Send us a text

In this conversation, Ralf, Michael and Raphael Koellner discusse the AI Act and its implications for companies in Germany. They highlight the different perspectives on the AI Act, with some seeing it as over-regulation and others seeing it as necessary.
All three also talk about their first experience with AI and shares current use cases, such as cost estimation for insurance companies and contract analysis. They explain the meaning of the AI Act and its four categories of AI systems.
In the ongoing debate they discusse about which authority is responsible for enforcing the AI Act and the need for a clear definition of AI.
They also mentions the forbidden AI systems and the timeline for the implementation of the AI Act. The conversation explores the EU AI Act and its impact on companies, particularly in Germany. It discusses the need for guidelines and regulations to prevent the misuse of AI while still allowing for innovation. The role of an AI officer within companies is highlighted, as well as the importance of defining AI use cases and considering the business case. The conversation also touches on the potential positive impact of the AI Act on small and medium-sized businesses and the emergence of AI in various sectors.

Links
Raphael Köllner | LinkedIn

Keywords

AI Act, Germany, regulation, use cases, forbidden AI, categories, authority, definition, EU AI Act, guidelines, regulations, AI officer, AI use cases, business case, impact, small and medium-sized businesses, sectors

AI, Microsoft Build, OpenAI, language models, AI development tools, hardware advancements, Google Gemini, technology development