DiscoverProof Over PrecedentEpisode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings
Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings

Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings

Update: 2025-11-18
Share

Description

Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources. All we need is an RCT.
Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings

Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings

Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School