DiscoverUncommon Cents with Bowman Financial Strategies
Claim Ownership
Uncommon Cents with Bowman Financial Strategies
Author: Erik Bowman
Subscribed: 5Played: 20Subscribe
Share
© Copyright Erik Bowman 2024
Description
Welcome to Uncommon Cents, your go-to podcast for financial education and retirement planning. Hosted by Erik Bowman of Bowman Financial Strategies in Englewood, Colorado, this series offers clear explanations, honest advice, and expert guidance to help you navigate the complexities of financial planning. Tune in for the latest commentary on investment, retirement, and insurance topics and trends. Discover the 80/20 Retirement Formula, focusing on three key areas: Clear Explanations, Honest Advice, and Expert Guidance. Our mission is to empower you to confidently manage your finances and achieve your retirement goals. Prepare for your financial future with helpful tools and actionable ideas to live a better life in retirement. Whether you're climbing the financial mountain or standing at the summit, Bowman Financial Strategies provides personalized roadmaps to simplify complex financial terms and investment options. We help retirees across the country reach their goals, ensuring you live well in retirement. Join us on Uncommon Cents for wealth management and retirement planning made simple. Subscribe now and let us help you reach the summit of financial success. Visit us online at https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ or call 303-222-8034. You can also find the video version of the podcast on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRlMIf7b7rcOxboPiwq5AGg
29 Episodes
Reverse
Are you looking for ways to make the most of your retirement savings while also supporting a cause you care about? In this episode, Erik dives into the ins and outs of Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs), a smart financial strategy that allows retirees to fulfill required minimum distributions (RMDs) while reducing taxable income. You'll learn exactly how QCDs work, who they’re best suited for, and the key tax benefits they offer. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:34 – How QCDs work 4:19 – When does it make sense to do this? Get access to all of our free guides on Social Security, RMDs, Investing, and more: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/resources#Guides Watch all of our educational videos on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3XcNgZE Book at 20 minute introductory phone call with Erik: https://calendly.com/bfs-2019/web-inquiry-phone-call-with-erik-bowman?month=2024-09 Other ways to get in touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/
If you could save tens of thousands of dollars in taxes every year, you’d have more freedom to pursue what truly matters- whether it's travel, hobbies, or leaving a financial legacy. In this episode, Erik explains how diversifying your retirement accounts by taxability can help you do just that. By building a mix of IRAs, 401(k)s, Roth IRAs, and non-qualified brokerage accounts, you gain more control over how and when your income is taxed, helping you protect your wealth from future tax hikes and legislative changes. Tune in as Erik walks you through the tax rules for each type of account, the risks of relying too heavily on pre-tax retirement savings, and how a strategic approach to withdrawals can help you minimize taxes. Whether you're just starting to plan or approaching retirement, these strategies will help you make tax-efficient decisions and preserve more of your hard-earned wealth. Don’t leave your retirement at the mercy of future tax laws- learn how to take control today! Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:16 – Pre-tax and post-tax accounts 6:06 – Strategies for tax-efficient distribution 10:49 – When to start diversifying accounts? Get access to all of our free guides on Social Security, RMDs, Investing, and more: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/resources#Guides Watch all of our educational videos on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3XcNgZE Book at 20 minute introductory phone call with Erik: https://calendly.com/bfs-2019/web-inquiry-phone-call-with-erik-bowman?month=2024-09 Other ways to get in touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/
People talk all the time about tax efficiency in retirement, but what does that truly mean and why does it matter? It’s much more than a buzzword; it’s a vital strategy for preserving more of your money in retirement. Today we’re going to explain why tax efficiency matters, the risks of not being tax efficient, and strategies for becoming tax efficient. You’ll be able to learn about different types of retirement accounts, the impact of legislative risk, and how to prepare for potential changes in tax laws. Plus, we’ll explain our Roth conversion analysis tool and how it helps us determine when you want to take advantage of a conversion to help build a tax-free retirement fund. Tax efficiency isn’t just about saving money. Being proactive about your tax planning now can help secure your financial future. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:55 – Why does this matter now? 4:24 – Tax rate changes 6:26 – Legislative risk 8:38 – Types of accounts and how they’re taxed 12:56 – HSA 14:06 – Actions you can take now 16:58 – Roth conversion analysis Get access to all of our free guides on Social Security, RMDs, Investing, and more: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/resources#Guides Watch all of our educational videos on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3XcNgZE Book at 20 minute introductory phone call with Erik: https://calendly.com/bfs-2019/web-inquiry-phone-call-with-erik-bowman?month=2024-09 Other ways to get in touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/
Are you nearing retirement or thinking about changing jobs? One of the most common questions people face is what to do with their 401(k). Should you keep it where it is, or roll it over into an IRA? In this video, we’re going to discuss the reasons you might want to rollover your old 401k today. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:58 – Scenarios that allow you to roll over old 401Ks 3:42 – Benefits of a rollover IRA 6:42 – Tax considerations in rollovers 9:35 – Consolidation & fees 12:13 – Common concerns 14:04 – Reason you’d keep the old 401k Get access to all of our free guides on Social Security, RMDs, Investing, and more: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/resources#Guides Watch all of our educational videos on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3XcNgZE Book at 20 minute introductory phone call with Erik: https://calendly.com/bfs-2019/web-inquiry-phone-call-with-erik-bowman?month=2024-09 Other ways to get in touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/
One of the most common questions we get is about Social Security and whether it’s going to run out. If you only read headlines, it seems to be a valid concern. But what’s the reality of the situation and how does it impact you when it’s time to file for Social Security? Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:43 – 2024 Trustees Report 2:40 – What goes into the projection? 4:30 – What happens if it runs out? 6:10 – Making Social Security more viable 10:15 – When will change happen? 12:34 – Retirement planning 14:47 – Filing strategies Get in Touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Book an appointment with us: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/contact Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Watch the Podcast on YouTube: Bowman Financial Strategies - YouTube
Recent rule changes have made it more crucial than ever to understand the tax implications and distribution timelines associated with inherited IRAs. Listen in as Erik and Ben break down the latest IRS rule changes affecting inherited IRAs, including the newly condensed 10-year distribution timeline. They explore the implications of these rules for both spousal and non-spousal beneficiaries and share some strategies to help navigate these changes effectively. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:09 – How the rules for inherited IRAs have changed 4:08 – What are the new rules for non-spousal IRAs? 7:01 – What about spousal IRAs? 8:54 – Tax strategies for inherited IRAs 13:56 – Working with a qualified professional Get in Touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Book an appointment with us: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/contact Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Watch the Podcast on YouTube: Bowman Financial Strategies - YouTube
Very often, we see people who know that the financial decisions that they’re making aren’t the best decisions, but they try to create excuses or explanations for why they’re doing what they’re doing. Let’s talk about why these excuses usually don’t hold water. Whether it’s procrastination, fear of market crashes, or misunderstanding Social Security, these common excuses can have long-term impacts on your financial health. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 1:49 – Social Security at 62 5:34 – Taking too much risk 7:57 – Having too much in cash 10:17 – Financial planning disinterest 12:38 – Staying with the wrong broker or advisor Get in Touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Book an appointment with us: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/contact Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Watch the Podcast on YouTube: Bowman Financial Strategies - YouTube
Retirement planning doesn’t have to be overwhelmingly complicated. It certainly doesn’t have to be as complicated as some people make it. So, in today’s episode, we’ll talk about the beauty of straightforward financial planning. Here’s what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 0:46 – The 80/20 retirement formula 2:26 – How financial planning gets overcomplicated 4:10 – Does technology help or hurt? 5:57 – Accumulate, protect, and avoid 8:19 – Saving as much as you can 10:13 – Social Security education, minimizing taxes, and protecting assets Get in Touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Book an appointment with us: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/contact Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Watch the Podcast on YouTube: Bowman Financial Strategies - YouTube
Welcome back to Uncommon Cents, where Eric Bowman of Bowman Financial Strategies brings clarity to the world of financial planning. We're back with a revamped version of the show on YouTube and all your favorite podcast streaming platforms. We have a lot of exciting content coming your way- but first, let’s get to know your host! Here’s some of what we discuss in this episode: 0:00 – Intro 0:52 – How he got into financial planning 3:31 – What he likes most about the business 4:17 – What our financial planning looks like 5:39 – An event that changed his life 7:39 – What we like most about Colorado 9:04 – What we hope you get out of this show 10:38 – Ideal viewer Get in Touch: Phone: (303) 222-8034 Book an appointment with us: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/contact Our website: https://www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bowmanfinancialstrategies/ Watch the Podcast on YouTube: Bowman Financial Strategies - YouTube
This episode of Uncommon Cents focuses on Required Minimum Distributions, or RMDs.
