HEADLINES
Gaza ceasefire fragile as Hamas violations mount
Canada and Germany back Ukraine Gaza aid
Disarm Hamas to unlock Gaza reconstruction

The time is now 2:01 AM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.

This hour’s update on events shaping the Middle East and the broader regional security picture begins with the enduring questions surrounding the Gaza pause and Israel’s security requirements. In a public discussion led by prominent historians and journalists, the city and symbol of Jerusalem is analyzed as a focal point where past and present narratives converge, framing how international audiences understand the region’s turbulence and resilience.

On the Gaza ceasefire, multiple violations attributed to Hamas continue to raise questions about the durability of any pause. Hamas officials have signaled that hostages remain a central element of leverage, while the group also underscored that Israeli actions during the pause constitute breaches of the agreement. Israeli military officials have described ongoing operations as aimed at preventing attacks and degrading Hamas’s military capabilities, including tunnels and weapons stockpiles. The exchange underscores a broader dispute over how a ceasefire can be sustained while the parties contend with competing security and political objectives.

Turning to diplomacy, Canada and Germany publicly discussed the war in Ukraine and the situation in Gaza on the sidelines of the G20, reaffirming support for Ukraine and stressing that any agreement must directly involve Kyiv, protect its fundamental interests, and include concrete security assurances. The leaders also emphasized the importance of enabling large-scale humanitarian aid into Gaza and outlined a framework for cooperation in critical minerals, clean energy, artificial intelligence, aerospace, and defense. These conversations reflect how major powers are coordinating on security guarantees and humanitarian access in a conflict that persists across a broad international landscape.

In Washington’s orbit, Israel’s assessment of the pause in Gaza emphasizes the danger of arms rearmament during periods of relative calm. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has noted that without an external force to disarm Hamas, Israel may assume responsibility for demilitarizing the Gaza Strip, a stance echoed in discussions with US officials. US officials have indicated a shared interest in the potential for disarmament as a condition for any rehabilitation or reconstruction program, underscoring that rehabilitation proceeds would be tied to verifiable steps toward demilitarization. The evolving dynamic places emphasis on how security guarantees and disarmament measures would be verified on the ground before any reconstruction can proceed.

On the ground in Gaza, humanitarian and security concerns continue to intersect. Reports circulated by Hamas’s media office claim sizable civilian casualties and injuries resulting from Israeli strikes, while Israeli sources maintain that casualties primarily involve militants and limited civilian harm where collateral damage occurred in the course of targeting armed groups. Independent verification remains challenging in the fog of ongoing fighting, but the numbers cited by different sides highlight the fragile nature of any ceasefire and the difficulty of reconciling warnings of civilian harm with stated counterterrorism objectives.

Within Israel and its political landscape, domestic currents continue to shape security policy. The Likud party is preparing for internal conventions—an unusually early organizational event for a party that anchors the government—set against the backdrop of a year that is expected to be pivotal for national elections. The process is expected to intensify debates over party leadership responsibilities and policy direction at a time when security and diplomacy are at the forefront of public concern.

In regional commentary, editorial voices contend that Israel should consider opening channels with neighboring states such as Lebanon and Syria as a means to counter Hezbollah and reduce regional tensions. The argument reflects a broader assessment that new interlocutors could influence strategic calculations and potentially alter the security calculus surrounding Israel’s northern front. At the same time, broader regional dynamics continue to complicate the path to any durable peace arrangement, with external powers weighing roles in Gaza, reconstruction, and security guarantees.

Beyond the immediate conflict, observers note that international announcements and public diplomacy efforts signal a continued search for stability. A recent report on the Dubai Airshow highlighted ongoing questions about defense collaboration and regional defense procurement, underscoring the interplay between technological development, strategic alliances, and security postures that feed into the broader regional balance.

In related developments, regional and international discussions continue to grapple with the possibility of an international stabilizing force for Gaza. While this concept has gained traction in certain policy circles, several countries have signaled reluctance to deploy troops directly into Gaza, leaving Israel convinced that unilateral measures or arrangements with capable external actors may be necessary to achieve disarmament and demilitarization, at least in the near term. In parallel, statecraft surrounding Gaza’s rehabilitation remains tied to progress on disarmament, with officials indicating that reconstruction would be contingent on verifiable steps to reduce Hamas’s military capacity.

Finally, the evolving narrative includes scrutiny of how foreign policy choices influence domestic Jewish and Israeli perspectives abroad. Commentary and reporting explore how perceptions of US policy, regional diplomacy, and the balance of humanitarian considerations with security imperatives shape international opinion and policy decisions.

This hour’s briefing preserves the balance of perspectives and emphasizes the underlying significance: security concerns, humanitarian access, and the prospect of a durable settlement remain interdependent. As events continue to unfold, the central question remains whether a credible path to demilitarization and reconstruction can be realized in a manner that satisfies security needs, respects humanitarian considerations, and gains the support of key international partners.

Thank you for tuning in to this Israel Today: Ongoing War Report update.
I'm Noa Levi. Stay safe and informed.
Keep in mind that this AI-generated report may contain occasional inaccuracies, so consult multiple sources for a comprehensive view. Find the code and more details in the podcast description.

SOURCES
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-874535
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-874835
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109343
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109342
https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-police-used-untrue-claims-about-israeli-fans-to-justify-soccer-game-ban-report/
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109332
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109330
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hkk0dqlbze
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109329
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/11/canada-pm-and-german-chancellor-merz-discuss-ukraine-gaza-g20-sidelines
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109328
https://t.me/abualiexpress/109327
https://www.jpost.com/environment-and-climate-change/article-874828
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/11/analysis-tejas-crash-dampens-export-hopes-indian-fighter-jet
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-874811
https://t.me/newssil/180989
https://t.me/newssil/180988
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-874654
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-874795
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-874796
https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/11/23/gaza-international-force-azerbaijan-withdraws-hamas-demilitariz