I recently caught up with Dr Ganesh Rajaram Ahirao who was formerly the Research Director at BERL and Chair of the now disestablished Productivity Commission ,who has been analyzing data from Stats NZ on wealth distribution in our country - and what he has uncovered is truly alarming.

You can find his research on his Substack here:

However I have copied his research post below in case you can’t access it and you want to read his disturbing analysis as he talks to me about what it means.

_______________________________________________________________

In 2024 Aotearoa wealth ranged between

* an average net debt of $298,000 for each of 19,9401 households

* an average net wealth of $9.2 million for each of another 19,940 households.

Alternatively,

* 19,940 households shared total net debt of $5.9 billion

* another 19,940 households shared total net wealth of $183.8 billion.

The picture below illustrates the net wealth per household - across the total spectrum of the wealth distribution - with each vertical bar representing 19,940 households.2

The right-hand end of the spectrum illustrates that, while relatively small in number, the net wealth of the uber-wealthy was visibly well above those only a few bars towards their left. For example, the 19,940 households in the 95th percentile (the 6th bar from the right) each with $4.1 million of net wealth is less than half that of the $9.2 million for each of those households in the 100th percentile.

Adding up the ten bars at the right-hand end of this spectrum, (together representing 199,400 households), results in a combined $1,006.9 billion in net wealth. Each household in this group possesses net wealth of at least $2.5 million, with many having visibly more.

However, wealth at the left-hand end of this spectrum is close to invisible. The widespread prevalence of household’s either in net debt, or possessing relatively negligible levels of net wealth, is saddeningly stark.

The left-hand 50 vertical bars in the picture - together representing the net wealth of 997,000 households (that is, half of all households) - barely register any visible wealth.

The following picture magnifies the previous chart, allowing the left-hand 50 vertical bars to become visible. Note, critically, that the vertical axis depicts a considerably smaller range of wealth (in $thousands and not $millions) than in the previous chart. However, each vertical bar still represents 19,940 households - with the 50 bars together totalling half of all households in Aotearoa in 2024.

The numbers are sobering, if bland

* the half of all households illustrated here together recorded net wealth totalling $138.2 billion

* that means half of all households in Aotearoa possessed 6.7% of the total net wealth of all households

* consequently, the other half of households in Aotearoa possessed 93.3% of the total net wealth of all households.

I urge you to see past the blandness of the numbers and remind yourself that behind each of the 19,940 households represented by each of those vertical bars lie individuals, families, whānau, hapū, and community hopes and aspirations.

The numbers in the latter chart include many people and communities still awaiting - in vain - for the hope and opportunities to be accrued from the much-promised trickle down.

The chasm opens

Those unfortunate to be amongst those households towards the left-hand end of this spectrum have seen their wealth struggle to register any significant improvements over the 9 years to 2024. Worse, many have seen their debts noticeably increase.

What was a divide, has become a chasm.

The combined total debt of the least-wealthy 10% of all households (that is, 199,400 households, being the ten bars at the left-hand end of the spectrum in the pictures above) last year totalled $8.0 billion. In 2015, that debt totalled $1.7 billion.

In contrast, the combined wealth of the most-wealthy 10% (the ten bars at the right-hand end of the first picture) rose from $551.5 billion in 2015 to the aforementioned $1,006.9 billion.

Yes, the nine years to 2024 saw the least-wealthy households in Aotearoa subjected to an ever worsening debt picture - with their total debt rising by $6.3 billion.

That is, an average $31,640 worsening for each household.

Over the same period, the most-wealthy households in Aotearoa enjoyed an increase in their total wealth of $455.3 billion.

That is, an average $2.3 million improvement for each household.

I know it is a cliche to talk about the rich getting richer, while the poor get poorer. But, what I do not know is when (or how) we - as a nation - have seemingly become so immune to this utter failure of our economy and the consequent dereliction of our duty to our people and communities.

Many prognoses, advice, and policies centre on education as the key out of poverty. I share such a view. And, yes, I wholeheartedly encourage further education and training as this data (discussed below) provides evidence of a better wealth outcome for those with further qualifications.

But, as the least-wealthy sought further education over the years to 2024, in a perversity that I can only describe as incredulously cruel, a noticeable component of the loss of wealth of the least-wealthy was a disproportionate increase in student debt.

The hurdles and barriers facing many in navigating across the chasm appear increasingly insurmountable.

The above chart illustrates - through standard headline statistical indicators of inequality - the nature of the gap that has now widened to a stark chasm.

The P90/P10 indicator is defined as the net wealth of the household at the 90th percentile compared to the net wealth of the household at the 10th percentile. The relative closeness (or not) of these two measures reflects the relative equality (or inequality) of the underlying distribution. When stated as a ratio (as depicted), the higher the indicator the higher the relative inequality. And similarly, using the stated respective percentiles, for the P80/P20 and P70/P30 indicators.

The chart shows that, in particular, the P90/P10 indicator has dramatically increased over the 9 year period - from a ratio of 50 to be a ratio of 73 in 2024.

This dramatic shift - accompanied by the relative stability of the other two indicators of inequality - confirm the changes in wealth are relatively concentrated at either ends of the spectrum. In contrast, the ‘middle’ appears to have held relatively stable - likely underpinned largely by the increasing skew towards housing-related wealth.

The throw-away quip could be that this data does not tell us anything we didn’t know already. I would counter that, yes, the data is bland (and blind); but the people and their communities are real, as are their opportunities, aspirations, and hopes.

Whether we knew already is not the issue; it is whether we continue to remain immune to the failure of the economy that we have designed.

A peek under the hood

Houses, financials, non-financials, and student debt

I follow with an outline of some of the detail of the changes in the distribution of wealth. However, to ensure data comparability I am limited to looking at totals and averages for each quintile group; noting each quintile group of households represent a fifth (or 20%) of all the households in Aotearoa (that is, 399,800 households in each quintile in 2024).

The picture below, again, illustrates a comparatively microscopic change for the least-wealthy households (at the left-hand end of the spectrum - labelled Q1). Similarly, the numbers for the second quintile (labelled Q2) are also barely visible.

Closer inspection of the numbers for quintile Q1 reveal

* total net wealth worsened by $2.7 billion over the nine years (or $6,720 per household), comprising

* a $4.8 billion increase in other financial wealth

* a $2.0 billion increase in education debt (student loans)

* a $4.7 billion increase in other non-financial wealth

* a $9.3 billion reduction in net equity in their own houses.

The comparable numbers for quintile Q5 (as visibly illustrated) are

* total net wealth improved by $650.2 billion (or $1.6 million per household) over the nine years, comprising

* a $297.8 billion increase in other financial wealth

* a $0.6 billion increase in education debt (student loans)

* a $119.5 billion increase in other non-financial wealth

* a $233.6 billion increase in net equity in their own houses.

Outside of the total quantum and different direction of the changes over the 9 years recorded by the two quintiles, points to note include

* an improvement in the net equity in own houses for quintile 5 contrasted with the reduction for quintile 1

* undoubtedly related to the reduction in home ownership opportunities, and consequent shift to renting, for households at the left-hand end of the wealth spectrum.

* the improvement in other non-financial</e