Uncommon Cents Podcast
Erik (00:06): You're listening to uncommon sense, a podcast by Bowman Financial Strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone. This is Erik Bowman, your host and it's January 22nd, 2020. Erik (00:27): One of the highest priorities we have is providing our clients accurate information to allow them to make informed decisions relating to their retirement income. Taxation is probably the biggest expense retirees will face in retirement and bringing actionable information to make confident decisions is a core philosophy of the Bowman Financial Strategies LiveWell Formula. The LiveWell Formula is our process of analyzing our client's current situation, managing their financial investments, coordinating their distributions from various accounts with the goal to minimize taxes and increase net income. It also includes detailed social security, filing, timing and pension planning. Recommendations for some estate planning and legacy planning are a part of the plan. In this episode, I am going to cover some of the highlights of the Secure Act approved by the Senate on December 19th, 2019. The Secure Act addresses many issues relating to retirement savings and distribution. Like everything in this world though there is some good news and some bad news in this new legislation. My goal is to provide you an education of the main components of the law and understand how it may impact you personally and additionally, we want to address how this new law may require changes to our retirement plan to both take advantage of the new provisions and to minimize the pain associated with others. Erik (01:57): The setting every community up for retirement enhancement act of 2019, better known as the Secure Act, which originally passed the house in May of 2019, was approved by the Senate on December 19th, 2019 and signed into law by the president on December 20th of 2019. The bill includes significant provisions aimed at increasing access to tax advantaged accounts and preventing older Americans from outliving their assets. There are a few key provisions regarding required minimum distributions and inherited IRAs that should be considered. Erik (02:39): In addition to the inherited IRA and required minimum distribution provisions, there are other aspects of the Secure Act. First, IRA contributions can now be made after the age of 70 and a half as long as you're still working. Employees can contribute to their own or their spouse's IRA after they've reached the age of 70 and a half. Long term part time workers are now able to join their company's 401k plan. Employees that work over a thousand hours in one year or over 500 hours in three consecutive years are now able to participate in their employer's 401k. Small business employers, of a hundred employees or less, will receive a maximum tax credit of $5,000. That's $250 per non highly compensated employee. When they establish a retirement plan, account owners are able to withdraw up to $5,000 penalty free from their retirement plan upon the birth or adoption of a child. This will be free from the 10% early withdrawal penalty, but will still be subject to ordinary income tax. Further, 529 Plans can be used to pay down student loan debt and small business owners can now more easily establish Multiple Employer Plans, or MEPs, by allowing unrelated employers to join together in the creation of a plan. The employers no longer have to be related by common ownership or by being in the same industry among other options. Erik (04:05): But for today we're going to really focus in on the required minimum distribution aspect and then our next podcast we are going to focus in on the inherited IRA changes. Today I'm going to focus on the required minimum distribution changes. They are pretty exciting and I think that most retirees would look at this as a benefit. I am going to talk about the pros and cons of this change, however. So the age for required minimum distributions has increased the age at which a retirement plan participant needs to take required minimum distributions has been pushed back from 70 and a half to age 72. What that means is in the previous setup, when you reach 70 and a half, you had to begin taking required minimum distributions by April of the following year based on a calculation by the federal government. Now they've pushed off the required minimum distributions until age 72, allowing a retiree to allow their IRA to continue to grow tax deferred until age 72. Individuals who are tr who turned 70 and a half on 1-1-2020 or later will not have to begin taking RMDs until April of the year following the year in which they turned 72. Individuals who have turned 70 and a half prior to the end of 2019 are not affected and must take out RMDs based on that 70 and a half mile stone. Erik (05:37): So let's dig into this a little bit. First, the old 70 and a half methodology was simply confusing. Why use a midyear data point to increase the odds of someone making a mistake and having to pay a 50% penalty to the government? Sounds a little bit like one of those questions that already has the answer pretty well known so I'll let you mull that over on your own. Don't forget that that penalty for noncompliance, again with the required minimum distributions, is 50% on the amount you were supposed to take out payable to the treasury. Now that the RMD start date is age 72 the first question is why? The second is how can we leverage this to the advantage of our clients? The primary published reason for increasing the RMD age is because people live longer. By previously forcing distributions and taxation at 70 and a half, the government was potentially forcing distributions from a person that might not necessarily need them and therefore forcing them to incur a tax bill that they otherwise would not create and potentially forcing them to liquidate their IRA earlier than hoped during the course of retirement. For more information on the general RMD provisions and how they functioned, by the way, I do have a dedicated podcast to all things RMDs that I did earlier in 2019 you might want to check that out. Erik (07:04): The benefit of the later age requirement of age 72, is that a client may continue to defer taxes in their IRA until age 72 which would result in a larger tax deferred account balance at age 72. And this sounds good at first glance. However, to get good use out of that, you would have to consider not taking distributions from your IRA until age 72. That can be a pretty big challenge for people who aren't generating income through wages and who may only have a social security income coming in. This could force you to actually take social security earlier than hoped for if you decided you wanted to bridge that gap and delay until age 72. For our clients, we're going to be running revised 30 year projections considering expenses, various social security filing strategies, and various IRA distribution strategies along with Roth conversions to determine the optimal combination of tactics to provide efficient net income after taxes. Erik (08:07): To clarify the new age 72 rule. Here are two examples to highlight the basic provisions. Example one John's birthday is April 20th and he turned 70 and a half in 2020. Will he need to take RMDs in 2020? The answer is no because John turned 70 and a half after the start of 2020 so he will not need to take RMDs until April of the year after he turned 72. John will turn 72 on April 20th, 2021. He will need to begin taking his first RMDs by April of 2022. Example two Sue's birthday is June 20th, and she turned 70 and a half in 2019. Will she need to take RMDs in 2020? The answer is yes because Sue turned 70 and a half before the end of 2019 she will need to take her first RMD by April of 2020, the year after the one in which she turned 70 and a half. Erik (09:16): Suffice to say, most people would say this is a win for retirees and I agree on many levels. However, it may not be as powerful for those that need to already take IRA distributions to meet the expense needs from mid sixties to age 72. In addition, not to be cynical, but let's walk through this from the government's perspective. First, by allowing you to delay until age 72, theory goes, your account balance should be larger. That means the formula used to calculate your RMDs at age 72 will result in a larger distribution than you would have taken at age 70 and a half so this can lead to a scenario. Will you be unknowingly pushed into a higher tax bracket than you otherwise would have been if you had taken strategic action in the decade leading up to age 72. The government actually likes this because they will get larger tax proceeds starting in 2021 and potentially larger account balances and IRAs may be passed on to children, or what we call non spousal beneficiaries. And the issue here is that with the new inherited IRA changes in the secure act, it can result in tremendous taxation at very high tax brackets for your non spouse beneficiaries. Erik (10:33): Usually a child. More on that. The inherited IRA changes in my next podcast. Erik (10:43): However, one strategy that may become more advantageous because of this and other secure act provisions is the Roth conversion opportunity. Roth IRAs are not subject to required minimum distributions and are tax free at distribution. The taxes are paid at contribution or the year of conversion. This strategy can lower your taxable IRA balance, therefore allowing you to control your tax bracket more efficiently and effectively in retirement. Make sure you evaluate the pros and cons of the strategy with your current advisor and make sure it fits into your long-term tax strategy. Certainly everyone should at least explore this option. If you're not a client and you want to hear more about Roth conversions and other tax mitigation strategies for those approaching or in retirement, how it may impact your plan, pl
