Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, part 1: Post-nut clarity and forbidden knowledge
Description
Discussing chapters 1-10 of Mary Shelley's 1818 genre mash-up Frankenstein.
On Mary Shelley's stacked genetics, the 'scenius' with Lord Byron and Percy Shelley, questions over authorship including a suspiciously accurate depiction of post-nut clarity.
Forbidden knowledge: are infohazards real, taking accountability for new technology, guilt and the disgust instinct, strong parallels with AGI, arguments for and against creating new species. Can we defend a parochial concern for our own family/friends/species?
Is the monster innately evil? Or a product of his environment?
We love this book. hyped to hear the monster's side of the story in part 2.
CHAPTERS
- (00:00:00 ) pop culture Frankenstein and namespace collision
- (00:04:55 ) synopsis
- (00:07:56 ) Initial reactions
- 00:11:20 ) Suspiciously accurate depiction of post-nut clarity
- (00:13:38 ) Mary Shelley’s elite genetics
- (00:16:54 ) Forbidden knowledge and infohazards
- (00:26:08 ) Victor as deadbeat dad
- (00:31:15 ) AGI comparison: how do we feel about creating a new species?
- (00:38:00 ) The burden of guilt (the bumblebee incident)
- (00:41:27 ) Nature vs nurture and rebelling against god
- (00:45:08 ) Back to the question of AGI and creating new species
- (00:55:35 ) Parochialism and expanding moral circles
- (01:03:45 ) Cultural legacy of this book
- (01:08:43 ) should Zuckerberg and friends try to model consequences of AI?
Send us mail: doyouevenlitbro@gmail.com
COMING UP
The Metamorphosis - Franz Kafka
Ubik - Philip K Dick
The Fall - Camus