Commentary #9: Using Sexism to Promote Animal Rights
Update: 2009-10-21
1
1Description
Dear Colleagues: Would Martin Luther King have had an “I’d Rather Go Naked than Sit in the Back of the Bus” campaign? Of course not. He would have recognized that such a campaign would trivialize the important message of civil rights. Why don’t animal advocates recognize that sexist campaigns similarly trivialize the issue of animal […]
Related posts:
Related posts:
- Commentary #4: Follow-Up to “Pets” Commentary: Non-Vegan Cats
- Commentary #23: Lennox and Moral Reasoning in Animal Rights
- Commentary #6: Aspects of the Vegetarian/Vegan Debate
- Commentary #21: “The Animal Rights Debate,” the Abolitionist Approach Discussion Forum, and a Response to Nicolette Hahn Niman
- Commentary #16: Responding to Questions: Single-Issue Campaigns and MDA Opposition to the Abolitionist Approach
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
In Channel
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
x
I agree that in the sex industry, bodies are commodified. Wouldn't you say that as a professor, your mind is commodified? A professor's clients, for instance students, only look at your performance as a teacher and pay for that. So in a similar way as with prostitutes or strippers the personhood is taken away. With that logic in mind, being a sex worker (by free will that is) is on the same moral ground as performing any other profession. One person has may have great mind and another may have a great body from which they may profit financially. So, for me, following this logic, your comparison doesn't work.