Erik: (00:06) You're listening to uncommon sense, a podcast by Bowman Financial Strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman, and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone and thank you for joining me today. This is Erik Bowman, owner of Bowman Financial Strategies. Our topic today is required minimum distributions or more commonly known as RMDs. Erik: (00:32) To some of you, it may come as a shock that you cannot keep your retirement funds in your retirement account indefinitely. Generally speaking, you really must start taking withdrawals from your IRA, your simple IRA or your SEP IRA or even your qualified retirement plans such as a 401k or 403B when you reach 70 and a half. Roth IRAs by contrast do not require withdrawals until after the death of the owner. Your required minimum distribution or RMD is the minimum amount of taxable distribution that you must take out of your retirement account each year. Once you reach 70 and a half. Erik: (01:16) The RMD poses all sorts of conundrums for retirees, like how is it calculated? Who calculates it, when is it due? What happens if I don't take it and what if I don't want to take it? And the list goes on. Today I'm going to cover the basics of an RMD. Who does it apply to? Calculations and resources to further educate yourself and of course some potential strategies that may alleviate some of the challenges surrounding RMDs, namely taxes. Erik: (01:52) So let's start from the beginning. When you turn 70 and a half, you are required to take an RMD from your retirement account, an IRA, for example, by April 1st of the following year. For all subsequent years, you must take the distribution by December 31st of that year. For example, if you turn 70 and a half in August of 2020 you must make your distribution by April 1st of 2021. If you choose to do that, you would also have to calculate your 2021 RMD and also take that in 2021. So in actuality, in the first year that you decided to take that RMD, you would actually have to take two distributions. Now you don't have to delay until April 1st you can take your RMD in the year that you turn 70 and a half. Erik: (02:49) An exception to this rule applies to 401ks, also known as a qualified retirement plan, which is the terminology that's used to describe an employer sponsored 401k, 403B, 401A, just to name a few. For these accounts, you must take an RMD by April 1st of the year following the year you turn 70 and a half or upon retirement, whichever is later. If you're still gainfully employed for example, and you have an act of 401k and you're 72 years old, you don't have to take an RMD from that qualified plan that you have at that current employer, even though you're older than 70 and a half. However, once you retire, those RMDs are due by April 1st following the year that you retire. And one really big caveat and a mistake that you do not want to make that is even if you are working and you're older than 70 and a half, if you have an IRA in addition to your 401k, you still must take your required minimum distribution from that IRA. Don't make that mistake and I'm going to be talking about the penalties the IRS can impose if you fail to take your RMDs. Erik: (04:07) here are a few other points that may save you some headaches and money in the future. If you have multiple qualified plans or multiple 401k's, meaning maybe you've worked at previous employers and you have simply left your money behind at those various employers 401ks and you have not moved them into IRAs, you must calculate the RMD for each account individually and then take the distribution from each of those respective 401ks by the deadlines. By contrast though, if you have an IRA or multiple IRAs, you can calculate the required minimum distribution for each IRA individually. Add those together and take the total sum of those as a distribution from one of your IRAs. Now, depending on how you're investing your assets, this may be a beneficial thing to do. It certainly seems a little bit simpler than making a distribution from multiple IRAs. Since 403B's are considered qualified plans, you might think that the same rule applies. Erik: (05:09) However, it is a little bit different. If you have more than one 403B tax, sheltered annuity account, also known as a TSA, you can total the RMDs from each of those 403Bs and then take them from any one or more of the tax sheltered annuities. So I mentioned penalties a little bit earlier. So let's gather round and chat about this one. Most people are aware that if you take money out of an IRA before 59 and a half, that you will pay a 10% penalty on that distribution in addition to the taxes. And that's not fun and should be avoided in most cases. By comparison, if you fail to take your RMD on time, you will pay a whopping 50% penalty to the IRS. Yes, that's a 5- 0% penalty. So if you were supposed to take $10,000 out and you failed to do that, by the respect of deadline, you would literally owe a $5,000 penalty to the IRS in addition to income tax on the total amount. The IRS wants their taxes and they will get them one way or another. So don't let this rule catch you by surprise. Erik: (06:27) So let's talk a little bit about the actual distributions themselves. You actually do have a couple of options. First, if you've calculated your RMD for the current year, you can actually opt to take the full calculated amount in one lump sum anytime up until December 31st of that year. The one exception, of course, is your first year of required minimum distributions. You do have until April 1st of the following year, but that is only for year one. Another option is you may also choose to take periodic distributions over the course of the year to meet your obligation. You also want to take into account income, cash flow and expenses to help guide you here. But there could be strategic and tactical reasons why you might want to spread that out on a monthly or quarterly basis over the course of that year as opposed to making one large lump sum distribution. It's a little synonymous with the concept of dollar cost averaging when you're buying into stocks and bonds and other investments that you get a better average share price potentially by buying in over time. Same on the way out when you're making distributions from your IRA. It could be beneficial to take smaller amounts out over a 12 month period and in that case in, if there was a declining market, you may have actually saved yourself some principle over time. Erik: (07:56) Okay, now onto calculations. How do we determine how much you must withdraw each year? No surprise here. It's not the same every year. It's kind of complex and it totally depends on your unique situation. The IRS publishes a table called the uniform lifetime table. It's table three on the IRA RMD distribution worksheet that's available on our website on this podcast page. For example, your first IRA distribution for the year you turn 70 and a half, requires you to know your exact balance of your IRA or IRAs on December 31st of the prior year. You then take this balance and divided by 27.4. Seems like an odd number but it's a joint life expectancy number. So by dividing that balance by 27.4 the answer to that equation is the exact amount you must make as required minimum distribution. You need to do this for every single retirement account you have unless one of the exceptions I mentioned or other exceptions that your financial professional mentions may apply to you. Erik: (09:06) In the next year, when you turn 71, you will take the prior year's 1231 balance and divided by 26.5 and by the time you reach 114 yes, the table actually goes out to 115 and older, you will divide by 2.1. So 2.1 is the divisor for one 14 it drops down to 1.9 when you reach one 15 and stays there if you happen to live longer than that. But what you'll notice is that each year that goes by, the lower number in this equation gets smaller and smaller, which means the amount of money you have to distribute from your account becomes a larger portion of that account every single year. Erik: (09:53) another exception that we see periodically, it's not an everyday occurrence, but it could be your situation. So this is an exception to the rules on that table and that is if your spouse is the sole beneficiary of your IRA and he or she is more than 10 years younger than you in this case, the IRA utilizes another table for you to calculate your distribution. The IRS wants more money from you while you are alive so that when your IRA is left to your younger spouse, who by the way can usually take RMDs based on their age and spread that out over a longer period of time. Well, there's going to be less money in that account to spread over a supposedly longer lifespan of your younger spouse. It's just another way of the government saying, we would like to ensure that we get these tax dollars sooner than later, but don't forget that it is a totally different calculation with a different bottom number on that fraction when you're calculating your RMDs, if your spouse is more than 10 years younger than you. Now there are many, many other rules regarding RMDs. If you're a 5% owner of a company for example, and you're still working in that company and you have a 401k, you're not allowed to continue to delay RMDs, passed 70 and a half. You actually still have to take them per the original rules, but just know that you really should be talking with your financial professional before you solidify any of your RMD calculations or distribution strategy. Erik: (11:30) So relating to strategies, the name of our company after all is Bowman Financial Strategies and we really try to look for opportunities to save our clients money, save them on taxes and just to be efficient when it comes to the distribution of their assets during the retirement stage of their life. So relating to strategies, one of the challenges to a moderately high net wort
Erik: 00:06 You're listening to uncommon sense, a podcast by Bowman financial strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman, and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone. My name is Erik Bowman and I am the owner and founder of Bowman financial strategies. Thanks for taking the time to listen to this podcast. Today, I'm going to be discussing the three primary risks in retirement. Erik: 00:34 At Bowman Financial Strategies, we work every day helping clients who are transitioning from accumulation to distribution to do so wisely and confidently. I've seen the success stories, worked with many challenges facing retirees and helped my clients craft income plans they are confident will meet their needs for the entirety of retirement. Importantly, these plans are built to provide stability and to support your standard of living regardless of market conditions. Getting motivated to take the necessary steps to create an effective retirement plan can be challenging. However, not crafting an effective plan can be catastrophic to your retirement. It's often been said that your retirement outcome is a result of your retirement income and never truer words have been said. You have worked hard, saved during your careers and budgeted wisely, knowing that the day was going to come when you will need to replace your income without working. Now you have an accumulated bucket of money to retire with and the primary goal many times is to maintain your current standard of living you enjoy now plus add in more travel. Erik: 01:43 Well one method is to invest in the stock market, hope you're diversified and allocated correctly, and hope to get enough of a return, and hope that the market doesn't crash and take your retirement with it. At Bowman Financial Strategies, we don't ever use the word hope in our retirement plans. Our plans are designed to remove anxiety knowing that all three risks in retirement are addressed appropriately. The Bowman Financial Strategies income planning process known as the LiveWell formula focuses on three primary risks in retirement, and every recommendation in our plans directly addresses these primary risks. The risks in order are sequence of return risk, inflation risk, and longevity risk. To further break these down, let's look at them one at a time. Erik: 02:37 The first risk: sequence of return risk. I also call this early retirement market timing risk. This risk is represented by the risk of significant negative market