In this episode, we explore how certain jurisdictions remain outside the reach of CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) — and why Svalbard and UK non-resident trusts continue to offer unique confidentiality advantages.

Key Insights:

• 
  
• 
  
• Svalbard’s Unique Legal Shield
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• Under Article 8 of the 1925 Treaty of Svalbard, no signatory nation may receive tax benefits or preferential treatment related to Svalbard activities.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• This means Svalbard cannot enter into tax treaties without breaching the principle of equal treatment among its 48 signatories — a list that includes Russia, China, and North Korea.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• The result: Svalbard sits outside global tax-sharing agreements, including those underpinning CARF and CRS frameworks.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• The UK’s Non-Resident Trust Advantage
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• The United Kingdom will not abolish its non-resident trust structure, a longstanding tool in international tax and estate planning.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• A non-resident trust is governed by UK law but has trustees based outside the UK.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• This allows for continued privacy and tax efficiency under UK rules — making such trusts valuable for asset protection and wealth transfer planning, even in an era of global transparency.
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

Why It Matters:

While CARF expands global financial reporting, legal structures in Svalbard and the UK illustrate how specific jurisdictions remain beyond its direct reach — offering insights into the future of confidentiality and tax-neutral planning.