DiscoverNo CompromisesFinding a code-review style that fits your brain
Finding a code-review style that fits your brain

Finding a code-review style that fits your brain

Update: 2025-07-19
Share

Description

Joel and Aaron compare two very different ways to tackle pull-requests—reviewing them commit-by-commit or scanning the whole thing at once. They dig into when each approach shines, how “atomic” commits can help (or hurt) reviewers, and why understanding how your teammate’s brain works is a super-power. Along the way they share practical tips for leaving yourself notes, spotting hidden changes, and keeping large refactors under control.

  • (00:00 ) - The “gift” of a pull request and the pain of huge PRs

  • (02:30 ) - Joel’s commit-by-commit strategy and where it helps

  • (04:50 ) - Aaron’s Tetris-style holistic review (and leaving self-notes)

  • (07:45 ) - When atomic commits backfire and trust becomes a factor

  • (08:45 ) - Silly bit


Sign up for the newsletter
Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Finding a code-review style that fits your brain

Finding a code-review style that fits your brain

Joel Clermont and Aaron Saray