The Sonaar Podcaster WordPress Theme

On this episode of I’m Right, Deal With It, Andy Parrish lays out a bold argument: Christians are the “number one problem that the Republican Party faces” because they’ve allowed “every bad thing that has happened in this country to happen” by staying silent and sitting on the sidelines. He challenges the two biggest lies that have kept the church out of politics: The lie of turning people off to the gospel: Parish argues that the gospel is already challenging, and pastors aren’t afraid to confront sin. He states that being politically vocal might even “turn people on” to the church. The lie about nonprofit status: Andy busts the myth that churches will lose their tax-exempt status by getting political. He explains that religious institutions are automatically nonprofits and that most churches wouldn’t pay income taxes anyway, as they don’t turn a profit. Ultimately, Andy Parrish says it’s time for Christians to “wake up” and get involved, reminding listeners that we are called to be ambassadors of Jesus in every aspect of life, including the political arena. Listen to the full episode and find out why it’s time for churches to stop being silent and “get in the fight”.

You’ve probably seen it — the profile picture warriors on social media. They slap a blue-and-yellow filter on their accounts, hashtag “I stand with Ukraine,” swirl their box wine, and pretend they’ve made a difference. But ask them about Ukraine’s history, why the war started, or what America’s real stake is, and you’ll get blank stares. That’s because the truth about Ukraine isn’t what you’ve been told. And it’s time to lay it out. A Country Divided Since the USSR Ukraine has been split politically and culturally since 1991. The western half wants closer ties to the EU. The eastern half — especially Donbas and Crimea — has stronger ties to Russia, fueled by heritage, economics, and geography. Back in 2014, President Viktor Yanukovych chose a $15 billion deal from Russia over Europe, sparking protests and his eventual removal. The Donbas region and Crimea declared independence, aligning themselves with Russia. These aren’t just symbolic territories — they’re loaded with lithium, titanium, and other resources vital for the green energy industry. In short: the Saudi Arabia of renewables. Enter Zelensky: The PR President Fast-forward to 2019. Enter Volodymyr Zelensky — an actor, comedian, and TV personality turned politician. He campaigned on fighting corruption and reclaiming Donbas and Crimea. Instead, he’s presided over devastation: $400 billion in infrastructure damage 40% of the power grid destroyed 500,000 dead 6 million refugees And yet, Zelensky’s biggest accomplishment has been his PR tour — chest puffed out in jeans and a T-shirt in the Oval Office, demanding billions more. America’s Billions at Stake Here’s what you won’t hear on CNN: The first $75 billion U.S. check? It fully funded Ukrainian pensions and gave forgivable loans to Ukrainian businesses. To date, $350 billion of your tax dollars have gone overseas — that’s about $1,500 per taxpayer. Meanwhile, Americans face skyrocketing food, housing, and energy costs. If you’re struggling to pay for groceries, rent, or medicine, ask yourself: why are we funding pensions in Ukraine while families here suffer? Nuclear Propaganda and Fearmongering The media and politicians love to keep you afraid of “nuclear war.” But nuclear weapons are nearly 100-year-old technology. They’re less efficient and less devastating compared to modern weapons systems. It’s propaganda — designed to keep Americans silent while the billions keep flowing. America First Is Common Sense Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are right — America’s leaders should put our people first. Safety, security, and economic stability for citizens should be the government’s #1 job. Instead, Biden and the Democrats have turned Ukraine into a cash pipeline for their green energy agenda, draining Americans while selling fear. Final Thoughts Ukraine’s conflict is complicated, but one truth is simple: this war is not America’s fight. We’ve spent hundreds of billions, propped up foreign pensions, and been fed a steady diet of lies. It’s time to stop writing blank checks overseas and start putting America first. Because until our leaders start telling the truth, they’re not just failing Ukraine — they’re failing you. I’m Andy Parish. I’m right. Deal with it.

