DiscoverLaw BytesEpisode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Update: 2024-06-03
Share

Description

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.
Comments 
loading
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Michael Geist