<picture style="max-width: 100%; height: auto">
<source
type="image/webp"
srcset="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c2400x1350-w2400-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-2400x1350.jpg.webp 2400w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1200x675.jpg.webp 1200w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c800x450-w800-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-800x450.jpg.webp 800w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c600x338-w600-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-600x338.jpg.webp 600w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c331x186-w331-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-331x186.jpg.webp 331w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1200x675.jpg.webp 1200w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1920x1080-w1920-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1920x1080.jpg.webp 1920w"
sizes="(min-width: 753px) 70vw, (min-width: 1190px) 768px, 100vw"
>
<source
type="image/jpeg"
srcset="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c2400x1350-w2400-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-2400x1350.jpg 2400w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1200x675.jpg 1200w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c800x450-w800-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-800x450.jpg 800w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c600x338-w600-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-600x338.jpg 600w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c331x186-w331-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-331x186.jpg 331w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1200x675-w1200-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1200x675.jpg 1200w,https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/c1920x1080-w1920-q60/uploads/2024/05/Dershowitz_vs_Greenwald_3840x2160-v5-1920x1080.jpg 1920w"
sizes="(min-width: 753px) 70vw, (min-width: 1190px) 768px, 100vw"
>

</picture>

Professor and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz and Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Glenn Greenwald debate the resolution, "The U.S. should strike Iran's nuclear facilities."

Taking the affirmative is Dershowitz, an American lawyer and law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law. From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993. He is the author of several books about politics and the law, including The Case for Israel and The Case for Peace. His two most recent works are The Case Against Impeaching Trump, and Guilt by Accusation: The Challenge of Proving Innocence in the Age of #MeToo. In January 2020, he joined President Donald Trump's legal team as Trump was being tried on impeachment charges in the Senate. He is a strong supporter of Israel but self-identifies as both "pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli."

Taking the negative is Greenwald, a constitutional lawyer, investigative journalist, and best-selling author. Acclaimed as one of the 25 most influential political commentators by The Atlantic, one of America's top 10 opinion writers by Newsweek, and one of the Top 100 Global Thinkers for 2013 by Foreign Policy, Greenwald has won the highest awards in journalism, including the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for the revelations surrounding the National Security Agency and Edward Snowden.

This debate was moderated by Soho Forum Director Gene Epstein.

Timestamps:
00:00:00 Introduction
00:02:06 Dershowitz's Opening Statement
00:19:43 Greenwald's Opening Statement
00:37:48 Dershowitz's Rebuttal
00:45:27 Greenwald's Rebuttal
00:53:56 Q&A
01:35:08 Dershowitz's Summation
01:40:22 Greenwald's Summation

Abbreviated Transcript:

Moderator: Now that we've got everyone voting, we can call our debaters to the stage. The United States should strike Iran's nuclear facilities speaking for the affirmative Alan Dershowitz. Alan, please come to the stage. Speaking for the negative, Glenn Greenwald. Glenn, please come to the stage.

All right guys, as you know, the timekeeper is in front. We'll be flashing five minute, two minute, and one-minute and 30 seconds cards. Professor Dershowitz prefers to use the 85-year-old prerogative and do it from his chair. Alan, you have 17 and a half minutes to make your case. Please take it away, Alan.

Alan Dershowitz: Thank you so much. What a wonderful event. At a time when, as the moderator said, there are too few debates, too many bumper stickers, too many people cheering for one side or the other, having a great debate about a really difficult subject is so important. Parts of me wishes this was not a debate, wishes it was a discussion because there are arguments on both sides of this. Very, very compelling arguments on both sides of this. It's a very, very difficult question anytime a decision is made to take preventive military action that involves cataclysmic consequences and considerations.

I want to go over why I think the argument here favors taking such preventive military action, though I understand the consequences. We know, we know the risks of taking preventive military action when it shouldn't have been taken. We can call those false positives. You can call them by whatever word you want to call them, but we know that that happened in Iraq when we went in thinking or believing or proclaiming or claiming that there were nuclear facilities only to find out that there wasn't with very tragic events for so many people, civilians and military.

A lot has been written about false positives. A lot has been written about false decisions, poor decisions, to take military intervention in a preventive way, but not enough has been written about or considered about the risks of not taking preventive action when preventive action is necessary and would save lives and would do a great deal of good in the world. History provides lots of examples of failures to act when action might have prevented catastrophic harms. And I'm going to argue that this is one such situation. Perhaps the most telling example of the failure to act was the failure of Great Britain and France to enforce the Versailles Treaty by taking preventive military action to stop the military buildup of Germany following the first World War. A military attack on Germany in 1935 or '36 when its war machine was still weak, might have prevented the second World War with its tens of millions of deaths.

Joseph Goebbels, who was the obviously propaganda minister of the Nazi regime, wrote about this in his diaries. I hope you'll pay very close attention to this one paragraph because it's so critical. Here's what he said: "In 1933, a French premier ought to have said, and if I had been the French premier, I would've said," this is Goebbels talking. "The new Reich Chancellor is the man who wrote Mein Kampf, which says this and that. The man cannot be tolerated in our vicinity. Either he disappears or we march. But they didn't do it. They let us slip through the risky zone and we were able to sail around the dangerous reefs. And when we were done and well armed better than they." He then says they started the war. Of course, Germany started the war, but the point is still the same.

The rest we know is tragic history. Germany built up its armed forces without countermeasures by its intended enemies and conquered most of Western Europe, killing tens of millions of people. Most of these deaths could almost certainly have bee