192: Scope of duty since Khan v Meadows
Update: 2024-01-25
Description
Rachel Marcus and Marcus Coates-Walker of 1 Crown Office Row join Lucy McCann to explore the principle of the scope of duty in the context of clinical negligence claims. First by analysing the decision in Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21 and then discussing how the courts have grappled with scope of duty issues since.
Cases discussed in this episode include:
- Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21
- McFarlane v Tayside Board of Health [2000] 2 AC 59
- Groom v Selby [2001] EWCA Civ 1522
- Parkinson v St James & Seacroft UH NHS Trust [2001] EWCA Civ 530
- SD v Grampian Health Board [2022] CSOH 63
- DD v NHS Fife Health Board [2022] SAC (Civ) 27
- Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB)
- McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board [2023] UKSC 26
- McFarlane v Tayside Board of Health [2000] 2 AC 59
- Groom v Selby [2001] EWCA Civ 1522
- Parkinson v St James & Seacroft UH NHS Trust [2001] EWCA Civ 530
- SD v Grampian Health Board [2022] CSOH 63
- DD v NHS Fife Health Board [2022] SAC (Civ) 27
- Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB)
- McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board [2023] UKSC 26
Law Pod UK is published by 1 Crown Office Row. Supporting articles are published on the UK Human Rights Blog. Follow and interact with the podcast team on Twitter.
Comments
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
In Channel
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
x
