DiscoverAntitrust 101Antitrust 101: U.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours, 351 US 377 (1956)
Antitrust 101: U.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours, 351 US 377 (1956)

Antitrust 101: U.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours, 351 US 377 (1956)

Update: 2024-11-08
Share

Description

What is the cellophane fallacy? Is it more than just the fallacy of thinking you can use aluminum foil to do all of the jobs of cellophane (don’t try that at home!) Host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley is joined by Connecticut Assistant Attorney General Victoria Field and Massachusetts Assistant Attorney General Katherine Krems as they dive into market definition and substitution analysis and why it may not be enough to just use cross elasticities of demand.

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Antitrust 101: U.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours, 351 US 377 (1956)

Antitrust 101: U.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours, 351 US 377 (1956)

Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley