DiscoverBona Fide Needs with Arnold & Porter and the PubKGroupEp. 2.03: The Supreme Court’s Consideration of the FCA Knowledge Standard
Ep. 2.03: The Supreme Court’s Consideration of the FCA Knowledge Standard

Ep. 2.03: The Supreme Court’s Consideration of the FCA Knowledge Standard

Update: 2023-04-25
Share

Description

On April 18, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Schutte v. SuperValu and Proctor v. Safeway, two qui tam cases raising significant questions about the knowledge standard under the False Claims Act. 


Arnold & Porter partners Tirzah Lollar, Craig Margolis, and Christian Sheehan attended the arguments in-person and then provided their real-time insights into the Justices' line of questioning, the parties' responses, and what this may mean for relators and defense counsel. 


In this episode of Bona Fide Needs, we present their discussion, with additional contextual comments by Tirzah Lollar. 


0:30 - Tirzah's introduction


6:00 - Tirzah, Craig, and Christian's webinar discussion


52:30 - Acknowledgements


For our show notes, visit us at the Pub K Group website


 

Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Ep. 2.03: The Supreme Court’s Consideration of the FCA Knowledge Standard

Ep. 2.03: The Supreme Court’s Consideration of the FCA Knowledge Standard

Bill Olver