returns in the early years of retirement. You only have to go back to 2007 through 2009 to witness over a 50% drop in the U.S. Stock market. It's been over 10 years since that low and the markets have marched steadily upwards since then with very few exceptions. And with markets routinely setting new highs, some would say that the potential for continued growth for the next 10 years is less likely than a significant drop during that same period. If you are just starting retirement and you're fully exposed to potential market losses like 2009, and many seniors were and are, your future retirement plans may change dramatically requiring an unpleasant adjustment in your standard of living to make ends meet. We seek ways to limit early retirement market timing risk by using fixed or guaranteed rate of return solutions to reduce the exposure to pure stock market. Erik: 03:50 The second primary risk is: inflation risk. And this is really the opposite of the market timing or sequence of return risk because inflation risk is the risk that your assets and income may not get enough of a return and be able to keep up with the ever rising costs of goods and services. If your income never increases or your assets never increase the rate of return, but the cost of a gallon of milk doubles in 10 years, your effective purchasing power has just dropped significantly. Accounting for inflation is critical to a good income plan. By failing to plan for inflation, you may misjudge the amount of money you can spend each year in retirement, finding yourself running out of money a decade sooner than you planned. This leads once again to a catastrophic change in your standard of living if you run out of supplemental income sources like IRAs, in addition to social security and pensions midway in retirement. We typically address inflation risk by having professionally managed stock and bond portfolios for our clients that are appropriately allocated for their timeline and risk tolerance. Erik: 05:00 The third primary risk is: longevity risk. This risk can be further divided into two types of risk, longevity risk associated with income and longevity risk associated with health care expenses. Income risk is the risk of running out of income sufficient to cover your essential expenses in retirement. Having enough guaranteed income to meet your essential needs or a floor of income provides not only a financial advantage but also a psychological one. Your confidence and baseline income allows you to live anxiety free and stick with the long term plans related to your invest-able assets that may be in the stock market that are dedicated to long term inflation protection. The other longevity risk is healthcare risk, which is the risk that you may experience deteriorating health that require the assistance of qualified professionals to help you with the six basic activities of daily living also known as A.D.L.s. Contrary to what many believe, health insurance and Medicare do not pay for long term care expenses. Erik: 06:05 If you don't have a strategy in place, you are considered "self-insured", quote unquote. This means that if you experience a health condition requiring assistance with the six activities of daily living, you will need to spend down your assets until you have $2,000 (at least that's the requirement in most states to be eligible for Medicaid as well as some income thresholds that if you exceed would make you non eligible). But if you even are eligible for Medicaid at some point, then your state Medicaid program may help. And as former president, Ronald Reagan said, "don't worry, I'm with the government and I'm here to help." So most people don't look at Medicaid as the primary route to take care of their health care expenses later on in life if they have the resources to help plan against that risk. Erik: 06:54 Now that we understand the three basic risks, that being: sequence of return risk, (you don't want to lose a lot of money early in retirement), inflation risk, (we still need to seek growth with our retirement assets because things will get more expensive and over a long 30 year lifespan in retirement or more, things can get significantly more expensive.) And then finally, longevity risk. And that would be the risk associated with assuming that you can figure out how to have guaranteed income streams that will last as long as you live, no matter how long that is, and then the long-term care expenses that are also commonly associated with longevity. Once we gather all of your required information, we then begin using sophisticated financial software to calculate the maximum annual income using agreed upon assumptions and always addressing those three financial risks in retirement. Thanks a lot for joining me today. I truly appreciate your time. If you ever have any ideas of topics that you would like to have me discuss here, please drop us a line. You can send me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com that's E R I K @bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or you can simply give us a call at (303) 222-8034. And finally you could go to our Facebook page and you can drop us a note there as well. Thanks again for joining me today. I hope you enjoy the rest of your week. Erik: 08:20 Thank you for joining me for Uncommon Sense. The Bowman Financial Strategies financial education series. I'd love to hear your feedback on financial topics you would like to learn more about. Just drop me an email at Erik, that's E R I K @bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or go to the Bowman Financial Strategies website and send me a note on our contact page. In addition, you can always search for topics of interest in my archive on our podcast page at www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/podcasts. Have a great day. Disclosure: 08:56 This communication does not constitute federal tax advice and may not be used as such. Please consult a qualified tax professional for tax advice or assistance. In addition, investment advisory services offered by Change Path, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Change Path and Bowman financial strategies are unaffiliated entities.
Erik: 00:00 You're listening to Uncommon Cents, a podcast by Bowman Financial Strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone. Today we're going to be discussing common beneficiary mistakes and how to prevent them. It is June 20th, 2019. Thanks for joining me today. Erik: 00:32 Before I get into the common beneficiary mistakes, I thought I might take a moment to briefly give you an overview of some of the principles that we adhere to at Bowman financial strategies when it comes to beneficiary designations. The first thing is that we always want to name at least a primary beneficiary and whenever possible or when it makes sense. We also want to name a contingent beneficiary. The rationale for this really revolves around ensuring that your assets are going to whom you want them to go to after you've passed away without interference from the probate courts in the government and potentially contested wills and things like that where what you want to have happen may not actually work out smoothly if you don't designate it in the original contract or by making an additional beneficiary designation after a contract has already been opened up. This would apply to investment accounts, qualified and non-qualified example of a qualified account would be an IRA or an individual retirement account. And then there's non-qualified taxable brokerage accounts. Then of course, life insurance policies. All of these, you want to make sure that you have appropriate beneficiary designations. Erik: 01:51 So the first primary issue is not naming a beneficiary on a life insurance policy or an investment account. Most of our custodians, fidelity and Schwab, for example, when we open up an IRA or a Roth IRA, they actually mandate that you list a primary beneficiary at a minimum before they'll even open the account. However, for non-qualified accounts, also known as transfer on death accounts, they actually do not require a beneficiary to be named if there is no beneficiary, the investment company or the custodian typically has their method of how they're going to dispose of those funds upon the death of the account owner. And usually it means it's going to go to the estate and then you're going to have the state get involved through probate with probate courts and lawyers cost, time and aggravation. So if you want to ensure that your assets flow through to who you want them to flow to after you're gone, you want to ensure that you are listing at least a primary beneficiary on all of your accounts. Erik: 02:57 As an extension of this, first of not naming a beneficiary, as we've just discussed, you should always name it primary, but it's also problematic if you don't name a contingent beneficiary, a contingent beneficiary as the person who's going to receive the assets. If the account owner dies and if the primary beneficiary is also no longer alive, then the cash or the assets will flow directly to that contingent beneficiary. Once again, if a husband and wife die in an auto accident to be morbid for a quick moment and the surviving or the spouse, the wife was listed as the beneficiary and they both died in that car accident and if there's no contingent beneficiary, then once again those assets are going to be subject to probate. Erik: 03:47 Another issue can run into sometimes, is that with an individual retirement account, what we find is that some people want to name a trust as the beneficiary. The issue with this is that upon the death of the account owner, the assets are going to then be liquidated and pass on to the trust, which is going to create some tax implications that are not usually very beneficial. That doesn't mean however, that every time you want to have a trust as a beneficiary for an IRA that it's wrong. There could be an example where we have a single parent and the children are minors and they don't want to leave $500,000 to a two year old. So you would accept that there are tax consequences and have the beneficiary be the trust. But at least the trust then and through the trustee is going to be able to exercise control over the distribution of those assets. Erik: 04:40 But in most situations you would want to list your spouse as the beneficiary, which offers the definitive benefit of the IRA simply becomes the account of the surviving spouse. It's in their name, it doesn't have any reference to the deceased. And that means all tax deferral applies to the surviving spouse and their age. So for example, if the deceased spouse was older than the surviving spouse, this would delay the required minimum distribution rule so that they don't have to start taking money out of this IRA until they're age 70 and a half as opposed to, I'm taking it out based on the age of the deceased. Erik: 05:27 A third issue with beneficiary designations would be not taking into account special circumstances. Not all loved ones should receive assets directly. These individuals might include minors or individuals with special needs. Individuals with special