As we stepped into 2025, Americans were greeted not with celebration, but with chaos, bloodshed, and a government narrative that simply doesn’t add up. On January 1st, two nearly simultaneous attacks shook New Orleans and Las Vegas. Both involved electric vehicles, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and military veterans with suspicious backgrounds. Yet officials and the media insist there was “no connection.” Do they really think we’re that naïve? The New Orleans Attack In New Orleans, a former U.S. Army soldier named Jabbar drove an electric Ford truck down Bourbon Street, armed with IEDs and a ballistic vest. His attempt to detonate the explosives failed, but not before he opened fire on police, set fire to his Airbnb, and left 14 dead with 35 more injured. Authorities quickly linked him to ISIS, but brushed aside glaring red flags — including his suspicious travels in 2023 and his prior military service. The Las Vegas Bombing Just two hours (and one time zone) away, a Tesla Cybertruck exploded outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas. The driver, Master Sergeant Matthew Liveless Burger, was a decorated Green Beret with five tours in Afghanistan. Suffering from PTSD and personal turmoil, he weaponized his vehicle and took his own life after the attack. Seven were injured, and dozens more could have been killed. The kicker? Both men served at Fort Bragg. Both rented electric vehicles through the same app. And both detonated their vehicles with IEDs within 15 minutes of each other. Yet the official story insists these were “isolated incidents.” A Coordinated Trial Run The statistical odds of two unrelated car bombings — using electric vehicles, on the same day, by former soldiers from the same base — are essentially zero. These were coordinated attacks. More chillingly, they were likely a trial run for something far worse. Electric vehicles, especially those with autonomous driving capabilities, are uniquely vulnerable to being weaponized. With simple computer modifications, a terrorist could send a self-driving car loaded with explosives into a crowd — no human needed. This is the future we’re facing if we don’t wake up. The Real Threat: Secrecy and Silence Our government’s obsession with over-classifying information only fuels distrust. Americans have every right to know what happened and why. Instead, we’re fed the same tired script: “no coordination, nothing to see here.” But history tells a different story. Never before have two car bombings occurred in America on the same day, let alone within minutes of each other. This wasn’t coincidence. This was a warning. Final Thoughts The coordinated electric vehicle bombings of 2025 are a reminder that freedom requires vigilance. Our enemies are innovating — using technology we embrace for convenience against us. And while politicians and media downplay the truth, Americans deserve transparency. Justice will come for those responsible. But accountability must also come for those in power who failed to prevent it. Because when lives are lost, when freedom is at stake, silence is not an option.

If you turned on the new lately, you’d think tariffs are about to make avocados and beer unaffordable and plunge America into economic ruin. That’s the Left’s propaganda. The reality…

Reclaiming the Pulpit in Politics: Why Christians Must Get Involved For decades, pastors have been told that politics is off-limits—that speaking about candidates or issues from the pulpit would somehow…

The Truth About Guns and Washington’s CR Scam America is once again caught in the crossfire of two national debates: gun control after a tragic school shooting in Madison, and…

In this episode of The Andy Parrish Show: I’m Right – Deal With It, I dive into one of the most heated debates in American politics today: birthright citizenship. Many…

On New Year’s Day 2025, America witnessed two deadly attacks that our government and media want you to believe were completely unrelated. In New Orleans, a radicalized U.S. Army soldier…

In this episode of The Andy Parrish Show: I’m Right – Deal With It, I dive into one of the most heated debates in American politics today: birthright citizenship. Many conservatives—including myself at first—want to say: If you’re born here illegally, you’re not a citizen. But when I dig into the Constitution, the history of […]

Government Cover-Ups? The Truth About the New Year’s Attacks On the latest episode of I’m Right – Deal With It, I break down two New Year’s Day attacks that the government and media want you to believe are “unconnected.” Think about it. And yet—Washington and the press say there’s “no coordination.” That’s not just improbable. […]

