DiscoverThe Political Scene | The New YorkerWill Kamala Harris’s Debate Win Be Enough to Move the Needle?
Will Kamala Harris’s Debate Win Be Enough to Move the Needle?

Will Kamala Harris’s Debate Win Be Enough to Move the Needle?

Update: 2024-09-115
Share

Digest

This podcast episode delves into the first and only debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. The hosts analyze Harris's performance, focusing on her attempts to introduce herself to undecided voters and counter Trump's attacks. They discuss Trump's tactics, including his attempts to portray Harris as a flip-flopping liberal and his extreme rhetoric on immigration. The episode also examines the debate's exchange on abortion, highlighting Harris's coherent position and Trump's seemingly contradictory stance. The hosts explore the concept of the "change candidate" and how both Harris and Trump are trying to portray themselves as agents of change. They discuss Harris's relationship with Biden and how she navigated the challenge of aligning herself with him while also presenting herself as a distinct candidate. Finally, the hosts assess Harris's overall performance in the debate, concluding that she successfully introduced herself to undecided voters and highlighted Trump's inconsistencies. They discuss the potential impact of the debate on the election and the importance of future events in shaping the race.

Outlines

00:00:00
The Debate: Harris vs. Trump

This episode analyzes the first and only debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, examining their performances, positions on key issues, and the potential impact on the election.

00:00:39
Analyzing Harris's Performance and Trump's Tactics

The podcast dives deeper into the debate, analyzing Harris's performance and Trump's tactics. The hosts discuss whether Harris successfully countered Trump's attacks and whether she was able to introduce herself to undecided voters.

00:10:12
Key Issues and Framing

The hosts discuss Harris's positions on issues like fracking and immigration, and whether she successfully countered the perception of her as a flip-flopping liberal. They also analyze Trump's framing of Harris and whether he was able to make her look extreme or out of touch.

00:16:41
The Impact of the Debate

The hosts assess Harris's overall performance in the debate, concluding that she successfully introduced herself to undecided voters and highlighted Trump's inconsistencies. They discuss the potential impact of the debate on the election and the importance of future events in shaping the race.

Keywords

Flip-flopping


A change in one's stance or opinion on a particular issue, often perceived as inconsistent or opportunistic. It is frequently used in political discourse to criticize candidates who appear to shift their positions based on public opinion or political expediency.

Undecided Voters


Voters who have not yet decided which candidate they will support in an election. They are often considered the most important group of voters, as their choices can determine the outcome of the election.

Change Candidate


A candidate who campaigns on a platform of change, promising to bring about significant alterations to the status quo. This often appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with the current state of affairs and seek a fresh approach.

Fracking


A method of extracting natural gas from shale rock by injecting a high-pressure mixture of water, sand, and chemicals. It is a controversial practice due to its potential environmental impacts.

Immigration


The movement of people from one country to another, often for economic or political reasons. It is a complex issue with significant social, economic, and political implications.

Abortion


The termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus from the uterus. It is a highly controversial issue, with strong opinions on both sides.

Extreme Rhetoric


Language that is inflammatory, divisive, and often intended to provoke strong emotions. It is often used in political discourse to mobilize supporters and demonize opponents.

Q&A

  • What were the key takeaways from the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump?

    The debate was seen as a relatively uneventful affair, with both candidates largely sticking to their established positions. Harris aimed to introduce herself to undecided voters, while Trump focused on attacking her and Biden's record.

  • Did Harris successfully counter the perception of her as a flip-flopping liberal?

    The hosts believe that Harris attempted to present herself as a moderate Democrat, but her past positions on issues like fracking and immigration were still brought up by Trump.

  • How did Trump's rhetoric on immigration, particularly his comments about migrants eating pets, affect the debate?

    The hosts believe that Trump's extreme rhetoric on immigration could alienate some Republican voters, but they also acknowledge that his stance on immigration is generally popular with the electorate.

  • How did Harris navigate the challenge of aligning herself with Biden while also presenting herself as a distinct candidate?

    Harris attempted to distance herself from Biden on certain issues, but she also acknowledged his accomplishments and sought to benefit from his popularity. The hosts believe that she successfully walked a fine line between aligning herself with Biden and presenting herself as a change candidate.

  • What is the significance of the debate in the context of the upcoming election?

    The hosts believe that the debate was a relatively minor event in the overall election cycle. They are more interested in future events that could potentially shift the momentum of the race, such as the vice presidential debate and the upcoming Taylor Swift tour.

Show Notes

Kamala Harris successfully prosecuted a case against Donald Trump on issues ranging from abortion to the January 6th insurrection at last night’s debate in Philadelphia. How will that fare with voters against Trump’s “fan service” recitation of Internet conspiracies? Tyler Foggatt sits down with the New Yorker staff writers Clare Malone and Vinson Cunningham to examine each candidate’s performance, along with a surprise Taylor Swift endorsement for Harris, and what it means with less than two months until Election Day. 

Share your thoughts on The Political Scene. As a token of our appreciation, you will be eligible to enter a prize drawing up to $1,000 after you complete the survey.

https://selfserve.decipherinc.com/survey/selfserve/222b/76152?pin=1&uBRANDLINK=4&uCHANNELLINK=2

Comments 

Table of contents

00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Will Kamala Harris’s Debate Win Be Enough to Move the Needle?

Will Kamala Harris’s Debate Win Be Enough to Move the Needle?

WNYC Studios and The New Yorker