needs, for example, may be receiving benefits from the state to the State Medicaid program. And if you were to leave them money directly through a beneficiary designation, those assets then would fall into their ownership and therefore into their estate and would be counted against them, if you will, that might prevent them from receiving future valuable government benefits. So you want to evaluate that with an estate planning attorney and determine if potentially a special needs trust or some type of trust might make sense in that case to prevent that person from losing valuable government benefits. Erik: 06:25 The fourth issue that we often see is not updating beneficiaries over time. Who you want to or should name as a beneficiary will most likely change over time as circumstances change and naming a beneficiary is part of an overall estate plan just as life changes. So should your estate plan. Beneficiary designations are an important part of that overall plan, so you want to make sure that they're updated regularly. Erik: 06:54 A final error that people can make when naming a beneficiary is to name the wrong beneficiary. Now this may be unintentional because sometimes the beneficiary section of an application may not ask for a lot of information. It may only ask for a name and if you have multiple people in a family with similar names such as senior junior or the second or third, but the beneficiary designation form doesn't allow you to be that specific. Well that can cause potential litigation down the road and confusion. So you want to make sure you have the ability potentially through a letter of instruction in addition to the actual application to get very specific about exactly who that person is. Now many times on the application they actually have a place for the social security number and date of birth of the beneficiary. By adding these two pieces of information, you can be assured that the correct person is going to be receiving the benefits should the owner pass away. Erik: 07:52 So in review, the primary mistakes we see regarding beneficiaries are number one, not naming a beneficiary. Number two would be not taking into account special circumstances when naming a beneficiary. Number three, not updating your beneficiary designations over time. And number four, naming beneficiaries incorrectly, which could lead to some confusion on who actually gets the money. And one of the subcategories that I also discussed was the downside of potentially naming a trust as the beneficiary. You want to make sure you're doing that with full knowledge of why you're doing it and the implications. As always, if you have any questions about beneficiary designations, please feel free to reach out to me, Erik Bowman at Bowman Financial Strategies. You can give a call to our office at (303) 222-8034 or you can send me an email at Erik that's E R I K at Bowman Financial Strategies.com. I appreciate you listening to this podcast today. Please feel free to share it with your friends and I look forward to speaking with you all again soon. Thank you for joining me for Uncommon Cents, the Bowman Financial Strategies financial education series. I'd love to hear your feedback on financial topics. You would like to learn more about. Just drop me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or go to the Bowman Financial Strategies website and send me a note on our contact page. In addition, you can always search for topics of interest in my archive on our podcast page at www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com/podcasts have a great day. Disclosure: 09:39 This communication does not constitute federal tax advice and may not be used as such. Please consult a qualified tax professional for tax advice or assistance. In addition, investment advisory services offered by Change Path, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Change Path and Bowman Financial Strategies are unaffiliated entities.
Erik: 00:00 You're listening to Uncommon Cents, a podcast by Bowman Financial Strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone. This is Erik Bowman, your host for Uncommon Cents and today we're going to be talking about the Colorado retirement income tax exemptions. Before I get into the details of these specific exemptions that can help lower your Colorado state taxes, it is important to note that before you make any assumptions or attempt to take any of these exemptions, I highly recommend that you get with an accountant to understand how these are going to actually impact your taxes and to ensure that you're following current state law. The primary topics we're going to cover today are what is the exemption and what type of income qualifies for the exemption, who does it apply to, and what are some of the planning opportunities that may make sense for you if you're in retirement and currently taking some type of retirement income? Erik: 01:07 First, if you meet certain qualifications, you may be able to deduct or subtract some or all of your qualified retirement income on your Colorado individual income tax return. For these purposes, Colorado determines retirement income and defines it as annuity or pension income, IRA distributions, portions of your social security income as well as Roth conversions. All of these potentially apply for this exemption. In addition, if you derive retirement income from the Colorado public employee retirement association, commonly known as Colorado Para, or if you receive a pension from the Denver public school retirement system, you may be able to claim those as well. So first things first, who can actually claim this exemption? Well, you may be able to claim the exemption if you received qualifying retirement income and you meet the following criteria. First, you have to have been at least 55 years old or older at the end of the tax year that you're wishing to claim the exemption. Erik: 02:17 Or, you should have received the qualifying pension or annuity income as a beneficiary because of the death of a person who earned the pension or annuity. One of those two are the minimum requirements. Let's talk a little bit more about the type of income that is potentially exempt. As I mentioned, annuity income can be exempt. A Colorado Pera pension may be exempt as well, and so our distributions from your traditional Ira and what we're talking about here are the taxable distributions from a traditional Ira, not the distributions from a Roth Ira or a non-qualified account. In addition, portions, social security income may be exempt. We do need to remember though that all of your social security income is not necessarily taxable at the federal level, and in order to qualify for the state exemption, the social security income must be taxable at the federal level, so that's going to require a little bit of accounting help to make sure that you're accurate in that respect. Roth conversion income is exempt as a part of this rule as well. That's very important because as a financial strategy, Roth conversions may be a very valuable tool to save income taxes over the life time of retirement. Erik: 03:41 The second topic I'd like to discuss is how much is potentially exempt? Well, if you're at least 55 years old but less than 65 years old at the individual level, you may be able to have a maximum allowable subtraction or deduction of $20,000 once you are at least 65 years old, that maximum allowable exemption increases to $24,000. That means that for a married couple filing jointly, you actually have a total potential household state exemption of 24,000 each, which is 48,000 total at the household level. If you're both over 65 years old, however, you can't share that exemption, meaning if one person took $48,000 of income from a traditional IRA and the other spouse did not take any retirement income, the spouse that took the $48,000 traditional IRA distribution is capped at the $24,000 maximum allowable subtraction. There are certain exemptions for tax-payers that are under 55 years old where you may have a maximum allowable subtraction of up to $20,000 for example. Erik: 04:59 You may be able to claim the subtraction for pension or annuity income received due to the death of a person who earned the income even if you're younger than 55 next, I'd like to touch on some of the planning strategies that you may be able to consider as part of your overall income and tax planning as a retiree. So let's take an example. This may be the easiest way to explain it. Let's assume that we have a married couple. Both are age 63, at age 63 if you recall, you have up to a $20,000 exemption because they're not 65 yet, and let's assume they both have traditional IRAs of $500,000 each. Just as a reminder, a traditional IRAs is an IRA where you made contributions pretax, you did not pay income tax on the year of contribution. Those dollars grew tax deferred and now upon distribution in the tax year of distribution, you're going to pay income tax on those distributions. Erik: 06:03 Well under that scenario, each of the spouses is eligible for a $20,000 state exemption because they are older than 55 but younger than 65 one of the planning strategies would be to consider how much money you're going to actually take at the household level in distributions to meet your expense needs and then potentially split those distributions between the two traditional IRAs, the husband and wife, so that you can maximize the household deduction. As a more specific example, if they needed to take $48,000 of distributions from traditional IRAs at the household level, you might consider splitting those distributions between the two IRAs so that each person could get a $20,000 exemption. By comparison. If, let's say we have one of the spouses take all $48,000 from their personal traditional IRA, they are only, you are only going to get a total of a $20,000 exemption in this case as opposed to the household $40,000 exemption. Erik: 07:06 If they both leverage their $20,000 individual exemption at the state level, that is a potential state tax savings of over $900 and that is because at the individual level, even though they're married, the maximum allowable potential exemption is $20,000 per person and there is no sharing of that exemption even between a husband and a wife. So once again in review, a potential planning strategy is to maximize the state exemption by looking at the distributions required to meet your income need in retirement and split those distributions between two traditional IRAs, one owned by one spouse and one by another so that each can maximize that state exemption. Erik: 07:59 Another potential strategy revolves around Roth conversions. Let's imagine the same couple husband and wife are both age 63 years old, but they don't need to make any traditional IRA distributions to meet their expense needs. What they can do, if it makes sense for their long term retirement plan, is to perform Roth conversions. This means moving the assets from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA and pay the taxes on that movement of money or distribution in the year of conversion. The Roth conversions are typically going to be taxable at