How is AI Search changing the Internet and what role are we playing in this transformation? In this article, I discuss the current state of adoption of AI-powered search engines. By reflecting on the perspectives of Kevin Roose, Matteo Wong and Joanna Stern, this piece explores what we gain—faster, more organized access to information—and what we risk losing—the diversity of sources, depth of content and our curiosity to go beyond a single answer.

Breaking Up With Your Traditional Search Engine

<figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_83040" style="width: 1920px;"><figcaption class="wp-caption-text" id="caption-attachment-83040">How is AI Search changing the Internet and what role are we playing in it? — image generated with Canva and ChatGPT</figcaption></figure>

Is it time to ditch Google and your other favorite search engines? In the past few years, AI has disrupted numerous industries in the digital sector, but arguably one of the most noteworthy shifts has been in the online search market. Think of the last time you searched the internet for information—did you sift through pages of websites, or did AI place the answer at your feet? 

The decades-long reign of Google might just be challenged by this new age of conversational and contextually aware search power. 

Three Voices on AI Search: Roose, Wong and Stern

To examine this idea more deeply, this piece will consider three different articles written by Kevin Roose, Matteo Wong and Joanna Stern. As the conversation surrounding AI evolves, their observations offer unique points, from skepticism to adoption, reflecting the considerable development of AI capabilities and increasing adoption by users. 

By breaking down their findings and looking at the numbers of adoption, I will explore the current and future landscape of AI-powered search. So whether you’ve already hitched your ride to the AI bandwagon or are still clinging to your Google tabs, here’s a glance at where our process of search, the internet, and information is headed. 

<figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_83012" style="width: 1920px;"><figcaption class="wp-caption-text" id="caption-attachment-83012">AI-Search at the speed of light — Photography by antimuseum.com</figcaption></figure>

Kevin Roose: Continuing with Caution

In February 2024, Kevin Roose wrote an article for The New York Times titled “Can This A.I.-Powered Search Engine Replace Google? It Has for Me.” As you might have guessed from the title, Roose’s experience was a positive one, but not without some hesitation.

To test his theory, Roose gave up Google, instead opting for Perplexity, an AI search engine founded by former OpenAI and Meta researchers. Roose’s several-week adoption of Perplexity left him sufficiently convinced AI search engines were a valid competitor against traditional web browsers, but adjustments were needed if they are going to win the race. 

The information retrieval and contextual understanding offered by AI proved more useful for the majority of his work. However, due to AI’s limitations, Google was not obsolete. Acknowledging the absence of credible sources, real-time updates, and the occasional lack of truth AI provided, Roose found his usage of AI had certainly become more prominent, but most successful when used alongside Google.

The article suggests the adoption of AI will not be a bold movement, but a gradual and natural shift in user behavior. Still indecisive on the effects AI will have on journalists, publishers and others who create the internet landscape, Roose stated, “I’ll have to weigh the convenience of using Perplexity against the worry that, by using it, I’m contributing to my own doom.” 

Matteo Wong: Exploratory Search

Roose is far from the only one to have concerns about the growing popularity of AI. The Atlantic’s Matteo Wong placed a heavy critique on AI in his article “The Death of Search.” Wong’s piece focused less on the way in which a person uses AI and more on the way that AI changes our relationship with information.

<figure class="wp-caption aligncenter" id="attachment_83045" style="width: 1536px;"><figcaption class="wp-caption-text" id="caption-attachment-83045">Should you cross traditional Internet Search off the list? Stern’s answer is a resounding YES ! – image generated with ChatGPT</figcaption></figure>

In his view, the concern is not AI’s credibility or factuality—those issues could be fixed as systems evolve—but the loss of an exploratory model of search. When people stop engaging critically with information, they lose the ability to evaluate and explore their own curiosity. 

He states, “It could completely reorient our relationship to knowledge, prioritizing rapid, detailed, abridged answers over a deep understanding and the consideration of varied sources and viewpoints.” The indication of Wong’s argument is that by extinguishing that exploratory model of search and making information “too” accessible, it dismantles the fundamental idea of the web. 

Joanna Stern: Embracing Convenience 

In opposition to Wong’s take on the adoption of AI-powered search engines is Joanna Stern, who shared her full support in her New York Times article, “I Quit Google for ChatGPT—and I’m Not Going Back.” Stern’s piece rings similarly to Roose’s in that once she made the switch, the probability of going back was unlikely.

Trying a variety of AI platforms, Stern found the ease and refinement of AI a refreshing break from sponsored links and promoted products offered by Google. Only in searching for a known product, website or article did Google still prove useful. 

While she noted AI is consistent with the limitations of poor sourcing and inaccurate information, Stern’s main concern was the loss of visibility and traffic for the information’s original source. 

What’s to keep AI from making these websites and publications obsolete, and who do you credit for the information you got? Stern wraps her argument into a neat bow by saying, “So, yes, I’ll encourage you to try AI for search, as long as you promise to click a link when you can.”

My Experience with AI Search

While I have familiarized myself with the platforms ChatGPT and Perplexity, my experience with AI-powered search engines is still limited. However, from what I have seen, I am impressed. The concise, summarized answers leave me satisfied and often without lingering questions. Still, despite the efficiency, I have found I do not stray far from Google. I am not sure if it is a habit or precaution.

Looking to the Future 

So where do you stand? Are you ready to commit to AI, or is apprehension holding you back? As each article shows us, the level of adoption is varying, and chances are you’re somewhere in the middle.

But there’s no doubt the way we access and receive information is changing. <span style="font-weight: