainty.
What is the overarching concern about Congress's relationship with the executive branch discussed in the podcast?
The podcast highlights a recurring theme of Congress relinquishing its constitutional powers to the executive branch across various issues like DHS funding, war powers, and tariffs. This trend is seen as a risk that could lead to executive branch tyranny if not addressed.
Show Notes
This episode: voting correspondent Miles Parks, immigration policy correspondent Ximena Bustillo, congressional reporter Sam Gringlas and White House correspondent Danielle Kurtzleben.
This podcast was produced by Casey Morell and edited by Rachel Baye.
Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.
Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.
See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.
NPR Privacy Policy























