DiscoverOpen to DebateMOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?
MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

Update: 2024-05-101
Share

Description

The Supreme Court will soon decide on a case surrounding a medication used for abortion, mifepristone, and whether the drug should continue to be available based on claims of safety and ethical considerations. Those in favor of restrictions argue that the FDA fast-tracked its approval without considering health impacts. Those against restriction argue the FDA made its decisions based on safety and efficiency, and it’s being targeted to further infringe on women’s rights. Now we debate: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?  


Petitioner: Julia Kaye, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project  

Respondent: Catherine Glenn Foster, Senior Fellow in Legal Policy at the Charlotte Lozier Institute  

Judge's Chair: John Donvan, Moderator-in-Chief and Emmy award-winning journalist 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Comments 
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

Open to Debate