Claim OwnershipPivotal Precedents - short summaries of major US, UK and EU legal precedents
Subscribed: 0Played: 7
Subscribe
© 2025 Pivotal Precedents - short summaries of major US, UK and EU legal precedents
Description
Welcome to Pivotal Precedents , your audio guide to landmark rulings that are shaping the legal landscape in the US, EU and UK.
We translate legalese into plain English.
Our episodes journey through time, dissecting influential cases, their verdicts, and repercussions on the legal landscape.
We rely on your subscription and support to continue delivering these insights, so please hit that subscribe button. Set sail with us on a learning journey that proves listening can be as enlightening as reading.
#PivotalPrecedents #UKLaw #LandmarkRulings #LawPodcast #LegalStudies #LawStudents #LegalHistory #CaseStudies #LegalEducation #LawLearning #Subscribe
Support: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1386949/support
26 Episodes
Reverse
Send us a textTindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police, a landmark UK Supreme Court decision exploring the boundaries of negligence law. The case questions whether the police, by responding ineffectively to a dangerous icy road, made matters worse, ultimately leading to a fatal accident. We’ll unpack the court’s reasoning on public authority liability, the duty of care, and the critical distinction between causing harm and failing to prevent it.
Send us a textThe Irish Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory quarantine scheme and the powers given to the Minister for Health and administrative reviewers. The judgment highlights the balance between protecting public health and respecting individual freedoms, particularly during emergencies.
Send us a textSupport the podcast at the cost of a single espresso ☕️🎙️😊👍Stephen Hilland was sentenced to two consecutive 12-month determinate custodial sentences on 26 May 2015, released on license on 4 February 2016.His license was revoked on 21 October 2016 due to a perceived increased risk of harm to the public, leading him to file a judicial review on grounds of discrimination compared to prisoners under indeterminate or extended custodial sentences who are recalled only if there's a ris...
Send us a textSupport the podcast at the cost of a single espresso ☕️🎙️😊👍In the case of Lifestyle Equities CV and another vs. Amazon UK Services Limited and others, the UK Supreme Court considered the complex issues of EU and UK trade mark law in the context of cross-border internet marketing and sales.Support the show
Send us a textClick here to support the podcast :)The case of Bertino vs. Public Prosecutor's Office, Italy involved the appeal against the extradition of the appellant, Bertino, to Italy to serve a sentence for a sexual offense.The central issue was whether Bertino, who was tried and convicted in absentia in Italy, should be extradited under section 20(3) of the Extradition Act 2003, despite not having the right to a retrial in Italy.Support the show
Send us a textThe judgment in Hassam and another v Rabot and another, delivered by Lord Burrows on behalf of the UK Supreme Court on March 26, 2024, focuses on assessing damages for personal injury, specifically in the context of whiplash and non-whiplash injuries.Support the show
Send us a textIn the UK Supreme Court case "Armstead v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company Limited", the appellant, Lorna Armstead, appealed against a decision regarding her claim for damages following a road traffic collision. Represented by Benjamin Williams KC and Ben Smiley, Armstead claimed £1,560 from the respondent, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company plc (RSA), represented by Lord Marks KC and Quentin Tannock.The key legal question involved whether economic loss res...
Send us a textIn the UK Supreme Court case involving Paul and others vs Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Polmear and others vs Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, and Purchase vs Ahmed, the central issue was the extent to which secondary victims can claim damages for psychiatric injuries caused by witnessing the death or serious injury of a close relative due to medical negligence.Support the show
Send us a textSupport the show
Send us a textSupport the show
Send us a textBackground:This case explored the intricacies of copyright law in the context of football pools coupons. It delved into the aspects of originality and the effort expended in compiling the coupons, probing whether they could be protected under copyright law. Ladbroke and William Hill were two of the UK's major betting companies, and the dispute arose when Ladbroke claimed that William Hill had infringed upon their copyright.Support the show
Send us a textBackground:This case revolved around the iconic Stormtrooper helmets from the "Star Wars" film series. Lucasfilm Ltd, the company behind "Star Wars," claimed that Andrew Ainsworth, who had originally produced the helmets for the first film in the 1970s, infringed their copyright by producing and selling replicas without their permission.Support the show
Send us a textBackground:This case dealt with copyright infringement in the realm of artistic works, specifically in fabric designs. Designers Guild Ltd, a company known for its original fabric and wallpaper designs, claimed that Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (trading as "Washington DC"), had infringed upon its copyright by producing and selling fabrics with designs similar to one of Designers Guild's creations.Support the show
Send us a textBackground:The case revolved around the question of copyright infringement and is often colloquially referred to as "The Da Vinci Code case". Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, two of the three authors of the non-fiction book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" (published in 1982), claimed that Dan Brown, author of the bestselling novel "The Da Vinci Code" (published in 2003), had infringed their copyright by "appropriating the architecture" of their research and ideas.Support t...
Send us a textBackground:This case centered on issues of copyright infringement. A & C Black Publishers Ltd ("Black") had produced a music book titled "The A&C Black Songbook for Schools." Black alleged that The Data & Media Company Ltd ("Data & Media") had infringed their copyright by reproducing substantial parts of their music book in a CD-ROM titled "Songs for Every Assembly."Support the show
Send us a textDive into the landmark case of Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Green with us in this enlightening episode. Explore the intricate dynamics between banks, trusts, and property rights, as we dissect the pivotal rulings and implications of this influential case. Essential listening for legal scholars, students, and anyone keen on understanding the nuances of trust property and the banking world's role within it. Join the conversation and uncover the lessons this case offers for property...
Send us a textEmbark on a journey through the intricacies of beneficial interests and property contributions in the renowned case of Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset. This episode unpacks the groundbreaking decision that has since shaped the landscape of English property law, particularly for cohabiting couples and financial arrangements. Whether you're a legal professional, a student, or just keen on understanding the interplay between financial contributions and property ownership rights, this anal...
Send us a textStep into the intricate world of housing trusts and tenant rights with our deep dive into L & Q Housing Trust v Paul. This episode sheds light on the nuances of trust housing arrangements, their implications, and the precedent this case sets for future disputes. Ideal for both legal practitioners and anyone with an interest in housing law, we unpack the facts, decisions, and broader implications. Join us for an enlightening discussion and ensure you're up-to-date with the la...
Send us a text"Unravel the complexities of cohabitation and property rights in our exploration of the landmark case, *Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53*. This episode delves into the pivotal decision that reshaped how English property law views beneficial interests for cohabiting couples. Learn about the subtle dance between joint intention, financial contributions, and evolving relationships. Perfect for legal buffs, students, or anyone navigating co-ownership dynamics. Subscribe and journey wi...
Send us a text"Join us in this episode as we dive deep into the pivotal property law case of *City of London Building Society v Flegg [1988] AC 54*. Discover how this landmark decision influences the balance between beneficial property interests and mortgagees' rights. Whether you're a property law enthusiast or just keen to understand the intricacies of overreaching and its real-world implications, this episode offers a comprehensive analysis, expert opinions, and key takeaways. Don't miss t...
Comments
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States