Capital Riots and Parler Vs Amazon Web Services

My thoughts on the disaster of the January 6th and the Parler VS Amazon Web Services lawsuit first round of filings. Links to videos and documents after transcript.

Thomas Talleyrand  0:06  
So to get started just in general, what's going on? Trump has been frozen out of stripe. He's been kicked off his email platform. He has been de banked, threatened with jail threatened with impeachment. This is a very dangerous episode that we're heading into. However, unlike what the left will always tell you, this has never happened before, because they expect everybody to only believe in their life experience. We had this in the 1920s. In the 1800s. We've had multiple elections stolen. This is not the first one where there has been fraud. JFK, LBJ both committed fraud to get elected. It's taught, or at least it was taught in Texas schools. 

Thomas Talleyrand  1:11  
Let's just attack the first things first. The number one claim of the left is that President Trump incited violence. There's no proof that President Trump did any such thing. In fact, if you listen to the Viva Frey and Robert Barnes law podcast that they do on law, excuse me on youtube live every Sunday night, Robert Barnes gives the actual legal definition of inciting violence and you have to intentionally say, go do x, x has to be a violent act. Trump said let's go protest. That's not inciting violence. However, when he said that there was still a 35 minute walk that would have been required to get to the Capitol. In fact, I believe President Trump said the thing that he said about let's go let them hear our voices after the attack it already started. That's something I'm trying to get confirmed. Now the next thing that I want to get into is the queue world q anon world and I guess people will probably blast me. And I won't be able to raise money if I can ever get a payment processor I trust. 

Thomas Talleyrand  2:38  
But I do not understand the whole Q phenomenon. Apparently, the Q people are two different types of people, either one, very religious or two, military and heavily patriotic. They want to be a hero. So they buy into this something secret going on. You can be the hero, you could save the day. We're not that kind of country where violence ever works. No one wants to overthrow the government. We want the government to work as it was designed to work. This is not the first election in which people thought that they got screwed. Starting back in 1824, Andrew Johnson thinks he got shafted. Then he turned around and one and 28. And the election right after Washington's term ended, Adams ended up pronouncing himself president even though he had non conforming electors that were presented to him from Maine, had he done the right thing and rejected those electors. He would not have been president guy. He was the vice president. He did not eject the electors. So he became president. If there's anyone who thinks that Obama or any democrat would not have gone down fighting, just like Trump tried to do, then you're crazy and you're lying. Okay, you're lying to yourself, and you're lying to us. 

Thomas Talleyrand  4:15  
So back to Q and on the Q world in the Q anons are not exactly sure how they all work. But as Robert Barnes and some others have been saying, looks like a classical psyop. Now I am not saying that the federal government has been running some kind of psyop, there's plenty of documentation out there on how to do this kind of thing. in the public sphere. This could be a very sophisticated person, it could be a group of people, it could be a foreign government. It could be some people trying to do what they think is the right thing to help out Trump. I don't exactly see how that type of person comes into play here because what they've done is hurt Trump.

Thomas Talleyrand  5:01  
These people that went into the capital are mostly q anon, or ANTIFA and I don't mean all of them, I mean a few ANTIFA people, there appears to be some people also waving people in.  

Thomas Talleyrand  5:18  
Q anon is a scam. It does not appear to be anything but a project designed to hurt Trump. Let me tell you again, q anon appears to be nothing but a project designed to hurt Trump and discredit his supporters. So now let's get into the capital. Excuse me. Now, let's get into the cracking lawsuits. What a fricking disaster. The Kraken information appears to have come from Q world and some people posting on Q and onboards. Lynn Wood has a history of being absolutely out of control. The lawsuit against him from his partners that reads off some of the crazy wild things Linn Wood has done and said to his partners, and how he has not paid his partners. How he has been out of trust, with his clients money, including apparently, Rittenhouse and some of the Covington kids stuff is really disheartening, and really makes me question his motivations. Now, the guy apparently has some health issues. Hopefully he'll get them taken care of. But what he has done to Sidney Powell, a person that I have a tremendous amount of respect for is absolutely disgusting. 