In this episode of The Andy Parrish Show: I’m Right – Deal With It, I dig into the truth about the Ukraine war, the billions of dollars flowing overseas, and the political theater behind it all. The Media’s Half-Story Legacy media has chosen sides, turning “I stand with Ukraine” hashtags into virtue signaling while ignoring […]

The City of Onalaska has rolled out its 2025 budget proposals, and while I give them credit for transparency, the numbers reveal a troubling reality for taxpayers. On paper, officials say they’re keeping the mill rate flat. That sounds good—but here’s the catch: property values have been raised 28%. Since your taxes are tied to […]

On this episode of The Andy Parrish Show: I’m Right – Deal With It, I take apart the hysteria over tariffs and explain why they are not the boogeyman the left makes them out to be. Turn on the so-called “news” and you’d think tariffs mean the end of civilization. Politicians like Chuck Schumer run […]

The Fight Against Extremism at Columbia University: What You Need to Know In a recently sat down with Ryan Mauro, a national security expert at the Capital Research Center, to discuss the growing extremist movement in America—particularly at Columbia University. What we uncovered is deeply disturbing. Who Is Behind the Protests? While the media portrays the unrest at Columbia as a simple student protest, Ryan’s research tells a different story. He has identified radical organizations, including Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) and Students for Justice in Palestine, as key players. These groups are not just advocating for Palestinian rights—they are openly supporting Hamas, promoting civil unrest, and calling for violence. The Reality of the F1 Visa Loophole One of the leaders of these movements, Mahmoud Khalil, is not even an American citizen. He entered the country on an F1 visa and was later granted permanent resident status. Many Americans don’t realize that permanent residency does NOT guarantee citizenship, and Khalil’s participation in these protests violates the conditions of his stay. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the U.S. has every right to deport individuals who express support for terrorist organizations. Ilhan Omar’s Connection Perhaps one of the most shocking revelations is that Rep. Ilhan Omar’s daughter was actively involved in organizing these radical protests. While the media attacks conservative figures for far less, Omar’s daughter’s participation has been conveniently ignored. Why This Matters If America is to remain strong, we must recognize that our enemies don’t need to invade with tanks and missiles. They are already here, using our own laws and freedoms to sow chaos. The protests at Columbia were not spontaneous; they were meticulously planned. They involved vandalism, property destruction, and even the unlawful detainment of janitorial staff. This is not a partisan issue—it’s a national security crisis. What Can You Do? Stay Informed – The mainstream media won’t cover this, so seek out trusted sources like Capital Research Center. Speak Up – Share this information and let people know what’s happening. Support Those on the Front Lines – People like Ryan Mauro are taking the heat for exposing the truth. Send them messages of encouragement and let them know you have their back. “America isn’t just a piece of land—it’s the spirit of the people who fight to protect it. This is a fight worth having.” – Andy Parrish

What Is a Continuing Resolution? A Continuing Resolution (CR) is Congress’s way of kicking the fiscal can down the road. Instead of passing an actual budget, they pass a short-term funding bill to keep the government running—often loaded with pork and unnecessary spending. The media and politicians use scare tactics, claiming that without a CR, the government will “shut down,” leaving grandma starving in the cold and soldiers without pay. Except that’s not true. The Truth About Government Shutdowns If Congress doesn’t pass a budget or a CR, only discretionary spending is affected. Mandatory spending—which includes Social Security, Medicare, veteran benefits, and more—keeps flowing automatically. So no, grandma isn’t eating dog food, and our troops aren’t left stranded. What shuts down? Non-essential government programs Some federal employees get furloughed National parks and “symbolic” shutdown measures get rolled out to make it look worse than it is Meanwhile, the real issue—out-of-control government spending—gets ignored. Why CRs Are a Scam Here’s why conservatives should always vote NO on continuing resolutions: No accountability: Instead of debating a real budget, politicians jam funding bills full of waste and special interest projects. Debt explosion: CRs continue funding at unsustainable Biden-era levels. Where’s the change we voted for? Manipulation tactics: The fear-mongering around government shutdowns is designed to push weak-kneed Republicans into voting for more spending. Backroom deals: CRs let politicians sneak in funding boosts (like FEMA’s massive increase) without scrutiny. Trump Is Wrong on This One As a huge Trump supporter, it pains me to say this: Trump is dead wrong for endorsing this CR. He’s attacking principled conservatives like Rep. Thomas Massie, one of the few people in Washington actually fighting for fiscal sanity. We didn’t elect Trump to continue Biden-era spending levels. We elected him to cut spending and put America First. If Republicans in Congress had a spine, they’d pass a real budget instead of caving every few months. The Bottom Line CRs are designed to keep the spending machine rolling, not to serve the people. Mandatory spending keeps going, so “government shutdown” fear-mongering is a lie. If Republicans actually cared about fiscal responsibility, they’d pass a real budget and stick to it. It’s time to wake up. If you hear someone pushing a CR, tell them: “Nope. That’s not a budget. That’s a scam.” 🔹 Follow me on X @andyparrish for more unfiltered truth🔹 Subscribe to my podcast for more hard-hitting analysis And remember: I’m right. Deal with it.

