Pourquoi notre cerveau assez mal câblé pour raisonner rationnellement en politique ? Pourquoi on persévère dans des croyances fausses ou des idées politiques incohérentes avec nos valeurs ou objectifs ?

On parle de ça avec Antoine Marie, chercheur en psychologie politique !

Sources et liens :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergroup_relationsBoghossian & Lindsay. How to Have Impossible Conversations: A Very Practical Guidehttps://www.amazon.com/How-Have-Impossible-Conversations-Practical/dp/0738285323Haidt. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Righteous_MindMoral Foundations Theory:The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism Graham, Haidt et al.https://cpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.uci.edu/dist/1/863/files/2020/06/Graham-et-al-2013.AESP_.pdfFernbach et al. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understandinghttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23620547/Boyer. Minds Make Societies: How Cognition Explains the World Humans : Createhttps://www.amazon.com/Minds-Make-Societies-Cognition-Explains/dp/0300223455Pinker. The Blank Slate/Comprendre la Nature humaine : https://www.odilejacob.fr/catalogue/sciences/neurosciences/comprendre-la-nature-humaine_9782738115881.phpPinsof et al. Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systemshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2274433Kurzban et al. Sex, drugs and moral goals: reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2982222/A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choicehttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/mutualistic-approach-to-morality-the-evolution-of-fairness-by-partner-choice/458BA966DC93C272907C4CF4CE5C9F6DEcology-driven stereotypes override race stereotypes : https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1519401113Cosmides et al. Perceptions of race : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661303000573Pietrazewski et al. Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010027715000578Vote RN : pourquoi le racisme compte, Par Félicien Fauryhttps://aoc.media/analyse/2024/05/22/vote-rn-pourquoi-le-racisme-compte/How Gullible are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Sciencehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1037/gpr0000111Mercier. Not born yesterday/Pas né de la dernière pluie https://www.humensciences.com/livre/Pas-ne-de-la-derniere-pluie/116Mercier & Sperber. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theoryhttps://www.dan.sperber.fr/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/MercierSperberWhydohumansreason.pdfLees & Cikara. Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contextshttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0766-4Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2204045119Interventions to reduce partisan animosity https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01442-3Mernyk et al. Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violencehttps://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2116851119Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind 6th EditionDavid Busshttps://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychology-New-Science-Mind/dp/1138088617Al-Shawaf et al. Thirteen Misunderstandings About Natural Selectionhttps://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2018/07/13-Misunderstandings-About-Natural-Selection.pdfSociopolitical Intellectual Humility as a Predictor of Political Attitudes and Behavioral Intentionshttps://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/article/view/5553/5553.htmlDaryl Davis: the black musician who converts Ku Klux Klan members : https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/mar/18/daryl-davis-black-musician-who-converts-ku-klux-klan-members