DiscoverLitigator Libations89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records
89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records

89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records

Update: 2025-06-13
Share

Description

Send us a text

This week we discuss United States v. Brinkman-Coronel, where the CAAF acknowledges that cellular phones are unique under the Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment analysis, but then presses on to treat third party consent to the search of a cell phone in the same manner as third party consent to search a brief case.  Disappointing.  We then hear from Captain Elliot Ko with a very thoughtful discussion of MRE 513 in regard to Family Advocacy records -- including seven specific suggestions for defenders.  

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records

89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records

Darrel-the-DCAP