DiscoverNeurocritical Care Society PodcastCURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.
CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

Update: 2024-07-03
Share

Description

The purpose of informed consent, as it exists now, is primarily to maintain patient autonomy, but additional benefits include the protection of patients, avoidance of fraud, and promotion of rational decisions, amongst others. It is now considered both an ethical and legal obligation which should, at a minimum, always include: 1) the nature of the procedure, 2) the risks and benefits of the procedure, 3) reasonable alternatives, and 4) risks and benefits of alternatives, with an assessment of comprehension of these elements (1). This week Dr Lauren Koffman is joined by Clotilde Balucani, MD and Julia Durrant, MD two of the authors of the recent Currents article Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

CURRENTS: Consent for Brain Death Determination - the ends justify the means... or it does not.

Neurocritical Care Society