the federal level as well as at the state level. However, Roth conversions do qualify for the state level exemption, so in any given year, if you actually do Roth conversions and you're over 55 you can take up to a $20,000 state exemption per person at the state level for that Roth conversion. That type of strategy and managing your marginal tax rates and exemptions can be very beneficial in the long run for your income plan and something that you should be reviewing with your adviser. Erik: 09:10 One very important consideration when looking at any of these plans is that this exemption does not count at the federal level. Federal exemptions are totally separate and calculated separately. You need to ensure that you're working with an accountant that has a full understanding of the state tax laws and also understands how specific retirement income exemptions may fit into your tax filing. If you ever have any questions about the financial situations involving Roth conversions, the state exemptions of retirement income, or just want to review your current financial situation, by all means, you can reach out to us at Bowman Financial Strategies at 303-222-8034. You can also feel free to send me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com and that's Erik, spelled E. R. I. K. We look forward to hearing from you soon and please share this with people that you know, if you think that it would be beneficial to them. If you're an existing client, you can always call my cell phone or reach out to the office to schedule or call for a face to face meeting. Thanks for joining me today to discuss the Colorado state retirement income tax exemption. Let me know if you have any topics that you would like to see discussed here at uncommon sense. We do want to provide you with information that you find helpful. Thanks again and have a great day. Erik: 10:29 Thank you for joining me for Uncommon Cents, the Bowman Financial Strategies financial education series. I'd love to hear your feedback on financial topics you would like to learn more about. Just drop me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or go to the Bowman
Erik: 00:06 You're listening to uncommon sense, a podcast by Bowman Financial Strategies. I'm your host Erik Bowman, and thank you for joining me today. Hi everyone. Erik Bowman here, the owner of Bowman financial strategies in Englewood, Colorado. I appreciate you listening today. Today's podcast is going to be discussing something that we work on every single day in our firm and that is social security maximization. We're going to discuss not only the basics of social security maximization, but what are the three biggest mistakes people tend to make when filing for social security? So to get started, social security maximization is the process of analyzing all potential filing strategies available to a household and determining which strategy offers the highest potential income. You have worked over 80,000 hours [based on a 40 hour work week times 35 years] and contributed to social security for your whole life. You deserve to receive the highest income possible. Unfortunately, the social security administration cannot and will not help you determine what filing strategy is in your best interest. Erik: 01:15 The Social Security Administration can only tell you how much your benefit would be at any filing age. They are neither licensed nor allowed to discuss filing strategies with the public. With a lifetime value of potentially over $1 million for a household. We recommend that you put the appropriate amount of effort into making this extremely important choice when to take social security. So to the question when to take social security, everybody has 96 basic social security filing choices, meaning you can take it as early as age 62 and you can delay as long as age 70 and if you count the number of months up (because you can take your social security benefit at any month in between those two ages), you have a total of 96 discrete choices and if you're married, your spouse also has 96 discrete choices, which means when you look at the combinations of filing strategies, there are over 9,216 basic filing strategies for an American couple. Erik: 02:18 In addition, if you include all of the spousal benefit choices that are available to a married couple and to divorce participants, potentially the number of filing choices exceeds over 100,000 [https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/matrix.html] and if you compare all of those potential combinations of filing strategies, you could sort them from the highest amount of income you'll receive over retirement to the lowest amount of household income you're going to receive over retirement, and that difference can be as high as $150,000 or more of lifetime retirement income. In other words, by making the wrong filing choice, you could receive $150,000 less in lifetime income than if you made a more strategic decision. Erik: 03:04 The three biggest mistakes that people make when filings for social security, in my opinion, are number one, not paying attention to potential spousal survivor benefits, and only looking at a basic break even equation for your own personal benefit. By doing this, you totally miss out and don't calculate the additional survivor benefit that would go to a surviving spouse in the event of death of a social security recipient. For example, if the higher wage earner delays taking benefits until age 70 increasing the total amount of social security they would get each year. If that person were to pass away, that higher check is going to be left behind for the survivor. On the other hand, if that higher wage earner took their social security benefit at age 62 for example, the earliest possible age to be able to take social security, the reduction is tremendous and that is going to be forever reduced in the amount that would be left behind for a surviving spouse. Most of the time it is the male that's going to pass away first and therefore leaving a lower amount of ongoing monthly benefit to a surviving spouse. Erik: 04:21 The second mistake that I often see is filing too early and having to pay back your benefits to the Social Security Administration. If you're working and make over a certain income threshold and you are taking an early benefit from social security meaning before you hit full retirement age, also known as FRA and (by the way your FRA is determined by your year of birth but it's going to land somewhere between age 66 and age 67) well if you take your social security benefit prior to FRA and you're still working in making over the income threshold that changes each year, you very well are going to be stuck paying back $1 for every $2 earned over that threshold and it is possible that you could pay back all of your social security benefits. In addition, it's a decision that is very hard if not impossible to unwind a very unwelcome situation. Erik: 05:22 The third mistake I often see is not coordinating your social security filing decision within the context of your other assets. That means taxable assets that upon distribution you will pay income tax on such as IRAs and 401k's and non qualified assets. Those that don't have any tax benefits but you don't necessarily have to pay income tax when you make distributions, you'll only have to pay capital gains tax on the growth. Well in some cases, as an example, it may make sense to delay social and utilize your IRA assets until age 70. This may not apply to you, but the longest you can delay your benefits is age 70 and by doing so and lowering your IRA account balance from your mid sixties till age 70 when it comes time to take your required minimum distributions, you very well will be forced to take less out each year than you otherwise would. Erik: 06:23 And then by turning on social security at age 70 what we see and what we need to understand is that only 85% of your social security benefits are taxed. So now at age 70 if you only have 85% or up to 85% of your social security wages being taxed and you are allowed to take smaller distributions from your IRA, you very well could find yourself paying less than federal taxes. The way I look at it is a dollar saved in taxes is an extra dollar you can spend in retirement. Now, this strategy does not necessarily work for everybody. If you need income, you very well will have to turn on your social security to start producing income if you're not working anymore. However, if you do have a sizable retirement assets such as an IRA worth over a million dollars, you would want to analyze how it would look to delay social security, increasing that benefit and potentially utilizing your IRA in the earlier years of retirement to consciously reduce that account balance. Therefore, you would be reducing your RMDs or required minimum distribution amounts starting at age 70 and a half. You should always consult with a financial adviser and an accountant to ensure that if you're going to implement a strategy such as this, that it makes financial sense Erik: 07:47 Because the value of your social security decision is so high, often worth over $1 million in lifetime income at the household level. We believe all retirement income plans should contain a thorough analysis so you make the most appropriate social security filing choice to maximize your social security income. After all, you have paid taxes into the system for decades and you deserve to maximize what you get in social security benefits. If you're an existing client, please reach out anytime. If you ever have questions or need to sit down to discuss your plan. If you're not a client and have questions, please contact our office to schedule an appointment by calling (303) 222-8034 or you can go to our website at www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com and drop us a note. I look forward to hearing from you all. Have a great day. Thank you for joining me for Uncommon Cents, the Bowman Financial Strategies financial education series. I'd love to hear your feedback on financial topics. You would like to learn more about. Just drop me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or go to the Bowman Financial Strategies website and send me a note on our contact page. In addition, you can always search for topics of interest in my archive on our podcast page at www.bowmenfinancialstrategies.com/podcasts Have a great day. Disclosure: 09:25 This communication does not constitute federal tax advice and may not be used as such. Please consult a qualified tax professional for tax advice or assistance. In addition, investment advisory services offered by Change Path LLC, a registered investment adviser, Change Path and Bowman Financial Strategies are unaffiliated entities. [Please see the Social Security website at www.ssa.gov for more information. The information for this podcast has been taken from the Social Security Handbook found at https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10035.pdf . This podcast is meant for general knowledge, not specific to your personal needs. We are not affiliated with the Social Security Administration or any other government agency.]
