399. Guidelines: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure – Question #37 with Dr. Clyde Yancy
Description
The following question refers to Section 7.4 of the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure.
The question is asked by the Director of the CardioNerds Internship Dr. Akiva Rosenzveig, answered first by Vanderbilt AHFT cardiology fellow Dr. Jenna Skowronski, and then by expert faculty Dr. Clyde Yancy.
Dr. Yancy is Professor of Medicine and Medical Social Sciences, Chief of Cardiology, and Vice Dean for Diversity and Inclusion at Northwestern University, and a member of the ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
The Decipher the Guidelines: 2022 AHA / ACC / HFSA Guideline for The Management of Heart Failure series was developed by the CardioNerds and created in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America. It was created by 30 trainees spanning college through advanced fellowship under the leadership of CardioNerds Cofounders Dr. Amit Goyal and Dr. Dan Ambinder, with mentorship from Dr. Anu Lala, Dr. Robert Mentz, and Dr. Nancy Sweitzer. We thank Dr. Judy Bezanson and Dr. Elliott Antman for tremendous guidance.
American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2024
- As heard in this episode, the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2024 is coming up November 16-18 in Chicago, Illinois at McCormick Place Convention Center. Come a day early for Pre-Sessions Symposia, Early Career content, QCOR programming and the International Symposium on November 15. It’s a special year you won’t want to miss for the premier event for advancements in cardiovascular science and medicine as AHA celebrates its 100th birthday. Registration is now open, secure your spot here!
- When registering, use code NERDS and if you’re among the first 20 to sign up, you’ll receive a free 1-year AHA Professional Membership!
<svg viewBox="0 0 192 512" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M0 384.662V127.338c0-17.818 21.543-26.741 34.142-14.142l128.662 128.662c7.81 7.81 7.81 20.474 0 28.284L34.142 398.804C21.543 411.404 0 402.48 0 384.662z"></path></svg>
<svg viewBox="0 0 320 512" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M288.662 352H31.338c-17.818 0-26.741-21.543-14.142-34.142l128.662-128.662c7.81-7.81 20.474-7.81 28.284 0l128.662 128.662c12.6 12.599 3.676 34.142-14.142 34.142z"></path></svg>
Question #37
Mr. S is an 80-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism who had an anterior myocardial infarction (MI) treated with a drug-eluting stent to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) 45 days ago. His course was complicated by a new LVEF reduction to 30%, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) with QRS duration of 152 ms in normal sinus rhythm. He reports he is feeling well and is able to enjoy gardening without symptoms, though he experiences dyspnea while walking to his bedroom on the second floor of his house. Repeat TTE shows persistent LVEF of 30% despite initiation of goal-directed medical therapy (GDMT). What is the best next step in his management? | |
A | Monitor for LVEF improvement for a total of 60 days prior to further intervention |
B | Implantation of a dual-chamber ICD |
C | Implantation of a CRT-D |
D | Continue current management as device implantation is contraindicated given his advanced age |
<svg viewBox="0 0 192 512" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M0 384.662V127.338c0-17.818 21.543-26.741 34.142-14.142l128.662 128.662c7.81 7.81 7.81 20.474 0 28.284L34.142 398.804C21.543 411.404 0 402.48 0 384.662z"></path></svg>
<svg viewBox="0 0 320 512" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M288.662 352H31.338c-17.818 0-26.741-21.543-14.142-34.142l128.662-128.662c7.81-7.81 20.474-7.81 28.284 0l128.662 128.662c12.6 12.599 3.676 34.142-14.142 34.142z"></path></svg>
Answer #37
Explanation
| Choice C is correct. Implantation of a CRT-D is the best next step.
In patients with nonischemic DCM or ischemic heart disease at least 40 days post-MI with LVEF ≤35% and NYHA class II or III symptoms on chronic GDMT, who have reasonable expectation of meaningful survival for >1 year, ICD therapy is recommended for primary prevention of SCD to reduce total mortality (Class 1, LOE A). A transvenous ICD provides high economic value in this setting, particularly when a patient’s risk of death from ventricular arrhythmia is deemed high and the risk of nonarrhythmic death is deemed low.
In addition, for patients who have LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, left bundle branch block (LBBB) with a QRS duration ≥150 ms, and NYHA class II, III, or ambulatory IV symptoms on GDMT, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated to reduce total mortality, reduce hospitalizations, and improve symptoms and QOL. Cardiac resynchronization provides high economic value in this setting.
Mr. S therefore meets criteria for both ICD and CRT.
Choice A is incorrect. All patients should be on maximally tolerated doses of GDMT prior to consideration of device implantation to allow for assessment of LVEF recovery. Patients who have experienced myocardial infarction should be reassessed 40 days after the event and after achieving maximally tolerated doses of GDMT.
Choice B in incorrect. For patients in sinus rhythm with a LBBB morphology and QRS duration >150 ms with an LVEF ≤35%, there were significant improvements in 6-minute walk test performance, quality of life, NYHA classification, and LVEF after implantation of CRT. Mortality and hospitalizations were also found to be decreased in patients with CRT-P & CRT-D. Overall, CRT has been shown to have high economic value in these patients.
It should be noted that CRT has the most benefit in patients with a wide QRS (>150 ms), LBBB morphology, and LVEF ≤35%, though trials have shown a modest benefit in special populations. CRT has a Class 2a recommendation (LOE B-NR) in patients with LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, and NYHA Class II, III, or ambulatory IV symptoms on GDMT, with either: a) Non-LBBB pattern with a QRS duration ≥150 ms b) LBBB with a QRS duration of 120 to 149 ms
Choice D is incorrect. If LVEF remains ≤35% in a patient with a life expectancy >1 year, trials have shown that ICD placement for primary prevention reduces sudden cardiac death and also has a high economic value. There is no indication that this patient has a life expectancy < 1 year.
|
Main Takeaway | In patients 40 days post-MI on GDMT with an LVEF that remains ≤35%, ICD therapy for primary prevention is appropriate and cost effective. For those additional w  Comments Top Podcasts The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024 In Channel   Download from Google Play  Download from App Store  United States00:00 00:00 x   399. Guidelines: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure – Question #37 with Dr. Clyde YancyCardioNerds |