Thomas Talleyrand  6:56  
Poor Sidney Powell, who is more of an intellectual lawyer than a get down and dirty criminal lawyer and defamation lawyer, or election lawyer has been led astray. It appears some of these so called expert witnesses have backed out on their testimony. There are expert witnesses or affidavits that appear to have been written for the same person but filed under multiple names. So in other words, you had the exact same set of statements in the exact same sentence structure, the exact same copy in the body of the affidavit being the exact same with multiple people submitting it. That could have been a clerical error, but there's too much of that there's the typos. There's the man who said that there was a 350% response in Michigan County, but it was actually it Wisconsin County, or the vice versa. They got their response right back. There's just too much sloppiness. Viva Frei, once again, has some great short ish excerpts on this. I'm going to reach out to Viva and Barnes. Find out if it's okay to share some of their video content or audio content with you on the podcast. But I'm also going to start linking to their stuff on my episode pages to the cracking lawsuits and Sidney Powell. Apparently, this stuff that she repeated, was completely false. And now you have these witnesses that are saying, Oh, no, we didn't write the the proclamations or the affidavits. You (Powell and/or Wood) wrote them and made me sign them even though I didn't want to you roped me into this said we were going to get rich. This kind of thing is apparently something that happens every once in a while with attorneys. You have to be very specific. When you invite somebody or somebody comes to you and offers you information, you have to perform your due diligence. I'm not quite sure why no one from general Flynn or Sydney Powells closs associations,  did not notice that. All of these q anon. crackpot conspiracy theories never came true never came true, not one time. And the thing that really frustrates me about this whole situation with this is that it took away from President Trump's legitimate arguments about the constitutionality of the election. The election was absolutely ripe for challenge. In Texas. We have had an election just recently within the last few years, where there was a similar amount of problems with the signature matches that they ended up throwing out the entire election. They had the same thing with election fraud in North Carolina there the democrats said that there was enough election fraud they felt like to profitably change outcome. But even if there wasn't much election fraud any  is too much election fraud, and throughout the election, given the houseseat to a Democrat. So in a nutshell, in two major events, the questioning or challenging of election results, and the Capitol Hill riots, Q anon played a major role. anyone telling you differently, is gaslighting you or extremely uninformed, this Patriot Act bill, we will get to that in later episodes as we see what comes out of it. But it looks like an extremely large power grab. People are saying the Reichstag fire and other historical situations that the government used to greatly expand its power. And even to usurp power, in the case of the Nazis, where they did not actually have the power aren't too far off, but we'll see where things go. 

Thomas Talleyrand  11:18  
We are not going to speculate. I don't have a bunch of sources that are going to come tell me something. And like I told you in the first podcast, if I have a bunch of sources, I'm not going to tell you stuff and then not tell you what it was. I'm not going to say Well, I've got a source that's told me something. But it's so big, I can't tell you like somebody else that has a very popular podcast that drives me absolutely nuts. 

Thomas Talleyrand  11:44  
Now let's move into using big tech, how anybody would think that it was a good idea to contract with Amazon Web Services on this side of the aisle, or that supports President Trump is beyond me. Looking at the lawsuit filed today by parlor, it's a parent, I know that in Texas, Amazon would be absolutely demolished. If the facts prove out to be on parlar side as they appear to do to be, at least when it comes down to the 30 day notice and right to cure. 30 Day notices and right to cures are almost sacrosanct in law. I've never ever had a lawyer Tell me, hey, yeah, go ahead and violate that part of your contract. If you're going to give somebody a responsibility and a contract, and that contracts over time, and then you don't give them the ability to cure that contract to your satisfaction, then you are not able to terminate the contract. It's just the way it is.