DiscoverDouble Loop PodcastEpisode 278 - Aussie Paper on Examiner Disagreements
Episode 278 - Aussie Paper on Examiner Disagreements

Episode 278 - Aussie Paper on Examiner Disagreements

Update: 2025-03-03
Share

Description

In this first recorded episode of 2025, Eric and Glenn start with Eric being pedantic in his “A Truth, A Lie, and a Mandela Effect”. The guys catch up on New Year stuff and then launch into a review of a research paper from New South Wales, Australia, titled “How often do fingerprint examiners disagree in routine casework?” by O’Connor and Chapman (2024) from Forensic Science International. Eric first discusses some of the important differences in casework workflow and conclusions between Aussie examiners and U.S. examiners. Then they discuss the results of the paper and the significance of the findings. At the end, they discuss solutions and ideas for resolving conflict and ultimately find that conflicting results and examiner disagreements are a normal, expected, natural part of the examination process.

Find the paper at:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112139
Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Episode 278 - Aussie Paper on Examiner Disagreements

Episode 278 - Aussie Paper on Examiner Disagreements

Glenn Langenburg and Eric Ray