Discover52 Weeks of CloudELO Ratings Questions
ELO Ratings Questions

ELO Ratings Questions

Update: 2025-09-18
Share

Description

Key Argument

  • Thesis: Using ELO for AI agent evaluation = measuring noise
  • Problem: Wrong evaluators, wrong metrics, wrong assumptions
  • Solution: Quantitative assessment frameworks

The Comparison (00:00-02:00 )

Chess ELO

  • FIDE arbiters: 120hr training
  • Binary outcome: win/loss
  • Test-retest: r=0.95
  • Cohen's κ=0.92

AI Agent ELO

  • Random users: Google engineer? CS student? 10-year-old?
  • Undefined dimensions: accuracy? style? speed?
  • Test-retest: r=0.31 (coin flip)
  • Cohen's κ=0.42

Cognitive Bias Cascade (02:00-03:30 )

  • Anchoring: 34% rating variance in first 3 seconds
  • Confirmation: 78% selective attention to preferred features
  • Dunning-Kruger: d=1.24 effect size
  • Result: Circular preferences (A>B>C>A)

The Quantitative Alternative (03:30-05:00 )

Objective Metrics

  • McCabe complexity ≤20
  • Test coverage ≥80%
  • Big O notation comparison
  • Self-admitted technical debt
  • Reliability: r=0.91 vs r=0.42
  • Effect size: d=2.18

Dream Scenario vs Reality (05:00-06:00 )

Dream

  • World's best engineers
  • Annotated metrics
  • Standardized criteria

Reality

  • Random internet users
  • No expertise verification
  • Subjective preferences

Key Statistics

MetricChessAI Agents
Inter-rater reliabilityκ=0.92κ=0.42
Test-retestr=0.95r=0.31
Temporal drift±10 pts±150 pts
Hurst exponent0.890.31

Takeaways

  1. Stop: Using preference votes as quality metrics
  2. Start: Automated complexity analysis
  3. ROI: 4.7 months to break even

Citations Mentioned

  • Kapoor et al. (2025): "AI agents that matter" - κ=0.42 finding
  • Santos et al. (2022): Technical Debt Grading validation
  • Regan & Haworth (2011): Chess arbiter reliability κ=0.92
  • Chapman & Johnson (2002): 34% anchoring effect

Quotable Moments

"You can't rate chess with basketball fans"

"0.31 reliability? That's a coin flip with extra steps"

"Every preference vote is a data crime"

"The psychometrics are screaming"


Resources

  • Technical Debt Grading (TDG) Framework
  • PMAT (Pragmatic AI Labs MCP Agent Toolkit)
  • McCabe Complexity Calculator
  • Cohen's Kappa Calculator

🔥 Hot Course Offers:

🚀 Level Up Your Career:

Learn end-to-end ML engineering from industry veterans at PAIML.COM

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

ELO Ratings Questions

ELO Ratings Questions

Pragmatic AI Labs