The war in Ukraine isn’t as simple as the media makes it out to be. While social media warriors change their profile pictures and politicians throw billions of taxpayer dollars at the conflict, few are asking the real questions. Why is the U.S. so invested in Ukraine? What are the economic and strategic interests at play? And why does President Zelensky act more like a Hollywood PR expert than a wartime leader? In this post, we break down the history, the stakes, and the uncomfortable truths about America’s involvement in Ukraine.

Tony Evers’ Gender-Neutral Agenda: The Lie He Hoped You’d Ignore Governor Tony Evers recently came under fire for altering legal language in Wisconsin to remove traditional family terms like “mother” and “father” in favor of gender-neutral terminology, including the controversial replacement of “mother” with “inseminated person.” Evers has claimed that this is about ensuring legal clarity for parents using in vitro fertilization (IVF), but the truth is far different. The Legislative Process & the Lie Under Wisconsin Statute § 16.47, the governor is required to submit a biennial budget proposal to the Joint Finance Committee (JFC), which consists of 16 legislative members. This proposal is subject to amendments and must pass both legislative chambers in identical form before it becomes law. After passage, the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) finalizes language and oversees implementation. Evers, however, misrepresented his role in this process. He claimed that the decision to alter these gendered terms was a necessary legal update to accommodate IVF services. However, IVF-related protections have long been covered under existing state and federal law, including the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Wisconsin Statute § 103.10, which already grant leave and protections to individuals who give birth—regardless of how they conceive. Reading the Signs: Body Language & Deception When confronted about the changes, Evers displayed classic signs of deception: Head Down Before Answering – A defensive posture, indicating discomfort. Glancing Down and to the Right – This signals emotional justification rather than factual recall. Direct Eye Contact on Attacks – A technique used to project confidence while evading accountability. His response was not one of transparency but rather a “block and bridge” strategy—dodging the question and redirecting attention to a strawman argument about Republicans allegedly opposing IVF, which is false. The Bottom Line Evers didn’t just tweak some wording—he intentionally manipulated the law to conform to a radical ideological agenda while misleading Wisconsinites about the reasoning. The media failed to challenge him, but the facts are clear: his changes were unnecessary, his justification was false, and his deception was obvious. Wisconsin voters deserve better than a governor who plays word games with the law while gaslighting the public.

