DiscoverSharkCastConsumer Surveys – Separating Pseudo Science from Admissible Evidence
Consumer Surveys – Separating Pseudo Science from Admissible Evidence

Consumer Surveys – Separating Pseudo Science from Admissible Evidence

Update: 2024-02-08
Share

Description

Many complex litigation claims turn on the ultimate question of how a reasonable person perceives an advertisement, marketing message, or business practice. Courts in recent years have been required to decide the admissibility of consumer surveys, separating flawed survey models from those which rise to the level of competent evidence. In this episode, Dorsey Seattle Partner Mike Keyes explains the nuts and bolts of consumer surveys, and how this discipline is often misunderstood with Podcast Host and Dorsey Partner Kent Schmidt.  This episode discusses how Mike’s background as a trademark litigator led him to obtain further training in this science. Listen to learn how litigants can be prepared to either proffer or rebut consumer survey evidence in trial proceedings.

This podcast is not legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship or create any duty of Dorsey & Whitney LLP or those appearing in this podcast to anyone. Although we try to assure that the content of this podcast is accurate, comprehensive, and reflects current legal developments, we do not warrant or guarantee those things. The opinions expressed in this podcast are the opinions of those appearing in the podcast only and not those of Dorsey & Whitney. This podcast is considered attorney advertising under the applicable rules of certain states.

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Consumer Surveys – Separating Pseudo Science from Admissible Evidence

Consumer Surveys – Separating Pseudo Science from Admissible Evidence

Dorsey & Whitney LLP