Erik: 00:06 You're listening to uncommon sense podcast by Bowman financial strategies. I'm your host, Erik Bowman and thank you for joining me today. Erik: 00:17 Hello everyone. Erik Bowman here, owner of Bowman Financial Strategies. I hope you are having a fantastic day. It is April 3rd, 2019. You may have noticed some new letters next to my name. I've recently been awarded the designation of RICP, which stands for retirement income certified professional. Erik: 00:43 An RICP designee is trained to understand how to structure effective retirement income plans, how to mitigate risks to the plan, and how to create a sustainable income stream to last throughout a client's retirement years. To achieve this designation, I've taken three college level courses with a study time of around 150 hours. These courses include topics such as; sources of retirement income, managing the retirement plan, and strategies specific to the retirement processes. I picked this designation because it has the broadest course of study throughout and it is focused specifically on the needs of the clients that I serve almost exclusively, and that is people transitioning from accumulation to distribution. Erik: 01:55 In addition to completing these courses, I will also have 30 hours of continuing education every two years to keep this current. This allows me to stay on top of any changes in the regulatory environment that may impact my clients. I feel that this designation is a tremendous benefit to my clientele, because it really helps solidify my knowledge of the tools to help you live well in your retirement years. By having this designation, I'm better able to answer your income questions, but also making sure the plan that we make together is effective, meets your goals, is tax efficient, and can withstand an unknown future, a future that has risks and opportunities. By mitigating the risks and positioning assets to leverage opportunities for growth, our desire is that you experienced the retirement you have always dreamed of. If you're an existing client, please reach out anytime if you ever have a question or need to sit down to discuss your plan. And if you're not a client and have questions, please contact our office to schedule an appointment by calling (303) 222-8034 or you can go to our website at www.bowmanfinancialstrategies.com and send us a note. I appreciate your time today. Thanks for listening and I hope you have a fantastic day. Erik: 02:53 Thank you for joining me for uncommon sense, the Bowman financial strategies, financial education. I'd love to hear your feedback on financial topics you would like to learn more about. Just drop me an email at erik@bowmanfinancialstrategies.com or go to the Bowman financial strategies website and send me a note on our contact page. In addition, you can always search for topics of interest in my archive on our podcast page at www.bowmenfinancialstrategies.com/podcasts. Have a great day. Disclosure: 03:30 This communication does not constitute federal tax advice and may not be used as such. Please consult a qualified tax professional for tax advice or assistance. In addition, investment advisory services offered by Change Path LLC, a registered investment adviser. Change Path and Bowman Financial Strategies are unaffiliated entities.
Erik: 00:01 Welcome to Mastering Monday, the interview segment. Hi, I'm Erik Bowman, your host and owner of Bowman financial strategies where we provide straight answers so you can make confident decisions to live the retirement you have always dreamed up. I wanted to thank you for listening to the interview segment and this is part three of three episodes of an interview with Janelle Graham fitness trainer out of Castle Rock, Colorado's 24 hour fitness, enjoy. Janelle, what would be the one piece of advice that you would give to somebody who's currently retired or is going to be retiring soon and why? Janelle: 00:45 My biggest piece of advice would be to move. You got to move. Moving is improving and if we're not moving, then we're not improving. It's not just sitting from a desk chair into your couch or in your recliners, um, although that's much comfier than your work situation may have been. But actually getting up and being mobile and actually moving, getting outdoors, sometimes indoors, whatever it takes, but actually moving for at least 30 minutes, 30 minutes Erik: 01:21 Each day. Janelle: 01:23 Yes, consciously moving because moving is going to keep you improving. And if you're not moving, then your body is not improving and it, it's gonna start shutting down. Erik: 01:32 I was thinking about some of the things you probably are helping people with during training sessions. And I believe that when people are at their house and they're doing their everyday things, whatever, whatever that may be, cooking in the kitchen, doing laundry, going up and down the stairs, cleaning out their basement, all the photographs that they plan on going through, one day they're down in the basement and now they have to move boxes out of the, out of the way to get to them so they can start that project in retirement that they should be thinking about every movement when they're going down the stairs, they should be thinking about what muscle they're using, how their balance is actually being impacted by that step up or down the stairs when they're bending over to pick something off the bottom of the pantry floor that they don't just in a non thoughtful way reached down that they should think about what joints are using and the more time they get in the gym with somebody like you, that can actually start to kind of overlay, here's why this exercise is important to your normal daily life routine. And I just think that that's something that gets missed a lot of the times because they don't realize that there are ways to move the can hurt you and ways to move that can help you. Janelle: 02:39 Absolutely. Taking what they're doing on a daily basis and really making it even more efficient. Right. And making it move efficient and more balance and more stability and more strength so that they can do more. Right, and they feel like moving more because they're actually moving better, right? They're moving more efficiently. It doesn't hurt to bend down and pick up that box (right) of photos and have to carry it up the staircase because you've learned how to move. That improves your everyday lifestyle. Erik: 03:12 Success breeds success. Whenever you begin an exercise regimen. I think some people may be concerned or be thinking about the idea that it could hurt, number one, especially if you haven't done it in a long time. So there's this progression in a way to move into it slowly but also some reality check on how quickly results come and to understand what that cycle actually looks like so they don't get maybe disappointed and checkout sooner than they should. Janelle: 03:47 You should feel a difference within four to six weeks. So you should feel that walking around your house is easier. Bending down to pick up the groceries and walk them into the house gets easier. So it's a progressional base. As you do more, you kind of oil all of your joints and you oil your body, it's going to start to move better. And those aches and pains that you used to have should start to go away within four to six weeks and you should start to feel a little bit better. And then that progresses you into the next phase to where you can start taking on a little bit more. But it's all based off of where you're at and giving you specifics of what to do written down. Um, also videotaping is another great way because then you have a compare and contrast. Like, all right, this is whenever you started at week one, how you were squatting and how you are lifting your arms up to put something into a cabinet and now you've gotten a sequence of exercises that you're supposed to be doing at home, right? And progressively, okay, now where you at six to eight weeks later and retaking a video because then you have that visual. Now it's not just a feeling anymore. You feel that you're better, you feel it. The aches and pains are gone, but what have I actually improved on? Erik: 05:15 You don't have to ask the grand kids to open up the mayonnaise jars. Janelle: 05:18 There you go! You know it's true. It's totally the truth. So those little things speak volumes, but it's being aware of, hey, maybe you didn't even notice that whatever was aching or painful isn't achy or painful anymore and you can't figure out exactly what it was. But over the last four to six weeks, just changing up what you're doing and how you're doing it because you have a sequence of things and you know what to do to help make it successful. Erik: 05:54 Talk a little bit about if somebody was actually seeking a trainer, what's that first meeting like? What do you talk about? What do you typically do with somebody at the gym? Janelle: 06:04 The first meeting is really just to get to know you. It's to find out about what you're doing currently. Also about your past history. So what did you do in the past? Uh, what was your job? What were some of your activities? Do you have kids? You know, what are your goals? Are you wanting to travel? So it's a lot of one on one time, just kind of getting to know you. Then we sit down and we talk about nutrition. Okay, right? How are you eating? What are you consuming? Because then that kind of gives me a baseline, um, as a trainer to know, okay, this is what you currently did. This was your past history. Here are some goals. So we try to lay out at least three goals. Now I've have your nutrition, so I'm starting to get to know you a little bit better. Janelle: 06:49 Then we take you into what we call an overhead squat assessment. I'm going to set you up and stand and I'm going to have you squat and do what your body is going to allow you to do and we look at you and different angles and take notes and that gives me a baseline of how your body is moving in time and space currently. Okay. And that gives me a direction to go and to help you to get you closer to those goals that we talked about and what you're wanting to achieve. Now that you're retired and you have all this extra time on your hands. Erik: 07:22 And I assume that you know, based on that functional assessment that then you can determine me a more specific regimen to help address their shortfalls as opposed to just kind of a generic everybody