In a shocking attempt to push gender-neutral language, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers’ budget proposal sought to replace biological terms such as “mother” and “father” with “inseminated person” and “spouse.” This move sparked outrage among conservatives who see it as yet another effort to erase traditional family values. What Did Evers’ Budget Attempt to Change? Evers’ proposed changes included: Replacing mother with inseminated person Replacing father with spouse Changing husband and wife to spouse Changing stepmom and stepdad to stepparent The justification? According to Evers, it was meant to ensure “legal certainty” for individuals undergoing IVF (in vitro fertilization). However, no other state requires this kind of language shift to guarantee IVF rights, making Evers’ rationale highly questionable. Breaking Down Evers’ Weak Defense When asked about the changes, Evers immediately looked down—classic defensive body language. As Andy Parrish explains in the latest episode of I’m Right, Deal With It, looking down and to the right typically indicates an emotional argument rather than a factual one. Throughout the exchange, Evers repeatedly asserted that the change was to “help moms,” yet failed to explain how removing the word “mother” actually benefits women. Moreover, the bill also altered terms like husband and wife, which have nothing to do with maternal healthcare. Who Asked for This? One glaring issue: No major group had publicly requested these changes. The Wisconsin budget process involves submission to the Joint Finance Committee, where amendments are made before being voted on by the state legislature. So, when Evers claims “all we want”, the question remains—who exactly is we? The Bigger Picture This move is part of a broader trend by progressive politicians to erase biological realities in favor of so-called inclusivity. However, inclusivity should not come at the cost of erasing universally understood and respected terms like mother and father. If Wisconsin Democrats truly wanted to help parents, they could focus on expanding parental leave policies or improving childcare affordability—rather than engaging in ideological wordplay. Final Thoughts The bottom line? No one needed or asked for this change. It’s a blatant attempt to push an agenda that most Wisconsinites do not support. Governor Evers should be focusing on real issues facing Wisconsin families instead of attempting to redefine biological terms for political gain.

Cringe-worthy land acknowledgments are everywhere, but let’s be real—America wasn’t stolen, it was settled, fought for, and built by hardworking Americans. So why haven’t the woke crowd given their land back? Because it’s never been about justice—it’s about control. Let’s break it down.

The Real Story Behind Trump’s Tariff Strategy: Why Mexico and Canada Depend on Us When Donald Trump reintroduced tariffs on North American trade partners, critics predicted disaster: skyrocketing prices, international outrage, and economic turmoil. But reality paints a different picture — one in which tariffs are a powerful tool to protect American industry, secure borders, and assert economic leadership. Tariffs vs. Taxes: Understanding the Difference A critical distinction must be made between tariffs and taxes. Taxes burden American families and businesses, often discouraging economic growth. Tariffs, however, are targeted economic tools designed to correct trade imbalances and encourage fair trade practices. Before the implementation of NAFTA in 1994, the United States maintained a $1.6 billion trade surplus with Mexico. By 2020, this had turned into a $101 billion trade deficit, as American manufacturing jobs moved south due to cheaper labor and fewer regulations. The same trend was seen with Canada, where the U.S. now faces a $21 billion goods trade deficit despite our critical role in refining Canadian oil. Our Leverage: Exporting Necessities Mexico and Canada are far more reliant on the United States than we are on them: Mexico exports 80% of its goods to the U.S. Canada sends 75% of its exports to the U.S. What do we send them in return? The list reads like a survival kit for modern economies: Pharmaceuticals: Essential medications and medical equipment. Refined Oil: Mexico depends heavily on the U.S. for its gasoline supply. Semiconductors and Technology: Critical components for electronics and modern infrastructure. If these nations retaliated with tariffs, they would only cripple their economies, as they have limited alternatives for sourcing these necessities. Trade Alternatives: America’s Freedom to Source Elsewhere Unlike Mexico and Canada, the United States has abundant options for sourcing goods: Electronics from Taiwan and South Korea Textiles from Vietnam Automotive components from Europe Agricultural products from South America This flexibility underscores America’s strength in global trade negotiations. Economic Wars of the Future As Trump correctly identified, future conflicts won’t be fought with traditional weapons but through economic leverage and societal unrest. By using tariffs strategically, America can maintain its dominance while safeguarding jobs and industries at home. Conclusion Far from being a reckless gamble, tariffs are a calculated move to protect American interests. With Mexico and Canada heavily dependent on the U.S. market, we hold the upper hand. It’s time to use that leverage to ensure a prosperous and secure future for American workers.