DiscoverMax Planck LawcastDoing It Right, Doing It Wrong - Experimental Evidence on the Expressive Power of Legal Mechanisms
Doing It Right, Doing It Wrong - Experimental Evidence on the Expressive Power of Legal Mechanisms

Doing It Right, Doing It Wrong - Experimental Evidence on the Expressive Power of Legal Mechanisms

Update: 2024-07-29
Share

Description

Guest: Mahdi Khesali (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods).


Normative ambiguity, which stems from conflicting norms, can lead to inefficiency and self-serving behaviour. In this episode, Mahdi Khesali introduces a study that he and his colleague Yoan Hermstrüwer have conducted. Based on a 'stealing game', Mahdi discusses how voting on a given moral norm affects our moral compass. The findings emphasize the importance of expressive law and how effectively-designed voting mechanisms can communicate normative consensus.


(Audio Production: www.citysoundstudio.de)

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Doing It Right, Doing It Wrong - Experimental Evidence on the Expressive Power of Legal Mechanisms

Doing It Right, Doing It Wrong - Experimental Evidence on the Expressive Power of Legal Mechanisms

Max Planck Law