8. Alex Owczarczak, Student Judicial Intern Clerk at U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Update: 2015-05-22
Description
 |
| The Federal Circuit |
This is not legal advice. Leave audio feedback at (512) 686-6329. This show was recorded and edited using GNU/Linux.
Expected Audience: law students and attorneys interested in decision tree analysis
First off, on top of our usual disclaimer, nothing Alex says should be taken as a statement by the U.S. government or the U.S. Court of Appeals.
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="30" mozallowfullscreen="true" src="http://archive.org/embed/MusicManumitLawcast008AlexO" webkitallowfullscreen="true" width="500"></iframe>
mp3 audio | ogg audio | torrent | unedited video
Interview notes after the break.
Can you tell us a bit about your background?
Intern at Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit
All patent law appeals. Special subject matter jurisdiction. Administrative appeals
Many things dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Before we get into the note, you helped file an amicus brief for a DNA decision handed down yesterday. Do you want to discuss that at all?
isolated DNA is not patent eligible.
SCOTUS handled it properly.
We don't need a play-by-play on the note. People can go and read it, but just tell us a bit about the note so people know what we are talking about.
IDEA doesn’t stand for anything!
How is a decision tree different than a flow chart?
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; font-
Comments
In Channel
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
1.0x
