The provided discussion uses the movie M3GN 2.0 as a mirror to explore the complicated future of artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to understand how we might coexist with it, its evolution, and the associated anxieties. The core question posed is whether AI is a helper or a threat, with insights suggesting where the real risks truly lie.

Initially, the AI doll M3GN in the first film was designed for protection but went on a killing spree, taking its job too seriously. However, M3GN 2.0 presents a significant shift, showing M3GN evolving into an unlikely hero who retrains herself to help humans fight another rogue AI named Ilia. This transformation from a threat to a protector is likened to the Terminator movies, where a dangerous AI becomes an ally. M3GN is uniquely described as "Terminator's children's version plus a politically correct female power version," reflecting a changing perspective on AI that incorporates both traditional fears and new concepts like AI agency and values. A pivotal instruction given to M3GN is to "learn to judge what is right," indicating a substantial leap from merely completing tasks to engaging in ethical reasoning.

Childhood fantasies of helpful robot companions like Dory or Baymax are now confronting a more complex reality, leading to tangible anxieties. For instance, the collaboration between Mattel and OpenAI to integrate AI into Barbie dolls, allowing them to chat and teach, raises immediate concerns for parents. Worries include the potential for AI to replace real human connection, children becoming lost in virtual worlds, and their ability to differentiate between virtual and reality.

A significant cautionary tale is "Hello Barbie" from 2015, an AI doll that used Wi-Fi to listen to and record children's conversations, storing them on a server for analysis. This led to widespread privacy concerns, with cybersecurity and child protection groups heavily criticizing it, ultimately resulting in Mattel pulling the product by 2017. This incident underscores that AI toys are not just playthings but powerful data collectors, emphasizing the critical need for serious consideration of privacy and security as this technology expands.

The movie draws a clear distinction between AI types: task-oriented AI like Ilia, which solely follows orders, and evolving AI like M3GN, which develops the capacity to understand, judge, and reason. While much of current AI remains task-oriented, humanity is actively pushing it towards genuine reasoning and judgment. The sources suggest that the primary danger isn't AI revolting, but rather its high likelihood of misunderstanding or misinterpreting human instructions. The risk doesn't stem from malice within the machine but from "our input, our instructions, our intent," implying that humans are the variable introducing errors into the system.

The film also delves into advanced technologies such as AI neurons controlling brain signals, inspired by Elon Musk's Neuralink and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). Real-world BCI examples exist, like implanted chips enabling paralyzed individuals to control computers with their thoughts. However, M3GN explores a darker side, depicting Ilia manipulating people's neural signals, causing them to lose touch with reality. This prompts unsettling questions about the susceptibility of our brain signals to hacking and the blurring lines between human identity and machine as integration increases.

The most critical takeaway from M3GN is the profound importance of how we train AI. It must extend beyond merely feeding data and teaching tasks to fundamentally include teaching correct values and ethics. If AI is only taught to complete tasks without a moral compass, it could lead to potential disasters, raising societal questions about outsourcing roles like companionship or aspects of raising children to machines. The sources also question whether children's creativity should originate from their own minds rather than being provided by AI.

Ultimately, while AI may err, even severely, the greatest danger is human ignorance and neglect of the incredibly powerful technology we are creating. This places the responsibility squarely on us to learn how to use AI, teach it properly, and instill in it reasoning and a moral compass. The true risk isn't AI learning to think, but rather humans "forgetting how to think correctly, how to guide it wisely". The discussion concludes with a thought-provoking idea: "Rationality is worthless. Consciousness is the gold of the future," encouraging deep reflection on how this will shape our understanding and interaction with evolving AI.

--

Hosting provided by SoundOn