Dangerous capability tests should be harder

Update: 2024-08-20

Description

We should be spending less time proving today’s AIs are safe and more time figuring out how to tell if tomorrow’s AIs are dangerous: planned-obsolescence.org/dangerous-capability-tests-should-be-harder

Comments

In Channel

OpenAI's CBRN tests seem unclear

2024-11-2113:08

Dangerous capability tests should be harder

2024-08-2008:43

Scale, schlep, and systems

2023-10-1009:24

Language models surprised us

2023-08-2908:36

Could AI accelerate economic growth?

2023-06-0604:59

The costs of caution

2023-05-0104:20

Continuous doesn't mean slow

2023-04-1203:53

AIs accelerating AI research

2023-04-0405:05

Is it time for a pause?

2023-03-3006:36

The ethics of AI red-teaming

2023-03-2702:27

Alignment researchers disagree a lot

2023-03-2703:23

Training AIs to help us align AIs

2023-03-2704:20

Playing the training game

2023-03-2707:53

Situational awareness

2023-03-2707:31

"Aligned" shouldn't be a synonym for "good"

2023-03-2706:14

What we're doing here

2023-03-2704:01

00:00

1.0x

Dangerous capability tests should be harder

#box-pro-ellipsis-176620781316089{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Dangerous capability tests should be harder

Dangerous capability tests should be harder

Ajeya Cotra, Kelsey Piper

Dangerous capability tests should be harder