Arguing with a Presuppostionalist

Update: 2017-07-31

Description

I received this question a while back, and thought it was worth reviving it.How do I respond to presuppositionalist’s claim that circular logic is not fallacious? Because presuppositionalists say that since every worldview commits this fallacy. It leads to the absurd conclusion that every worldview is invalid (I am applying the principle of charity here, which means that the argument they present is actually weaker). Presuppositionalism is a school of Christian apologetic whose adherents think t. . . See the complete description at Logically Fallacious

Comments

In Channel

Choose Kind

2019-08-04--:--

Reductio Ad Consequentia - Reducing the Argument to the Consequences

2019-04-20--:--

If You Could Only Save One, Would You Save a Child or a Thoudand Embryos?

2017-10-2317:33

It's a Conspiracy!

2017-08-21--:--

Arguing with a Presuppostionalist

2017-07-31--:--

Welcome to the Upside Down

2017-07-18--:--

Women, Rape, and Responsibility

2017-07-11--:--

Top Five Logical Fallacies in the Social Justice Movement

2017-07-04--:--

Beliefs: The More Emotion is Involved, the Less Evidence is Required

2017-06-05--:--

What is the Evolutionary Benefit of Beliefs and How Can Beliefs Best Be Changed?

2017-06-05--:--

The Fundamental Attribution Error, Actor-observer Bias, and the Self-serving Bias. Oh My!

2017-06-05--:--

The Gentetic Fallacy and Probability

2016-11-20--:--

00:00

1.0x

Arguing with a Presuppostionalist

#box-pro-ellipsis-176032825793639{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Arguing with a Presuppostionalist

Arguing with a Presuppostionalist

Arguing with a Presuppostionalist