E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory

Update: 2023-06-12

Description

Christoffer & ezio discuss the tripartite distinction between permissible, impermissible and obligatory and how it might help deal with some cases from Christoffer’s time in the ER

Comments

In Channel

E4M_2.8: last word? assisted suicide and the right to die

2023-11-2736:44

E4M_2.7: should every suicide be prevented?

2023-11-1236:09

E4M_2.6: abortion rights with O Spalletta

2023-11-0740:09

E4M_2.5: reciprocity vs solidarity with O Spalletta

2023-10-2936:29

E4M_2.3: postpartum depression with M Marti-Castaner

2023-10-2328:51

E4M_2.4: the ethics of reproductive technologies with JY Lee

2023-10-1736:14

E4M_2.2: equality vs responsibility?

2023-10-0239:21

E4M_2.1: ezio’s vasectomy

2023-10-0137:13

E4M_1.6: kant v consequentialism

2023-07-1035:41

E4M_1.8: wegovy for all?

2023-07-0338:12

E4M_1.7: ontology vs epistemology

2023-07-0129:39

E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory

2023-06-1228:30

E4M_1.4: explanation vs justification

2023-06-1238:47

E4M_1.3: law vs ethics

2023-06-1231:11

E4M_1.2: evidence vs truth

2023-06-1224:48

E4M_1.1: paternalism vs autonomy

2023-06-1231:51

E4M_3.3: Har vi en fri vilje? Med Peter Qvortrup Geisling

2024-08-1339:51

E4M_3.2: Aktiv dødshjælp med Ebbe Preisler

2024-05-1347:27

E4M_3.1: future doctors, quo vadis?

2024-04-1631:27

00:00

E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory

Ezio Di Nucci, Christoffer Bjerre Haase

#box-pro-ellipsis-175934587971785{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory

E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory

Ezio Di Nucci, Christoffer Bjerre Haase

E4M_1.5: permissible vs obligatory