HEADLINES
Pause holds as Israel withdraws to lines
Hamas mobilizes 7000 security forces in Gaza
Identifying 28 hostages' bodies underway

The time is now 2:01 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.

Two o’clock in the afternoon, and this is the hour’s update on the developing situation in Israel, Gaza, and the broader Middle East. A US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas announced in Sharm el-Sheikh remains the central thread, with both sides reporting adherence to the lines laid out in the Trump peace plan’s first phase. American officials, including the White House envoy Steve Witkoff and CENTCOM commander Admiral Brad Cooper, have publicly reaffirmed that Israeli forces in Gaza have withdrawn to the agreed positions, signaling a pause that many hope can hold as the terms of the ceasefire are tested in the days ahead. The framing from Washington has emphasized the goal of stabilizing a volatile situation through peace through strength, a principle proponents say aligns with Israel’s security needs and its insistence on guarding against renewed threats on multiple fronts.

In Gaza, Israeli forces began a partial withdrawal in alignment with the first phase of the ceasefire framework, as part of an orderly transition toward the location-based lines agreed in Sharm el-Sheikh. Preparations are underway to receive the 48 hostages still held by Hamas, with authorities signaling a meticulous, careful approach to any further movement or handover. Israel’s security establishment has underscored that the disengagement is designed to reduce civilian hardship while maintaining the capability to respond decisively if Hamas violates the terms of the arrangement. The operational mood in Jerusalem remains resolute: security authorities say the threat landscape outside Gaza’s immediate border remains complex, and any gains must be safeguarded against a range of hostile actions.

Across Gaza, Hamas has moved to reassert control over areas recently vacated by the Israeli Defense Forces. Reports, including BBC sourcing cited by Israel Hayom, indicate that roughly 7,000 members of Hamas’s internal security forces have been mobilized, with five new governors appointed to oversee different districts. The move is described as an effort to reestablish administrative and security control, including deployments by former armed wing commanders and militants who have influenced the strip’s power balance for years. The recruitment push reportedly reached members by phone and text messages, rallying them to report within 24 hours. Local observers warn that the redeployment could heighten internal friction and potentially spark clashes as factions jockey for influence in a post-withdrawal environment. A veteran Palestinian security officer and other local voices described a Gaza in flux, concerned about a slide into renewed intra-Palestinian violence even as Hamas seeks to project authority.

Within Israel’s broader narrative, the American effort remains a defining backdrop. Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and adviser, has publicly shared reflections on the past ten months, emphasizing partnership with Israeli leaders and the shared sense of responsibility for regional stability. In remarks delivered to audiences in the space known as the “Hostages’ Square,” Kushner and Witkoff have framed the moment as the convergence of determination and courage that can yield a durable path to peace. The exchanges have underscored a view that the path forward requires steadfast leadership from Israel and persistent, principled diplomacy from American partners, with a message of gratitude extended to regional allies who supported the effort. The tone has been celebratory of a difficult breakthrough, tempered by the recognition that the road ahead will demand continued restraint, coordination, and vigilance from all sides.

From the security front in Israel, forensic and investigative teams are preparing for one of the more challenging tasks: identifying the bodies of 28 Israeli hostages being returned from Hamas captivity. Teams are assembling a database and mobilizing experts to carry out what authorities describe as a painstaking and essential process, aimed at ensuring families know the fates of their loved ones and that the record of the crisis is accurately documented for history and accountability. The identification operation is viewed as a sensitive, meticulously coordinated step within a broader humanitarian and security framework tied to the ceasefire and hostage negotiations.

Beyond the immediate theater of conflict, developments in the region and beyond continue to shape the political and security calculus. A BBC-based report on Hamas’s mobilization in Gaza drew attention to the organization’s effort to reassert control, with new governors appointed to oversee districts and new security deployments observed by observers. The broader regional environment remains charged with a mix of security concerns, diplomatic maneuvers, and the ongoing reporting of arms movements and strategic alignments that could influence future rounds of pressure, negotiation, and potential escalation.

Internationally, a day marked by a spectrum of security concerns drew attention to the fragility of peace efforts and the diverse responses from public audiences. In Oslo, hundreds gathered for a pro-Palestinian demonstration during a World Cup qualifier between Israel and Norway, briefly unfurling a large Palestinian flag and banners calling for the protection of children. The scene illustrated the global resonance of the conflict and the way popular sentiment can ripple into sports, diplomacy, and public discourse. Meanwhile, in Paris, reports of a threatening letter received by workers at Notre-Dame Cathedral surfaced, prompting a security response and a reminder of the persistent threat environment that underpins public life across the Atlantic world.

In another regional thread, observers noted conversations around Iran’s influence and its proxies as part of the broader security equation. Reports and commentary referenced by outlets in the region suggest that US and allied actions—such as efforts to constrain Iranian maritime activity and to monitor arms movements—continue to shape the calculus of Iran’s partners and adversaries. At the same time, discussions around arms deals and regional alignments contribute to a sense of strategic volatility that could affect the ceasefire’s durability and the feasibility of a sustained political settlement. In parallel, speculation about export controls and potential military movements linked to Iran and its network underscores the risk that external shocks could complicate the region’s fragile pause.

On the ground in Gaza’s Beit Lahia and the Sabra neighborhood, reports indicate security chaos as competing factions clash and the aftershocks of the ceasefire reverberate through daily life. The tension underscores how quickly the ceasefire’s calm can be punctured if groups test the limits of the new order or if external actors misread signals about who holds authority on the ground. The human dimension remains acute: families displaced or separated by the fighting, civilians navigating aftermaths, and a population braced for a long, uncertain pause that will be judged by whether trust can be rebuilt across the lines of conflict.

Closer to home, Israel’s domestic and regional security posture remains anchored in the combination of deterrence and diplomacy. American leadership touted as essential to the ceasefire’s framework—along with the collaboration seen in Washington, Jerusalem, and allied capitals—continues to project an image of American commitment to Israel’s security interests as part of a broader strategy for Middle East stability. At the same time, regional partners, including those who have voiced support for Israel’s right to defend itself, are weighing how best to sustain momentum on peace efforts without allowing violence to reassert itself.

As events unfold, the ceasefire’s durability will be measured by the ability of all parties to maintain restraint, enforce the provisions of the agreement, and demonstrate tangible steps toward mediation, humanitarian relief, and political process. For Israel, the emphasis remains on security—on safeguarding its citizens, ensuring the integrity of its borders, and preventing attacks from any quarter. For its American partners, the aim is to balance a robust security posture with a clear pathway toward peace through strength, consistent with the approach articulated by President Trump and his administration during this period of regional volatility.

For audiences seeking a broader lens, the day’s stories remind us that the region’s stability is inextricably linked to how well leaders manage the balance between force and diplomacy, how regional actors respect red lines, and how the international community supports a sustainable peace that addresses legitimate security concerns while preserving human dignity. The path ahead will require disciplined reporting, careful diplomacy, and a steady commitment to the truth, even as the headlines continue to evolve.

That is the latest from the field and from the capitals that frame this crisis. The news continues to develop, and we will bring you further updates as soon as they are confirmed. This is the hour, and this is the moment—one that many hope marks a turning point toward peace through strength, with the responsibility shared by Israel, its allies, and the broader international community. And that, in the words of many who have watched this drama unfold, is the way it is.

Thank you for tuning in to this Israel Today: Ongoing War Report update.
I'm Noa Levi. Stay safe and informed.
Keep in