should do. Although there are probably some exercises everybody should do, but I assume you see people with various range of motion issues and strength issues and core issues that would require a more specialized approach. Janelle: 07:47 Yes. So everyone is going to move differently and it doesn't matter how tall you are, how short you are, how much you weigh, right? It's what your body is actually allowing you to do in that time and space. And every individual that comes in is going to have a completely different plan, (right.) than the person before or after them. Even if you have 10 gentlemen and 10 ladies that are all 5'8" and they all weigh the same amount, all 10 men and all 10 women are going to all move differently. Right? (Right.) So they're all going to have a completely different exercise and cardio regimen that they need to do based off of where their body is. Erik: 08:31 Some people may be thinking about the type of exercise they might do in their home and it sounds a little bit solitary, maybe are not that enjoyable. What are some things that people could consider that might make exercising more enjoyable or even something they look forward to? Janelle: 08:46 Yeah. And make it fun. Um, so getting together with a friend and go for a walk outside or even getting together the group of people, finding a group that's a walking group or a skiing group, if that's, you know, your interests at home, pulling up a podcast and doing, you know, what's on that podcast. Erik: 09:08 So like an exercise podcast? Janelle: 09:09 Yeah, there's exercise podcasts. You can get stuff through dish network and direct TV. Um, they've got different exercise workouts, Erik: 09:18 Youtube as well. Janelle:
Erik: 00:01 Welcome to mastering Monday, the interview segment. Hi, I'm Erik Bowman, your host and owner of Bowman financial strategies where we provide straight answers so you can make confident decisions to live the retirement you have always dreamed of. This is the second part of a three part interview with Janelle Graham fitness trainer out of Castle Rock, Colorado is 24 hour fitness. If you were to recommend anything to a senior too, be healthier, what are the few things that you think are going to be the most important to achieve? 80% of the optimal results. And that goes towards a little bit of a concept I talk about with my clients, the 80 20 principle that there is a certain number of activities where you can achieve really good results and by doing more activities your marginal return starts to shrink a little bit. So what are the top things, do you think anybody who's a senior citizen should be considering to try to be a little more active and a little safer and healthier? Janelle: 01:04 I would say number one is an exercise regimen to routine. Number two would be nutrition. What are they in taking on a daily basis to help get them healthier and stay healthier to live longer. And number three I would think would be a mindset. Our minds are huge benefactor, but they can also be a disadvantage if we are in a good mindset that feeds into how our bodies actually act and react to what we think. Erik: 01:38 Well, let's go ahead and break that down one step further than exercise. What are the top one or two things that you would recommend somebody does for an exercise regimen if they haven't done much for the last couple of decades and now they've got some time on their hands and they want to prepare for retirement? What are the top two things that you would recommend they do Janelle: 01:57 From an exercise standpoint? Number one would be getting up and just walking. So we talked a little bit about cardio, so getting out and just walking a few blocks and then gradually increasing that to like a mile or so. (Okay.) And the second one would definitely be a strength training regimen. So actually getting the muscles and the bones stronger. Erik: 02:16 If they're not going to the gym and they don't have a gym membership, what could they do around the house to help develop some strength? Janelle: 02:24 You could use anything in your cupboard. So soup cans, chairs, anything from your kitchen table chairs to even your sofa sitting and standing. If you have a staircase, just stepping up and down on the staircase will build leg strength. But then you're also going to have a little bit of a heartbeat increases as well. So there's a lot of things to surround your home inside, but also outside, Erik: 02:48 When it comes to nutrition (Mm-hmm?) What do you think the top one or two things are there? Janelle: 02:54 My biggest thing with nutrition is, it's not about what you eat, but how much actually consume. Enjoy what you're eating. But how much of it are you actually in taking on a nutrition basis? Really being aware of, okay, I really want steak and potatoes and Erik: 03:12 chocolate cake, Janelle: 03:13 chocolate cake! Some cookies. Absolutely. But learning how to actually give yourself that, okay, I can have this, but watching how much we're actually in taking. So instead of having a full cookie splitting in half, Erik: 03:30 I was going to say instead of having five have two, but instead of one, we'll have the half out there. Might agree with two instead of five. Janelle: 03:38 They probably will. Okay. Erik: 03:41 I think hydration is a big thing, especially out here in Colorado because every joint in the body, all of your connective tissue requires that. And I think there's a lot of things on the market that you can buy. But what are your thoughts on just water? Janelle: 03:54 That's the second big thing with nutrition. So first we talked about food and consumption, but like you said, the water aspect is huge. That is something that you need to really take into consideration. It's not just the tea and the coffee and maybe the soda that you have, but just pure water that you're in taking on a daily basis and making sure that you're getting enough because that's going to help keep the body moving functionally. How it's supposed to move and give the joints and the muscles that lubrication that they need. Um, your body's like a car. You take your car in to get it checked up and get it fixed up and make sure everything's working well. Change the oil. Yeah, you got to change the oil. Sometimes it needs new brakes or new tires. Do you think about your body as the same thing? Your body is a machine and there's different tuneups and different things that we need to do and water is one of those tune ups (Right.) that just keep things moving fluid, (Right) and keep the body moving fluid like the oil in your car. Erik: 04:58 Many people, they have been focused on raising children, uh, volunteering at school, working full time for decades and now it's time to maybe start thinking about themselves for the first time in a long time. And if exercise is a part of that, one of the questions that I think they should have answered is how do you transition into an exercise regimen so that you can do it safely without injuring yourself and so that you can enjoy it enough that you don't quit Janelle: 05:28 With a workout routine or regimen really comes down to what are your goals and what are you personally wanting to achieve? Thinking about, okay, well now I've got all this time on my hands and I'm excited about it. What have I done currently or in the past that could help me further myself forwards and get into what are your interests? You're wanting to go skiing, right? Or take that trip overseas. So first having what we're wanting to do because then that keeps us motivated. We have to have a motivator to get us going sometimes. So if we have a motivator to get us going and then we gradually work into those stepping stones to get you through that. So a similar case would be a gentleman that comes in and works out personally with me. He had retired and been retired for a few years and him and his wife for wanting to go on a vacation and he hadn't been moving, he'd been more sedentary. So how do we get him up and how do we get him moving? And so it's stepping stones, just teaching them how to actually squat properly, sit and stand, and really working on balance, giving different things balance wise because we have to have a lot of balance. And that's one of the biggest things that ends up going as we get a little bit older that's going to help with walking. Erik: 06:54 So part of what you're reviewing or training of the client in, in that particular scenario are specific exercises and routines that focus on balance? Janelle: 07:06 Like standing on one foot, Erik: 07:07 okay, Janelle: 07:08 Just standing on your right leg and pulling your left leg up, walking heel to toe down a straight line. So very simplistic things. A lot of people are like, oh well I can do that. And then you ask them to do it and they're like, oh my goodness, I thought I had great balance. (Right.) You know, but very simple stuff that you can do every day just in your own home. You don't have to come to the gym to do. So it's kind of almost like your homework (yeah). That you do on your own. And it's, um, simplistic everyday life stuff. But those are the building blocks we have to get into place first to lay a foundation, right? Because once we lay a good foundation, you get going every few weeks and by three to four months down the road, he's squatting without a chair or a box behind him. Janelle: 07:52 He's able to stand on one foot. He notices that he can step off of a curb without being worried about catching himself and he's getting in and out of his car easier. Right? Not grunting, no. Right. Or like, Ooh, ow, this hurts or that hurts. Yeah. We've got those few months underneath our belt and now he's got another month or two before he actually leaves for his trip. (Right.) And so now we've built those building blocks. We've laid down stones and a pathway to help him get there. And now we can actually progress a little bit further and get him stronger to go on his trip. Erik: 08:31 Thank you for joining us for the second of three episodes with the interview segment with Janelle Graham fitness trainer from Castle Rock, Colorado's 24 hour fitness. You can leave comments on our Facebook page or on our website at www.bowmanandfinancialstrategies.com Disclosure: 08:56 Investment advisory services offered by Change Path LLC, change path and Bowman financial strategies are unaffiliated entities.
Comments
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
United States