DiscoverChurch History Matters089 Was Zion's Camp Violent?
089 Was Zion's Camp Violent?

089 Was Zion's Camp Violent?

Update: 2024-11-12
Share

Description

In November 1833, ruthless mobs of local settlers drove over a thousand Church members out of Jackson County, Missouri, plundering their property and burning their homes to dissuade them from ever returning. These battered and scattered saints took refuge that winter in various nearby counties while local Church leaders sent desperate letters to Ohio to seek the counsel of the prophet Joseph Smith. As the prophet petitioned the Lord’s guidance on the matter he was told, among other things, to have those scattered saints petition government leaders for help, which they did. In fact Missouri Governor Daniel Dunklin was quite sympathetic to the saints’ plight and expressed his willingness to provide a military guard to escort the saints back to their lands and property in Jackson County. The only problem, he said, was that he could not authorize a standing army to be stationed there for the ongoing protection of the saints.


This essential piece of news would soon factor heavily into the decision of Joseph Smith and over 200 saints from the East to march nearly a thousand miles to Missouri in what became known as Zion’s camp. Their aim was to join with the governor’s military escort of the saints into Jackson County and then become that standing army who would ensure the resettlement and safety of their scattered friends once Governor Dunklin’s troops withdrew.  


In this episode of Church History Matters, we dig in to some of the ins and outs of Zion’s Camp and discuss what the march of a quasi-military group of Latter-day Saints led by a prophet of God might teach us about peace and violence among Latter-day Saints.


For show notes and transcript for this and other episodes go to https://doctrineandcovenantscentral.org/church-history-matters-podcast/   

Comments (1)

Jann Valencia

I usually love this show. However, I really had a difficult time with the repeated use of the word "rhetoric" when referring to words of revelation quoted in this podcast. Though there is more than one meaning to the word, I believe it is now most commonly used negatively and connotes insincere, bombastic speech. Therefore, it came across to me as inappropriate and disrespectful, and I found myself cringing over and over again. I'm sure it wasn't meant that way, but it was hard to ignore.

Nov 14th
Reply
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

089 Was Zion's Camp Violent?

089 Was Zion's Camp Violent?

Scripture Central