Bradley and Karen discuss two additional permissions that can be used
to “backport” the GPLv3
Termination provisions to GPLv2
— the Kernel Enforcement Statement Additional Permission, and the
Red Hat Cooperation Commitment. A blog post on Conservancy's site summarizes the discussion on this show.

Show Notes:

Segment 0 (00:35 )

• Bradley mentioned irregardless
  is not actually a word, but it does appear to be slang, which dates
  back to 1795! (03:23 )



• The
  additional permission system was codified as a formal part of
  GPLv3, but are generally more informal under GPLv2. (05:24 )



• Karen explained what the Principles
  of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement. (07:49 )



• Karen mentioned that Daleks <q>terminate!</q>
  (08:51 )

Segment 1 (13:04 )

• Bradley mentioned the inbound=outbound FOSS licensing
  contributor assent system (18:15 )

Segment 2 (26:10 )

• Karen and Bradley discuss the term “non-defensive” and what
  it means.



• Bradley mentioned the Twin
  Peaks lawsuit as a non-hypothetical case where the RHCC would not
  apply where GPL enforcement was used by Red Hat itself as a retaliation
  tactic. (29:23 )



• The Kernel
  Enforcement Statement and the RHCC
  are available online.

Segment 3 (38:40 )

The next episode of will be an interview with Molly De Blanc and
recording of her keynote at CopyleftConf 2019

Send feedback and comments on the cast
to <oggcast@faif.us>.
You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and
by following Conservancy on
identi.ca and and Twitter.

Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch
of danlynch.org.
Theme
music written and performed
by Mike Tarantino
with Charlie Paxson on drums.

The content
of this
audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed
under the Creative
Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).