ONTARIO OVITT FAMILY COMMUNITY LIBRARY LOCATED AT 215 E. C STREET, ONTARIO, CA. THIRD PARTIES ENGAGED IN FEDERAL GROUP STALKING AND MONITORING AT THIS VENUE ARE ALSO ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF HARASSMENT, THREATS AND SUMMONING THE POLICE, WHICH IS A PATTERN AT THIS PARTICULAR VENUE. THE ALLEGATION OF YELLING IS NOT ONLY FALSE, BUT THE THIRD PARTIES IMPLIEDLY ADMIT TO ONGOING KNOWLEDGE OF EVERYTHING I SAY AND DO AS THEY ARE IN RELEVANT POSITION TO ME GROUP STALKING AND MONITORING IN CONCERT WITH EACH OTHER AND THE STATE THAT IS SURROUNDING VIA AIRCRAFTS AND POLICE, FIRE, AND AMBULANCE. I DID NOT YELL OR SPEAK OUT LOUD AS I STOOD AT THE ELEVATOR WAITING TO GO TO THE BOTTOM LEVEL. AS I LISTENED TO MUSIC WITH MY HEADPHONES, I SAW THE THIRD PARTY SECURITY GUARD "FRANK" LOOKING IN MY DIRECTION AND AS I STEP ONTO THE ELEVATOR I UTTER UNDER MY BREATH TO MYSELF HOW "UGLY" HE IS WHILE THIRD PARTIES SURROUND ENGAGED IN ACTIVITY AND CONVERSATIONS AT LOUDER VOLUME. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT "FRANK" AND THE THIRD PARTY EMPLOYEE, CARLOS OR ANYONE ELSE, FOR THAT MATTER, *NATURALLY* HEARD ME SAY ANYTHING, BUT THE DOCUMENTATION IS REVEALING BASED ON THEIR KNOWLEDGE THAT I STATED THAT FRANK IS UGLY. IN ORDER TO MAKE THE REVEALING ALLEGATION PLAUSIBLE (AND TO CONTINUE WITH THE IMMEDIATE CLAIM OF THE SECURITY GUARD, FRANK, WHO RAN DOWN STAIRS AND IN FACT, YELLED AT ME TO LEAVE THE LIBRARY AS I GOT OFF THE ELEVATOR DOWNSTAIRS) THE THIRD PARTY, CARLOS ALLEGES THAT I RANDOMLY YELLED AT FRANK THAT HE IS UGLY, WHICH ALSO WOULD HAVE BEEN CAPTURED ON SURVEILLANCE CAMERA IF IT HAD OCCURRED. THIRD PARTIES ARE MONITORING ME AT THIS VENUE, AND THEN FABRICATE AN ALLEGATION OF ERRATIC AND UNCHARACTERISTIC CONDUCT, WHICH IS A METHOD OF EXPRESSING HOSTILITY AS I AM AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THEY ARE MONITORING AND ARE INDEED LISTENING VERY CLOSELY TO ALL I SAY AND DO (INCLUDING INSIDE OF THE BATHROOM). IN OTHER WORDS, I DID SAY UNDER MY BREATH THAT FRANK IS UGLY AS I GOT ON THE ELEVATOR VERY AWARE OF THE FACT THAT FRANK, EVERY OTHER THIRD PARTY IN RELEVANT POSITION, AND THE STATE ARE JOINTLY LISTENING TO ME WHISPER THIS, WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE HEARD FROM THE CIRCULATION DESK AS I STOOD ACROSS THE ROOM AT THE ELEVATOR. THIS ACT OF HARASSMENT IS POC AND IT IS ALSO AN IMPLIED ADMISSION BY THIRD PARTY GROUP STALKERS (THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE) THAT ARE MONITORING ME AND ENGINEERING A NARRATIVE AS TO HOW THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO HEAR ME CALL FRANK UGLY AT THE DISTANCE WE WERE AT AMONG THE ACTIVITY AND LOUDER CONVERSATIONS SURROUNDING. IT IS ALSO RELEVANT TO NOTE THAT AT THIS TIME I WAS ROUTINELY USING THE LIBRARY AS I WAS PREPARING MY CIVIL CASE VERSUS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (ERICA LORRAINE SPENCER v PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA [CASE CIVDS1927330]), WHICH IS FULLY KNOWN AS ALL I DO IS BEING MONITORED. *********REALTIME DOCUMENTATION OF THE PUBLIC ENTITY, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS IT IS ENGAGED IN A CEASELESS, MALICIOUS, AND CRIMINAL PATTERN OF CONDUCT (POC) INTENDED TO MONITOR MYSELF, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.  THIS CRIMINAL SYSTEM IS REFERRED TO AS FEDERAL GROUP STALKING & MONITORING VIA COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND IT IS IN VIOLATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL LAW: 18 USC §§2261A(1) & 2261A(2).  I FURTHER ADVOCATE ADDITIONAL FEDERAL LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO ADDRESS EVERY CRIMINAL TACTIC OF A PUBLIC ENTITY ENGAGED IN CRIMINAL MONITORING WITH COMMUNICATION DEVICES (SYSTEMATIC INFLICTION OF INHUMANE SUFFERING [S.I.I.S.] FEDERAL LEGISLATION). THE STATE'S P.O.C. IS CRIMINAL AS IT IS MONITORING IN CONCERT WITH THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE VIA COMMUNICATION DEVICES BY CEASELESS ENGAGEMENT IN THE 3 CRIMINAL ELEMENTS FOR MONITORING: 1. LIGHT, 2. ACTIVITY (AUDIBLE/VISIBLE/ SENSATIONAL), AND 3. RELEVANT POSITIONING (PERPETUAL PRESENCE IN MY PATH, WHICH IS STALKING THAT IS ACCOMPLISHED AS A GROUP).  FURTHER RELEVANT CONTEXT IS THAT THE STATE'S P.O.C. IS NOT ONLY CRIMINAL- IT IS OF THE DEMONIC. INDEED, THIS IS A SATANIC MONITORING SYSTEM PRACTICED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.