DiscoverMedicine via myPodJack Heart Conversations From The Porch: Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?
Jack Heart Conversations From The Porch: Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?

Jack Heart Conversations From The Porch: Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?

Update: 2024-12-24
Share

Description

Phil’s show notes

* Scientific data and conclusions are influenced by the observer, regardless of the devices used for measurement – Double slit

* The 5 w’s of me

* Who – the conscious observer

* What – a consciousness that is being

* Where – in quantum soup

* When – in the moment

* Why – for sensory experience, growth

* Conscious observation is influenced by experience, sensory limitations, ad propaganda.

* A theoretical philosophical hypothesis is never truly proven – only agreed upon at the time by multiple observers.

* All of the above is based upon the BELIEF of the observer; belief in the data, belief in the measurements, the philosophic underpinning of the observer’s society. – all influencing the outcomes.

* The conclusion of a hypothesis is not a law nor a fact but an opinion of the observer. The conclusion is based on analysis of the observed and recorded data at the time experiment was conducted and by the comparative and contrasting data available.

* There is no time like the present – where are the bones, why so much mud, archaeological finds out of place etc.

* Double Slit

* Video Game Analogy

* Manipulation of the game or the effect of conscious observation upon that being observed

* Validation from science 1994

* Maintaining the matrix scientific discoveries in genomic structures

* Epigenetics and communication between genetic code snippets across species – Biophoton emission is the spontaneous emission of ultraweak light emanating from all living systems, including man.

* How belief in the unseen and immeasurable create solid matter

* How the matrix is held together for observation

* Manipulation of belief to change the interpretation of the observation

Many are the readers and listeners of Jack’s work who already have a belief in the simulated reality in which we are experiencing. Today we discuss how the scientific method is applied to this and some findings.

The background of this concept in the modern era (the last couple of generations) has to do with quantum physics theories and the mathematical computations borne out by experimentation electronically and mechanically using recent technology. Of these recent findings one stood out to me. And it isn’t from the world of physics but that of medicine. Look up biophotons and microDNA role in epigenetics.

I’ll start with this one thing, everyone has the ability to research the double slit experiment. This is where a photon is either a particle or a wave depending on whether it is being observed by a “human being’s consciousness”. I put it in this way for a particular reason. The reason being that we don’t know if the photon interacts with dogs, cats or AI in the same way. So, depending on the focus of the participating viewer the state of the photon changes from wave (not seen potential energy) to a particle (seen radiated energy). For the remainder of this article, I will use the word see to mean consciousness receiving input. Whether that input be from the 5 classical senses or measured but ignored by conscious translation.

Moving on, there has been the question in the quantum world about the existence of reality if it is not being observed. Lets dig in to this a little. When I am focused on my keyboard and my attempt to communicate thoughts does the road that goes by exist, or is it only there when I am putting my focus upon it? I know it is on a map, I travel it often, but when my consciousness is not experiencing or thinking about it is it part of my reality? And if I say yes, it exists outside of me always, is that reality or a belief in something unseen until I see it again?

Belief is a huge factor in maintaining the conscious connection to reality. I define belief loosely as the solidity or stability of something not seen to endure until seen. Often, in the case of an individual’s belief in Gods ie: Yahweh, Jesus, Mohammed, or a pantheon the “God” is never seen in a true photonic particle physical form. So belief comes down to inculcating in the external unseen teaching/propaganda input and using that input to create an imaginary world. That propaganda input is used by other consciousnesses to gain some form of manipulation over your view of the reality of the matrix. Does that unseen imaginary world become your reality?

Consider again the double slit experiment. If you put your focus upon the photon it becomes physically measurable. So if your belief in something you consciously view which is not measurable in reality but nonetheless exists in consciousness, either originally imagined by you or something you were given to believe in, and you wish to create that which is not already in your (measurable) reality can that thing you wish to create become a part of your reality? An inventor does this every day, think of something which is not in the world, see it from all sides in their mind’s eye, then make become measurable through his physical efforts. How does this relate to the Quantum matrix simulation?

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/genetic-dark-matter-and-return-goddess

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7795982_An_Introduction_to_Human_Biophoton_Emission

A scientist discovered how to manipulate reality. 12 hours later, he vanished...

https://www.physics-astronomy.com/4-cases-when-things-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/ – spooky actions at a distance.

My Big TOE – My Big Theory of Everything

Excerpt: Chaioth ha-Qadosh – Tookie Memorial Post, Sīrius Calling II By Jack Heart & Orage – The Human: Jack Heart, Orage and Friends

Thomas Hobbes, a scion of the British Empire and the father of Transhumanism, even penned its bible taking his cues from the Zohar and naming it what he thought the most evil title he could give it; Leviathan. In this maleficent monument to tautological dialectics; Hobbs, using rationalism which was the science of his day, makes the case that man is no more than a biological machine, an epicurean thing, which is merely a product of its own environment and the property of the state.

Depravedly insane as Hobbes was he was not stupid. He knew just what he was doing; the title is a dead giveaway. He had hated the clergy since he was a boy and they forced his father out of London leaving his aristocratic family without a patriarch. He had intended to write the bible for atheism right from the start. He would have been exposed to what was in the Zohar through the teachings of John Dee and Sir Edward Kelley which had infected the fledgling empires aristocracy in the sixteenth century.

Leviathan although begun earlier was completed in the middle of the seventeenth by the chronically ailing Hobbes. He would live another thirty years till the ripe old age of ninety-one and seems to have been in the habit of using health issues to stay out of the wars he was always around.

The academic sycophants of Hobbes would define his book as the foundation of “Materialism,” philosophy’s flavor of the day since the “Enlightenment…” Transhumanism is the logical conclusion of Materialism just like death is the logical conclusion to a malignant tumor.

Hobbes, academia become death, was initially ineffectually challenged by Anglican Bishop John Bramhall who did what he could against Hobbes and his supporting chorus of academic chimpanzees. It would be a half century before this Typhoid Mary of Transhumanism was effectively challenged by an Irish aristocrat and Christian shaman who understood the importance of vigorous good health in formulating ones perception of the world. George Berkeley, the Bishop of Cloyne in Ireland, ironically or maybe not, is the man to which the University of California, Berkeley is named after.

To keep fit enough to intellectually smack down the apostles of Materialism, as he was seemingly born to do, Berkeley drank what he called tar water or “distilled acid of tar (turpentine)” by the gallons.

In America’s back woods, where they handle venomous snakes as part of the Christian religion, they still use it as a cure for snake bite. Berkeley “learned about this cure from the American Narragansett Indians. You mixed tar with water then after a few days, you skim off the clear liquid and drink several cups per day.” (64)

Berkeley hailed tar water as a panacea for virtually all that ails a human being:“A cure for foulness of blood, ulceration of bowels, lungs, consumptive coughs, pleurisy peripheumony, erysipelas, asthma, indigestion, cachectic and hysteric cases [insanity], gravel, dropsy, and all inflammations.” (65)

Arthur Schopenhauer his intellectual heir who came a century later called Berkeley the father of Idealism but by the dawning of the twenty-first century it would turn out he was even more than that, far more. If ever there was a Prophet who could transcend time it was George

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Jack Heart Conversations From The Porch: Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?

Jack Heart Conversations From The Porch: Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?