Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I

Update: 2020-05-30

Description

1) Raz on Authority; 2) The Argument from Authority; 3) The Practical Difference Thesis

Comments

In Channel

Introduction to the Jurisprudence of Sports

2023-02-1946:17

Meta-interpretation

2020-07-0542:48

Episode 15: Planning Theory of Law II

2020-06-2148:28

Episode 14: Planning Theory of Law I

2020-06-1458:32

Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I

2020-05-3050:59

Episode 12: Law as Integrity

2020-05-2301:03:02

Episode 11: Law’s Empire Strikes Back

2020-05-1654:23

Episode 10: Hart on Law and Morality

2020-05-0953:07

Episode 9: Hart on Interpretation

2020-05-0356:54

Episode 8: The Hart-Dworkin Debate

2020-04-2551:24

Episode 7: Critique of Hart’s Theory

2020-04-1801:14:36

Episode 6: The Rule of Recognition

2020-04-1151:56

Episode 5: Hart’s Critique of Austin II

2020-04-0544:59

Episode 4: Hart’s Critique of Austin I

2020-03-2801:19:46

Episode 3: Chicken or Egg?

2020-03-2142:45

Episode 2: What is law?

2020-03-1633:31

Episode 1: Introduction to Jurisprudence Course

2020-03-1419:38

Tactical Fouling

2023-04-2750:29

What is the Point of Sports?

2023-03-1046:45

00:00

Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I

#box-pro-ellipsis-176048864602143{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I

Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I

Scott Shapiro

Episode 13: Why I am not an Inclusive Legal Positivist, Part I